User talk:VirtualVagabond

Welcome!

Hello, VirtualVagabond, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:47, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I'm Nemoralis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Shirakavan, Armenia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nemoralis (talk) 05:36, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Nemoralis (talk) 05:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) VirtualVagabond (talk) 08:34, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed required

It has come to my attention that you have recently started to edit in articles related to Armenia and Azerbaijan, this editing area is under a community imposed extended-confirmed restriction. Your number of edits is below the threshold for editing in the area, thus you cannot currently edit in articles and content related to Armenia or Azerbaijan, please refrain from doing so, any edits you have done since this restriction was implemented should be reverted, I will take the liberty of reverting wherever it's appropriate. Nemoralis (talk) 12:42, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, could you tell me the edit threshold? VirtualVagabond (talk) 07:31, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:XC Nemoralis (talk) 07:33, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2011 Diyarbakir Ambush (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2011 Diyarbakir Ambush and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phuzion (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VirtualVagabond! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Phuzion (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2011 Silvan Ambush has been accepted

2011 Silvan Ambush, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of massacres against Hazaras

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of massacres against Hazaras, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1950 Afghan invasion of Pakistan

The article 1950 Afghan invasion of Pakistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreliable sources, entirely based on one source, and nothing from other sources from what I have seen even corroborates this event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Noorullah (talk) 01:26, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1950 Afghan invasion of Pakistan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1950 Afghan invasion of Pakistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1950 Afghan invasion of Pakistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Noorullah (talk) 05:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. VirtualVagabond (talk) 06:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1950 afghan invasion of Pakistan

Hi I have sources about this battles that it was afghan victory Blurewhale11 (talk) 20:24, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please show. VirtualVagabond (talk) 21:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, VirtualVagabond. Thank you for your work on Operation Zarb-e-Ahan. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:53, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Zaheer Ahmad Babar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jatt and Punjabi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Economy of Pakistan

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Economy of Pakistan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:48, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. VirtualVagabond (talk) 11:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asim Munir

Doesn’t matter, reliable sources have emerged that Ahmed Shah is part of his name, and is even on his yearbook...

Prove your statement DaDefeender (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I already linked a source, and search up his yearbook. VirtualVagabond (talk) 14:29, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan elections fraud 2024 edit reference quotations

I was on a course of adding ref. quotations, but you didn't gave me time. There is plenty available. If you think some or all of them are not reliable or adequate you can contact me. I think the ref. should be inserted at the end of the paragraphs, there many on the middle, from the previous editor.

Bolt Kjerag

CS1 error on Ziaism

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ziaism, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:58, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Asim Munir

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Asim Munir, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed VirtualVagabond (talk) 17:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, VirtualVagabond. Thank you for your work on Gadchiroli clash. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thank you! VirtualVagabond (talk) 18:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chief of Army staff

please let me change as approved per the approved. Its a humble request. CPPConstruct (talk) 04:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the controversy on ISPR Page.

please let me change as approved per the approved. Its a humble request. CPPConstruct (talk) 04:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What would you like to change? I recommend you to use the talk page on the ISPR page, that way, we can all discuss the changes we can do to the page. VirtualVagabond (talk) 08:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022 Leicester unrest, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 18:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pakistan grave necrophilia hoax for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pakistan grave necrophilia hoax is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistan grave necrophilia hoax until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— Saqib (talk I contribs) 08:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]