User talk:Trillfendi

As of Indigenous Peoples' Day 2019, these are the ground rules around these parts: do not leave messages here unless it pertains to article creation, a Good Article nomination, an automated comment from a bot, a barnstar, an invitation to join a WikiProject, requesting help, or something important. Anything else will not be entertained. DISCRETION IS ADVISED.

December 2024

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Special:Diff/1263742897 Doug Weller talk 11:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

I don’t know if you need glasses or coffee but that edit wasn’t made by me… let alone I haven’t edited that page in over 3 years. Trillfendi (talk) 16:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Hate coffee, have glasses, and the ability to show you the edit you made then.[1].

Where in the source does it back your edit saying ". The dress's designer, Aurora James, also invited her boyfriend Benjamin Bronfman, the son of a billionaire. Critics, both conservative and liberal, rebuked Ocasio-Cortez for attending an event where guests were not required to wear masks (employees and event staff were required to do so), and one known for its opulent display of wealth and social status. She responded"? I've checked and can't find boyfriend, masks, etc. in the NYT article. Doug Weller talk 17:01, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

And your edit summary, "people are foaming at the mouth about this", is entirely inappropriate. Doug Weller talk 17:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Look, I don't know what possessed you to come to my talk page about some random edit I made 1,186 days ago, showing me a diff between two editors I've never interacted with. But I truly don't care, let alone never asked for your admonishment over how I comported myself 3 years ago. If you want to remove or change anything I did... 3 years ago... over something I never got into any conflict about, you don't need my permission to do that. So Merry Christmas and casse-toi. Trillfendi (talk) 17:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

I won't get lost yet. I saw the removal of your text and with my pretty insatiable curiosity used "Who wrote that" to see who made the edit, and it was you. Looks like you've never been warned before, I think most people would agree it was a serious BLP violation, but again, not something you've repeated. End of story so far as I'm concerned. Doug Weller talk 08:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Had this been the old me, I would’ve went back and forth with you and stood 10 toes on whatever I did but like I said, I don’t care. If you’re happy, I’m happy for you…. Trillfendi (talk) 17:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

You’ve clearly changed and for the better. Merry Christmas. Doug Weller talk 19:52, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2025

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 Online events: New: Music (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run A & B | Internet personalities Continuing: #1day1woman (year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2024 Announcements from other communities Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2025 Participate in #1Lib1Ref Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025 Tip of the month: Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:52, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

2025 Update from Women in Green

Hello Trillfendi:

2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history and another on women around the world. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved!

For 2025 we have a new set of goals for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you!

This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around!

Grnrchst (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:47, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2025

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331 Online events: New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search Suggestion: Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2025

Women in Red | March 2025, Vol 11, Issue 3, Nos. 326, 327, 332, 333, 334 Online events: New: Alphabet run E & F | Artists+Activists | Women of the Arab World Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music Announcements from other communities: March editathons around the world Celebrate Women 2025 office hour series Tip of the month: You can access the Wikipedia Library if you have made 500+ edits, and 6+ months editing, and 10+ edits in the last 30 days, and No active blocks Moving the needle: 27 Jan 2025: 20.031% of biographies on EN-WP are about women (2,047,793 bios, 410,200 women) 23 Dec 2024: 20.009% (2,041,741 bios, 408,531 women) Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:53, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

References

Precious anniversary

Precious

Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:37, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Category:Victoria's Secret Angels has been nominated for deletion

Category:Victoria's Secret Angels has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 13:43, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Victoria's Secret Angels

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Victoria's Secret Angels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_July_8#Category:Victoria's_Secret_Angels. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --woodensuperman 15:21, 13 March 2025 (UTC)