User talk:Tempsb

test Tempsb (talk) 12:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources (the present sources are all connected with the organization), and needs to meet the requirements of WP:CORP. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 23:30, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence

Hello, Tempsb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence

Hello, Tempsb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:38, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tempsb! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Tempsb. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Hessian Centre for Artificial Intelligence, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:42, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Planned terminal 3

Hi, I saw that you stated that terminal 3 is planned in Berlin. However, I don't see that claim being made in the given source. Are you referring to the 'master plan 2040+'? I don't think that is a substantial plan, it's more like a dream. The airport is far from reaching its limits on capacity. The newspaper seems to suggest it will only be built if traffic rises fast. That makes it looks like it's not really planned yet, it's all hypothetical. The 'light' version means it won't be what Terminal 3 previously referred to. --Ysangkok (talk) 07:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I agree with you that the sentence was not precise.

Because of this I updated it to: "It was planned to build a Terminal 3 next to Terminal 2 by 2029.[147][148] This plan was delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic." ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Brandenburg_Airport#Projected_passenger_volume_and_expansion_plans )

Yes, I was referring to the 'master plan 2040+'. In the download PDF version of this it is written that the red terminal buildings are "Terminalentwicklung bis 2030" which means "Terminal development until 2030". And "T3" is red.

But to avoid misunderstandings I have added a second source:

https://www.morgenpost.de/flughafen-BER/article227402955/Aufsichtsrat-Bau-neuer-Terminals-am-BER-im-Plan.html

Until Covid there was serious planning for Terminal 3:

https://www.logo-infraconsult.de/anforderungsmanagement-neubau-terminal-3.html

https://www.airliners.de/ber-chef-terminal-2029-betrieb/52153

The plan to build Terminal 3 was delayed because of Covid.

To the newspaper that you linked:

If I understand it correctly, it says that probably until 2030 there is no need for Terminal 3.

But if the traffic rises really fast it could be that Terminal 3 is needed until 2030.

And that in general they still plan to build Terminal 3, but they want to wait for higher traffic numbers.

As far as I know "Terminal 3 light" is Terminal 3 at the same location in a low-cost version for low cost airlines, maybe a little bit smaller than original planned. Tempsb (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this answer, I think you're correct. Regarding what 'light' means, you can see in MAZ: "Kapazität von 6 bis 8 Millionen Passagieren im Jahr haben soll". But in 2018 the Berliner Zeitung wrote: "Erst nach der Fertigstellung dieses Neubaus [T3, that is], dessen Jahreskapazität von zwölf Millionen auf 18 Millionen steigen soll, wird SXF-Alt vom Netz gehen.". So it looks like light has the same capacity as non-light, since they both mention 6 million passengers per year. --Ysangkok (talk) 05:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this answer, and for the links!

I looked a bit into it.

For me it sounds linke this:

1. In the first plan T3 should have capacity for 12 million passengers per year (12 million is also written here: https://www.logo-infraconsult.de/anforderungsmanagement-neubau-terminal-3.html )

2. Later it was planned to make it larger, and to make it for 18 million passengers per year (15 million is written here: https://www.morgenpost.de/flughafen-BER/article227402955/Aufsichtsrat-Bau-neuer-Terminals-am-BER-im-Plan.html )

3. Because of Covid, they had the idea to make it smaller, "Terminal 3 light" with capacity for 6 or 8 million passengers per year (Maybe it will also be possible to expand it after it is completed)

Also as far as I know T3 is planned for low cost airlines. Tempsb (talk) 18:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Captions in airport infoboxes

Please do not add image captions to airport infoboxes. There is consensus to ommit these, that’s why you won’t find articles that have them. Best regards 2001:A61:1209:2C01:5DB3:A933:8C0:77CE (talk) 19:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]