User talk:Wikitza

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Wikitza, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Satu Suro 04:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attributing motives to countries

Surely if a country can be "eager" (your wording) it can also be "envious"? In fact, as you are probably aware, it is a standard way of speaking to ascribe motives, feelings and actions to countries. It's not just me saying so, and it's a misunderstanding to say this is what Wikipedia describes as a "POV". The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick^t 14:56, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tomé Pires

Hello there. thanks you for your edit to Tomé Pires. Could you please place those references as in-line cites rather than a list at the end. Did you really use all those refs to create the additional info. Any that weren't directly used, should go into a list of "Further Reading". thanks --Merbabu (talk) 12:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copying material from other articles

If you are going to copy material from other articles, often a bad idea if the other material isn't cited, you must indicate what article it came from, the easiest permanent way to do this is with a wikilink in the edit summary. This is an absolute requirement as that is the only way attribution to the original editor can be traced. Not to do this is actually a copyright violation as it breaks our licenses. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 13:45, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Links to the licenses are right under this edit window, where it says you release your contributions. As for the 'arguably' language, what's interesting about that is that it is word for word from one of Gavin Menzies' pages, however that is copyright 2008 and the text in the Cantino article was added 19 October 2007. I'm trying to get the Internet archives to tell more more about the Menzies page, but it isn't working right now. In any case, it's unsourced and I all I could find is that the other map says 1500 on it. Dougweller (talk) 16:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Iberian Pyrite Belt

On May 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Iberian Pyrite Belt, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 06:02, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diffie reference

Hi. I looked at the pages you cited for Diffie's Foundations of the Portuguese empire, 1415-1580, but I couldn't find all the info you added from those pages. For example, Rafael Perestrello landing on the coast of China in 1513 isn't mentioned. His name also doesn't come up when you search that book on GoogleBooks. Could you help clarify your sources? Thanks. Jonas Poole (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Álvares Cabral

Hello! The article about Pedro Álvares Cabral has passed through a major overhaul (from this [1] to this [2]). It has since been nominated to featured status (See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pedro Álvares Cabral/archive1). I've noticed that you have interest in the subject of the Age of Discovery so if you find some time, please make a comment there if you support or not its nomination. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 19:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]