User talk:WikiConDraft

Welcome!

Hello, WikiConDraft, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CNMall41 (talk) 18:45, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malati (Cast) (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Malati (Cast) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiConDraft! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacar Adhikari (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacar Adhikari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:41, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emiway Bantai (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emiway Bantai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:44, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Two points about drafts

Please don't review drafts and move them to articles unless and until you become accepted as a reviewer at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants, which will not happen until you have considerably more experience. This applies with particular force in the case of accepting a draft which has already been declined by an experienced reviewer.
Don't remove declined AfC submissions or comments from drafts which have not yet been accepted as articles. JBW (talk) 23:22, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks for assist WikiConDraft 23:25, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I will take care from now on and become a Wikipedia contributor and try to be good at it Thanks User:JBW WikiConDraft 23:38, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 01:46, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Emiway Bantai. bonadea contributions talk 09:09, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:WikiConDraft, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WikiConDraft|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 11:24, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 11:58, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiConDraft 12:25, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LLM reply collapsed per WP:AITALK

Thank you for your message, and I sincerely apologize for the misunderstanding and any violation of Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

I confirm that I am not a paid editor, and I have not been directly or indirectly compensated for any of my edits. My contributions were made purely out of interest and with the intent of improving public knowledge on certain topics, not for promotional purposes.

I understand the seriousness of the paid editing policy and will be more cautious going forward. I truly appreciate the efforts of the Wikipedia community to uphold transparency and neutrality. If any of my edits gave the wrong impression, I am willing to correct or remove them as necessary.

Once again, I apologize, and I will make sure to strictly follow Wikipedia’s content and conduct guidelines from now on. WikiConDraft 12:26, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. .

Stop creating articles in mainspace about non-notable people, and stop moving your own drafts to mainspace. It can take a long time for new editors to fully understand notability requirements, which is why the Articles for Creation process exists. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:57, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WikiConDraft 09:00, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LLM reply collapsed per WP:AITALK

Dear Bonadea,

Thank you for your message, and I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused by my recent contributions. I now understand that I may have misunderstood Wikipedia's notability guidelines and the correct procedure for creating new articles. I truly appreciate the importance of maintaining high editorial standards on Wikipedia.

Moving forward, I will make sure to use the Articles for Creation (AfC) process and avoid moving drafts directly into the mainspace without appropriate review. I am here to learn and contribute constructively, and I genuinely respect the work and time of experienced editors like you.

Once again, I’m very sorry for the mistakes and truly grateful for your guidance.

Kind regards,

YourUsername WikiConDraft 09:01, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), you may be blocked from editing. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 10:58, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taleju (goddess) (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please stop canvassing as well. Drafts are reviewed in time through AfC with no preference given.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taleju (goddess) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 01:49, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you review this draft WikiConDraft 01:50, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Advice regarding AI-generated content

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia :). I noticed your userpage seems to be generated using artificial intelligence. That's okay, but please don't use AI-generated content, like ChatGPT's responses, to write content. AIs like ChatGPT are prone to subtle errors and it's generally more trouble than it's worth to write on Wikipedia with them. Thank you. —The Sophocrat (talk) 03:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir I respect your point very much and I will give my best in the Wikipedia article WikiConDraft 03:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bilal Shaikh (rapper) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bilal Shaikh (rapper). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Charlie (talk) 06:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create new drafts about topics that have already been declined. You can't pretend that you didn't know that there was an existing draft about Bilal Shaikh / Emiway Bantai. Your removing all the reviewer comments and other content from Draft:Emiway Bantai and then copying the draft text to Draft:Bilal Shaikh (rapper) was dishonest and a waste of the volunteer reviewers' time.

What is your connection to Bilal Shaikh? --bonadea contributions talk 09:16, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To be precise, Bonadea, WikiConDraft created the new page at Bilal Shaikh (rapper), and CharlieMehta then moved it to to Draft:Bilal Shaikh (rapper).
WikiConDraft, both blanking of the original draft and creating a new copy of it as an article were done after you had read and acknowledged the message above telling you not to move drafts to articles without being a reviewer and also not to remove declined AfC submissions or comments from drafts which have not yet been accepted as articles. It is fairly obvious that what you did was a deliberate attempt to get round those instructions. If you do anything intended to dishonestly hide what you are doing again you may well be blocked from editing, without further warning.
Copying the content of a page to which one or more other people have contributed and posting it to another page, without saying that you are doing so, is not only dishonest and contrary to Wikipedia policy, but it is also illegal, because it infringes copyright. Don't do that again.
Above, Bonadea has asked you "What is your connection to Bilal Shaikh?" You have continued to edit without answering her; you may like to answer now. JBW (talk) 22:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mahendra Shishu Secondary School, Dharmapur moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mahendra Shishu Secondary School, Dharmapur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page; please do not move the page back yourself. bonadea contributions talk 20:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tali (Achham) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tali (Achham). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page; please do not move the page back yourself. bonadea contributions talk 20:07, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahendra Shishu Secondary School, Dharmapur (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahendra Shishu Secondary School, Dharmapur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:10, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Dilraj Singh Rawat

Hello WikiConDraft, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dilraj Singh Rawat, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dilraj Singh Rawat (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GrabUp - Talk 08:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sacar Adhikari moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sacar Adhikari (2). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Very poor sourcing; probably LLM generated; copypasted into mainspace after AfC decline. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 06:33, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacar Adhikari (2) (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Sacar Adhikari, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacar Adhikari (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:48, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Salin Man Bania moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Salin Man Bania. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and It has no independent sources, and a lot of it is unsourced . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 14:31, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salin Man Bania (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Salin Man Bania and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 14:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ashish Chalchalani moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ashish Chalchalani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Long-term spamming. Would certainly have to go through AfC (but shouldn't be accepted there as there is zero indication of notability). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. bonadea contributions talk 11:23, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sourav Joshi (YouTuber) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sourav Joshi (YouTuber). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Long-term spamming by various paid outfits; this was clearly created at this title to circumvent salting of Sourav Joshi.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 11:28, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sourav Joshi (YouTuber) (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No independent sources. There has been a long-term spamming campaign involving drafts and articles about this individual, see the logs for Sourav Joshi (which is create protected), for Draft:Sourav Joshi, and for this draft page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sourav Joshi (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 11:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sourav Joshi (YouTuber) (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No significant change to the draft, a couple of paid promotional sources added. This is (presumably paid) spam.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sourav Joshi (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 12:38, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abhishek Malhan (June 9)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No claim to notability, no independent sources, nothing that wasn't in the AfD deleted article. Almost certainly UPE.

bonadea contributions talk 14:02, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lakshay Chaudhary (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lakshay Chaudhary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 20:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apoorva Mukhija (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Apoorva Mukhija and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 05:44, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apoorva Mukhija moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Apoorva Mukhija. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest, it consists of machine-generated text and Quarantine likely UPE. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Do not move it back to mainspace yourself. bonadea contributions talk 07:53, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025 (2)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. JFHJr (㊟) 02:59, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Unrelated question: Have you ever edited as "RAJAKC"? Just wondering. It would help us greatly in moving things along for you at ANI (my post), WP:BLPN (your own post), and beyond. Help us understand! JFHJr (㊟) 03:52, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:NithanjOn per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RAJAKC. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 06:05, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]