User:Doug Weller
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IP Rangeblock Calculator | IP Range Edit Check | Checkusers | Oversighters |
User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI
| Main namespace | |
|---|---|
| Other namespaces | |
| All namespaces | |
| Navboxes with templates |
|
| Inline images | |
| Help pages | |
| Related topics | |
| Search | |
| Immediate requests | Entries |
|---|---|
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 42 |
| Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests | 108 |
| Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests | 83 |
| Wikipedia template-protected edit requests | 27 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 5 |
| Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests | 49 |
| Requested RD1 redactions | 5 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 12 |
| Open sockpuppet investigations | 22 |
| Click here to locate other admin backlogs | |
Administrative backlog
Reports
User-reported
- 182.253.57.207 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Edit summary alone is incomprehensible but targeted vandalism against another user. I suspect a genuine issue of mental health. Hullian111 (talk) 22:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted the edit summary, don't see a need to block someone from half a day ago. Izno (talk) 22:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Izno Just an FYI to all concerned, this person jumps on a new IP every day and posts nonsensical ramblings on Simple Wikipedia [1][2][3] and occasionally elsewhere, The moment you revert them you end up in their edit summaries, Haven't got the foggiest as to why they hate WP so much but there we are, I just report them to SRG (naming them "the raging lunatic") and move on but locally blocking won't achieve much as they post the same nonsensical shite on other projects too, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) So a global rangeblock is needed? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:49, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Izno Just an FYI to all concerned, this person jumps on a new IP every day and posts nonsensical ramblings on Simple Wikipedia [1][2][3] and occasionally elsewhere, The moment you revert them you end up in their edit summaries, Haven't got the foggiest as to why they hate WP so much but there we are, I just report them to SRG (naming them "the raging lunatic") and move on but locally blocking won't achieve much as they post the same nonsensical shite on other projects too, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 23:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted the edit summary, don't see a need to block someone from half a day ago. Izno (talk) 22:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- FinnishCyberSecurity (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 02:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- JinJiyanAzadî E z id i (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Sockpuppet of Piermark. quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 02:52, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2600:1013:0:0:0:0:0:0/32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – Long-term abuse. C F A 03:12, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- 83.203.20.206 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – This is the same ip that has just been blocked for false references, derogatory comments about Jews etc. Knitsey (talk) 03:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- 76.67.115.228 (talk · contribs) was the previously blocked ip Knitsey (talk) 03:19, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
|
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion backlog
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 13 items Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Abcdfghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz25 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Redditart (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Sampoorneshbabusingam123 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "abusing" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Kingkiller De-Rabbit (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "killer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Jimble gunglesuck (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "suck" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Username36335678 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TheMelonOfficialYT (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Kadumi Entertainment (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See edit summary of [4]. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:10, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Given a welcome-coi and the edit summary deleted as it contained an email address. - The Bushranger One ping only 21:08, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- EARTHELECTRO EARTHING POWER SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Qualifies to be blocked per {{subst:uw-causeblock}}. Agent 007 (talk) 18:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Poop28371 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Always with the poop :/. Knitsey (talk) 00:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Somalimuqdishunationalist (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Erring on the side of caution here, but I feel that having the word "Nationalist" implies some form of disruption. Gaismagorm (talk) 01:06, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- actually, never mind, I think just discussing with them should be enough Gaismagorm (talk) 01:07, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – per feeding tube. JayCubby 19:03, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. All vandal accounts have been globally locked. Daniel Case (talk) 22:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP repeatedly attempting to push POV. The Kip (contribs) 19:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2600:8800:FF0E:300:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from portal namespace for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 22:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/BTSZ has been causing problems again. Protection recently expired. Note the length of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar/Archive. Leijurv (talk) 21:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/BTSZ has been causing problems again. Protection recently expired. Note the length of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belteshazzar/Archive. Leijurv (talk) 21:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also note this section where Belteshazzar tried to canvas other editors to his edits. Leijurv (talk) 21:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jet Pilot (talk) 22:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Continued addition of incorrect information by a range of IP addresses. DH85868993 (talk) 22:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: A lot of IP and SPA (including sockpuppeteers) vandalism in recent weeks, particularly over the subject's nationality, including users arguing that he is not French because of his ethnicity. Subject is a racing driver with an ongoing move to Formula One (debuts in March). MB2437 22:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Bing and other sites recently posted articles of a crocodile related to him that died earlier yesterday, people keep thinking he died, incorrectly. EF5 23:19, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – Doxxing and vandalism, User:SpaceFan1233 keep adding private info in one of the edits even after the page got protected, the user also added a "good article" template for no reason on the page. Http iosue (talk) 23:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- again, same with last time, can you delete the revision history too. Http iosue (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent IP WP:BLOCKEVASION. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism Wowzers122 (talk) 00:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since Saturday there have been repeated IP changes to this page with incorrect information regarding the outcome of his latest boxing boot. A short period of page protection may hopefully bring and end to this. Shrug02 (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: "Far-right" descriptor in lead has been repeatedly removed by IPs Firecat93 (talk) 01:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- (As well as new, non-semi protected users, such as this revision on 12/14/2024: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Marine_Le_Pen&diff=prev&oldid=1263104515) Firecat93 (talk) 01:11, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Someone is bearing a grudge, switching IP every day to vandalize the article. Previous protections were for three months, obviously not long enough for the vandal to cool down. Chrisahn (talk) 01:49, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- List of countries and territories where German is an official language (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There seems to be a rampant sockpuppet situation going on here. We need at least to have a breath to figure out what's going on. There are multiple accounts making the same edits to delete established content or add specious material. Largoplazo (talk) 01:52, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jet Pilot (talk) 02:51, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just like Skibidi or Skibidi Toilet or Sigma, this article has a high chance of being vandalised. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 02:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason: WP:FORUM violations on talk and unexplained wholesale removal of content that was left unchecked for 2 weeks. Borgenland (talk) 03:11, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Protection is too high and it was for sockpuppetry in 2018. It's nearly 2025 now so if it needs protecting just do pending changes or semi-protection but unprotection would be better I think. 147.10.234.99 (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging protecting admin User:Ponyo, who might or might not wish to have input. I looked at the history of disruption and it looks pretty bad. I'm inclined to give semi protection a shot (this would eliminate 95% of the disruption in page history), but I'd rather hear from the sysop who made the call first. BusterD (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Unprotection: The action of semiprotecting this article was back in 2011, and the edit summary says something about an OTRS ticket from 2008 - regardless, the article has little views and littler edits, so I think page protection now is unnecessary. LR.127 (talk) 23:09, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Change 16,000 civilians (May 2024)[43] to 16,000 civilians (May 2024)[42]
Source 42 has these numbers and source 43 doesn't Alderman pained dios finnish (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Hayden Panettiere artricle: Joe Somebody (2001) with Tim Allen
Why have you unreverted my revision on the Hayden Panettiere artricle by removing Joe Somebody (2001) with Tim Allen? 86.130.33.243 (talk) 22:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
- Pinging @Soetermans:. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification, Jéské Couriano. Because of long term abuse, my talk page is edit protected. As stated on top of this page, you could've easily used Talk: Hayden Panettiere to start a discussion and could've mentioned me there. A lead of a biographical article is supposed to mention the most important bits. Joe Somebody is not culturally or commercially significant and has had no impact upon her career. Besides, why did you undo my revision in the first place? soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:32, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- I have used Talk: Hayden Panettiere. And Joe Somebody may have received negative reviews but one award nomination went to Panettiere. And that should be on Disney+ UK. As well as Raising Helen and Tiger Cruise. 86.130.33.243 (talk) 23:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Not done for the reasons explained above. Favonian (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Change his 2021 portrait to a newer one. Contact me further on my talk page to question this. 2601:483:400:1CD0:9C73:48C7:B39B:6E31 (talk) 18:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- That assumes we have a newer one to use. Unless it's uploaded to Commons we can't use a newer image; if a newer one does exist on Commons you need to link it here. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 19:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 5 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:00, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
