User talk:Servicepk

May 2025

Hello! I'm Denisarona. I just wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the page League of Nations have been reverted because they appear to have added incorrect information. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source, discuss it on the article's talk page, or leave me a message on my talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 15:28, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to United Nations. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Remsense ‥ 论 12:29, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Motion Picture Editors Guild. Remsense ‥ 论 12:30, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay Sir....I am new and try to learn and contribute....I will careful next time ...Thank you for guidance. Servicepk (talk) 12:33, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. Please don't add links that already appear in the article to the "See also" section, please see MOS:NOTSEEAGAIN. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 16:05, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Islamabad, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
You have previously been asked to STOP adding "See also" links to pages that are already linked in the article, but are continuing to do so. Please STOP before you are blocked - Arjayay (talk) 13:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:33, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Muhammad Omer Chaudhry

added a link pointing to Controller

University of Narowal

added a link pointing to Punjab Assembly

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]