User talk:SleepDeprivedGinger

Welcome!

Hello SuperWikiBrother! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 12:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

December 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Angry Birds has been reverted.
Your edit here to Angry Birds was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline (see also this list of frequently-discussed sources). The reference(s) you added or changed (https://angrybirds.fandom.com/wiki/Angry_Birds_Racing) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for letting me know! SuperWikiBrother (talk) 13:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MarioCircuit-MarioKart8.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MarioCircuit-MarioKart8.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SNESMarioCircuit1.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SNESMarioCircuit1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angry Birds Journey (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG with a lack of secondary sources. See also WP:USERG for why player reviews cannot be used as proof of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angry Birds Journey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:43, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas & Friends: Hero of the Rails (video game) (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article is almost completely unsourced. No original research is permitted on Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas & Friends: Hero of the Rails (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas & Friends: The Movie (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more external news sources showing that principal photography has commenced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thomas & Friends: The Movie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SuperWikiBrother! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

edit at Draft: List of creatures in Minecraft

I have undone part of your edit to Draft:List of creatures in Minecraft, where you added "and mobs" to the introduction of the article. The article includes a list of creatures as per the title, not a list of creatures and mobs. The reason why it says mob in some of the sections, is because that was what the article originally was and I haven't changed it yet. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 18:51, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's fair enough. I guess it didn't make sense anyway since that would refer to them twice. SuperWikiBrother (talk) 13:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 21:22, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please stop italicizing game titles within italicized header text. Because the text itself is italic, to emphasis the game title it should be "de-italicized" in this case. You are editing (and edit warring against multiple editors) against our MOS guidelines. -- ferret (talk) 16:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But that’s what I was doing? Italicising the text? I put "text is already in italic" as the summary for all of those edits, because I was making sure the titles appeared as italic. Using italic marks for templates that already are italicised "de-italicises" the title, so I thought I was fixing the problem. Or maybe it just appears for me, since I use the Legacy appearance on desktop. I apologise for any inconvenience. SuperWikiBrother (talk) 16:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When the sentence is already italicized, such as hatnotes, the title of the game should be UN-italicized. This is accomplished with the same syntax as italics. You were removing the formatting that did this, causing the game title to be italicized inside the hatnote. Worse, you were reverted like 10 times for it and kept repeating it. -- ferret (talk) 17:23, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. I was completely unaware of these rules since all I was aware of was that all titles must be italicised (maybe because I started with the Super Mario Wiki before joining Wikipedia). I will take this into account in the future and I once again apologise. SuperWikiBrother (talk) 17:27, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thomas & Friends: Hero of the Rails (video game)

Hello, SuperWikiBrother. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas & Friends: Hero of the Rails (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bad Piggies 2 (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately it's most likely in the territory of still best addressed under the Angry Birds franchise or Rovio article at the moment. Upcoming games are generally in the territory of WP:TOOSOON unless there's significant coverage about something WP:EXCEPTIONAL on the game - in this case a lot of the sourcing is not strong, mostly WP:PRIMARY or WP:USERG. I think the threshold here is whether reviews from reliable sources (like those in WP:VG/S) can be found or are published, as there's just no reliable source that is appraising the game. Happy to chat if you need any help.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bad Piggies 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mario Day (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While somewhat borderline, it still does not appear to be standalone notable from the Mario series in my view. The vast majority of Mario Day mentions are ads and Nintendo updates. A Cultural impact of the Mario franchise article may work better discussing this subject as part of it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mario Day and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm FlightTime. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mr. Men, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Plus "TBA" never go in a section header. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Angry Birds Journey

Hello, SuperWikiBrother. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Angry Birds Journey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

S.M.L. v. Nintendo moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to S.M.L. v. Nintendo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jonathan Deamer (talk) 19:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angry Birds Journey (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Sharpest Lives was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The previous comment by Zxcvbnm has not been addressed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angry Birds Journey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Sharpest Lives (contribs) 13:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Percy the Small Engine

Hello, SuperWikiBrother. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Percy the Small Engine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mario vs. Donkey Kong (video game)

Hello, SuperWikiBrother,

Please do not ever move, redirect or merge an article that is being discussed in an AFD discussion. It is very disruptive. Wait until the AFD is closed before taking any drastic action on an article being considered for deletion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Super Mario Bros. Z (June 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Mario Bros. Z (2nd nomination).

This title has been redirected to List of unofficial Mario media, and should remain redirected, as per the AFD.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Mario Circuit" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mario Circuit has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 12 § Mario Circuit until a consensus is reached. Mia Mahey (talk) 21:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas & Friends: Hero of the Rails (video game)

Hello, SleepDeprivedGinger. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Thomas & Friends: Hero of the Rails".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mario Day

Hello, SleepDeprivedGinger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mario Day, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mario Day

Hello, SleepDeprivedGinger. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mario Day".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:47, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page history of Magic in the Water

The page history shows both of us reverting the same IP that does not take the knowledge of my warning made yesterday and reintroduces Jack Black as a link. I have looked at the Jack Black article and I see it is obvious we're right in removing that link. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 10:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the best course of action would be to add a  comment explaining how the character is in no way related to the real-life person, just as a way of reducing the addition of this link. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 15:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added in the comment, no guarantee this would stop but good suggestion. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:17, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Buzz Lightyear of Star Command: The Adventure Begins, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:25, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Please fix the first sentence in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angry_Birds_Rio#Gameplay RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:00, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Valid point about my citations. Can anything be done so that the point about the backlash can be added?

Hey there, you have valid criticism on my poor citation from Backlogged user reviews and Reddit. However while my citations are bad, I do believe that the IGN Review becoming a hot button issue / the backlash to IGN’s review is a very relevant thing that should be mentioned in the reception. Do you have any ideas for a way that we could add it? I really do feel it’s a good addition even if I did it in all the wrong ways. LCarrieandCoco (talk) 21:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to write this. I agree that the IGN backlash could be noteworthy, but only if a reliable source that matches the topic is found. You can read the page Wikipedia:Reliable sources if you would like to know more about reliable sources. A good citation for this scenario would be a news/web article from a reliable source covering the IGN backlash. The review, not to mention the game itself, are both very recent, so it may take some time for one to appear. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 22:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]