| 28 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 01:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I respectfully request autopatrol and patrol rights, based on my extensive experience and contributions to Wikipedia. With over 12 months of experience, I've created 60+ articles and improved 100+ others. Granting my request will streamline the New Page Patrol process. I previously requested these rights last month, which was denied. Since then, I've improved my contributions. I believe my dedication and improvement warrant reconsideration. Thank you for considering my request. Royalesignature (talk). 03:08, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting autopatrolled rights mainly to streamline article creation so that my new articles would be reviewed faster. I have written around 40 articles, mostly about ants, and I would like to get this right to get the articles reviewed faster and reduce workload for new page patrollers. I have been an editor for four years, and my recent new articles have had no issues whatsoever from the reviewers. I will use this right responsibly, and it will be my pleasure to continue assisting my community in updating old articles and creating new content. 2003 LN6 06:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
I am writing to request for Autopatrolled right so as to ensure there is reduction in the workload of NPP process. Having created articles that conform to the content policies of Wikipedia and also learning from other experienced editors' suggestions to improve articles over the years, I believe this request is deserving, supported and this user right will be granted. Thanks Aderiqueza (talk) 19:32, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
I have made a few articles that seem to be fine, and probably worth a consideration for this permission. Crafterstar (talk) 01:38, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
apologies for wasting your time. Crafterstar (talk) 20:54, 21 December 2024 (UTC) Schwede66, if you are willing to look at the articles created here, from #371 to #383, then
Nominating this editor for Autopatrolled based on a long history of high-quality page creation (80 new articles created in mainspace, with just one deleted a few years ago). Good encyclopedic style, excellent use of sources, images, formatting etc.; also creates talk pages. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Hi, I am requesting for this rights, because I have about 5 new articles that are yet to be reviewed and surely meets the notability criteria, I have been creating and improving articles especially on African Cinema and with this right, I hope to reduce the backlog on the new page reviewers log. Best regards, B.Korlah (talk) 06:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Panda Arun (talk) 20:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
Hi, I am re-requesting AWB perms. It was last denied because I had shown zero need for it but this time, I think I do have a reason. I had recently created Niagara (electoral district) and Middlesex North from a (redirect) to a Disambiguation page, and it has links. I would like to use AWB to update the links, and make it point to the right pages. I'm thinking there could be more "redirect-to-disambigaution" pages that would need updating links. Crafterstar (talk) 19:16, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to have AWB permission to do simple maintenance edits, like fixing typos or fixing links to disambiguation pages, more easily. Milo8505 (talk) 19:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Plan to use this to mass create and categorize redirects, as well as mass tagging pages with {{long comment}}. mwwv converse∫edits 14:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
I noticed that Ozzie10aaaa has posted AfC barnstars on dozens of user talk pages, containing unclosed code that should be closed with |} to ensure the style doesn't spill out to the rest of the talk page ([7]). I would like to use AWB to fix this. Also, I might need it occasionally for post-move cleanup on dozens of pages. Frost 18:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed
Reason for requesting confirmed rights I have been on Wikipedia for almost 30 days and have over 500 edits, I don’t believe I have gotten a notification that I am confirmed. If I have, please notify me. Yuanmongolempiredynasty (talk) 16:27, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed
Reason for Request: I am requesting reinstatement of Extended Confirmed Rights after their removal by User:ScottishFinnishRadish for concerns related to "gaming EC through adding a machine translation of Fondation Maeght and Rueil-Malmaison in many small edits without attribution." He asked me to "make at least a few hundred edits" to regain it. I understand the importance of maintaining trust and adhering to Wikipedia’s policies, and I’ve since reflected on how to better contribute responsibly. Since the removal, I have added attribution to the concerned articles. I have made over 300 referenced contributions, focusing on adding reliable sources to improve verifiability, expanding content in alignment with Wikipedia’s standards, and enhancing article quality. I believe my recent contributions demonstrate constructive and policy-compliant editing. Examples of Recent Contributions: Water metering, Smart meter, and Gas meter, which are in my area of expertise. Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Serfunoheda (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2024 (UTC) Hello! I would like to get a permission, so I can translate a page. I've been registered in Wikipedia for a long period and I made quiet a lot of edits. Thank you in advance!
On November 28 my EC permissions has been restored by Chetsford (talk · contribs) for 30 days, and I was told that prior to expiration I should return here and request it to be permanently added to my account.
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator |
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
For the NPP backlog drive. This is my second time participating in one of these drives (hopefully I will be healthier and less busy this time...) -1ctinus📝🗨 02:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
The January backlog drive seems interesting and I need something to do over Christmas break/beyond. I applied for a month-long trial a while back, but was having some mental health issues and just didn't use the tools or even re-apply. My AfC log is relatively lengthy over a period of 3 months. A note about my AfD stats, they are inaccurate. For some reason, when changing my name from "Sir MemeGod" to "EF5", XTools bugged out and only shows random AfDs I've filed/commented on (hence the 90-or-so "no vote detected" ones). EF5 17:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
I've been an AFC reviewer (probationary since March 24). I was off-wiki for some time to take a long break, but I'm back again. Can I get this right for a temporary period of 7 days? I want to explore the difference between New Page Curation and AFC tools. I will request a few more trials later before taking it permanently. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
In August, I was granted the new page reviewer permission temporarily (link). Due to some IRL stuff I wasn't very active with it, though none of my reviews were problematic. With the upcoming January 2025 Backlog drive, I'd like to re-request the permission to help reduce the backlog. Skyshiftertalk 15:56, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
As an editor with over 80,000 edits since joining in 2015, I'm also a pending changes reviewer. I've moved over 2,000 pages during my time, made over 200 edits at WP:RM/TR to request uncontroversial page moves and participated almost 400 times in requested moves. My immediate need for this permission stems from my efforts to retitle redirects in line with policies such as WP:CONCISE and WP:PRECISE. I'm currently unable to move dozens of redirects I've created to more appropriate titles because the desired titles already exist with different tags. This process would be far more efficient with the page mover tool, allowing me to address these titles without requiring frequent requests at WP:RM/TR. Thanks, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:48, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Good evening! I have had this permission on a temporary basis on May 20th of this year. I had then requested an extension of said right but was declined on the basis of weak communication capabilities and questionable RM closures being made during my trial. Four months passed, and I therefore request to receive the right (okay for another temporary basis to prove my competency). A month ago, I returned to wp:RM/TR clerking, contesting certain requests and processing them. I could only process (fulfill) the simplest requests, that is, requests that don't require use of the I am also planning to return back to NPP and AFC activity, due to the fact that I will be on holiday (and therefore, increased online activity) and due to the upcoming backlog drive for the former. For obvious reasons, I will not (and must not) work in the requested moves venue outside RM/TR (disclaimer:I have been topic banned from closing/relisting discussions four months ago). I have also improved my communication skills and will try to be as clear as possible. I am open to any questions regarding this request or my competency. Thank you for reading my request. ToadetteEdit (talk) 15:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Reason for Requesting page mover rights. Panda Arun (talk) 20:53, 23 December 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Have close to 1,100 edits as of making this request. I enjoy improving articles, I review recent changes daily by this point and am familiar with reverting vandalism (and distinguishing it from good faith edits). Having this right would mean I can instantly decline bad faith pending edits as soon as I see them. I have read and understood the relevant policies and guidelines relating to pending changes, vandalism and copyright. Beachweak (talk) 14:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Recently, i've been reverting vandalism and disruptive edits on Wikipedia with Twinkle and Ultraviolet, and as an extended-confirmed user, I have over 850 edits. I also revert good faith edits, and if I get this request accepted I will be able to reject vandalism put on pending changes (on pending changes). 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
I am an active editor with page creation review rights and over 5,000 edits to date. I try to keep my edits neutral and have a history of working with others on some contentious topics. If I make a mistake, I try to fix it and apologise as soon as possible. I have a good grasp of WP policy and MOS, and understand the difference between vandalism, tendentious editing and unconstructive editing. I've also got a very good grasp of copyright law (UK and US) and plagiarism due to my academic and professional background. Lewisguile (talk) 09:08, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request the pending changes reviewer right for the following reasons: 1. I am highly active in anti vandalism areas of the enwiki (AIV, RPP, etc, I even contributed to SPI) so I know what vandalism looks like when I see it. 2. I see a lot of constructive edits when I am on the "recent changes" section, that go unnoticed for quite a while. Plasticwonder (talk) 18:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
I have been reverting vandalism since I created my account. Although it appears I am a new user, I also have experience editing Wikipedia and reverting vandalism as an IP for many years (which I will not be disclosing due to security concerns). The rollback right will help me revert vandalism faster, which is why I am requesting it. PersonAccount 🐉 (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I've been patrolling Recent Changes for a few months now. Rollback will help my work, especially when I'm out and about and can only access the app. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
I would like rollback to help me combat vandalism more effectively. I currently use recent changes and RedWarn. I feel that I have the experience necessary to handle vandalism in a constructive manner. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 04:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi! Though I started out doing grammar fixes, over the past 2 weeks, I've been using Twinkle and RedWarn to revert any vandalism seen on Special:RecentChanges. It's understandable if you'd like to impose the hard and fast rule of 1-month experience, but I've made almost 300 edits related to vandalism. I always leave a message for the editor and undo my revert in cases where I question my decision in hindsight and would rather have another pair of eyes look at the edit(s). Having the rollback permission would make RedWarn reverting faster for me and would also allow me to try out other anti-vandalism tools like Huggle. Could I have the right please? randomdude121 (leave a message!) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
I view that having this user right would help in fighting vandalism a lot faster. I know I would be far more efficient with fighting vandalism if I were to be granted Rollback. I have been editing for over 7 months, and I have well over 5140 edits, with a focus on mitigating abuse on the wiki. I am a frequent contributor to AIV and RPP. Plasticwonder (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
|
.
Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
|
|
- User:Uncle G/On common Google Books mistakes
- Newbie edits to templates
- Tagged speedy removed
- Tagged possible BLP issues
- Tagged article blanking
- Tagged shouting
- Tagged nonsense characters
- Tagged repeating characters
- Tagged possible vandalism
- Tagged possible userpage spam
- Tagged possible link spam #1
- Tagged possible link spam #2
|
Barnstars
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
| For adhereing to Wikipedia policies, professionalism, providing answers when needed, and for your help even though we do not agree on every detail. Thank you! Dr. Persi (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| for consistently prompt action against miscreants. The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service for Wikipedia's Caucasus related topics.--Yacatisma (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC) |
- Members of the Fifteen Year Society of Wikipedia editors
- Wikipedia administrators
- Wikipedians in Florida
- Wikipedians in Miami
- Wikipedians in the United Kingdom
- British Wikipedians
- Wikipedia oversighters
- Wikipedians who use Discord
- Wikipedians who have been selected as Editor of the Week
- WikiProject Archaeology participants
- Wikipedia Volunteer Response Team members
- Wikipedians by alma mater: Yale University
- Wikipedia administrators willing to handle RevisionDelete requests
- Wikipedians with MS degrees
- Wikipedians who have access to Project MUSE
- Members of the Ten Year Society of Wikipedia editors
- Wikipedians by alma mater: London School of Economics