Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by AnomieBOT (talk) when the backlog is cleared. |
 | Skip to current discussions · |
| Deletion discussions |
|---|
|
|
| Articles |
| Templates and modules |
| Files |
| Categories |
| Redirects |
| Miscellany |
| Speedy deletion |
| Proposed deletion |
| V | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 57 |
| TfD | 0 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 14 |
| MfD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| FfD | 0 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
| RfD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 46 | 47 |
| AfD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 17 |
Categories for discussion (CfD) is the central venue for discussing specific proposals to delete, merge, rename or split categories and stub types in accordance with the guidelines for categorization, category naming and stub articles.
For detailed instructions about using CfD, see "How to use CfD" below. Briefly, nominations are handled through one of two processes:
- Speedy renaming and merging, for uncontroversial proposals that meet specified criteria—see "Speedy renaming and merging" below.
- Full discussion, for all other proposals. Discussions typically remain open for at least seven days and are closed once a rough consensus has formed or no objections to the nomination are raised.
Except in uncontroversial cases such as reverting vandalism, do not amend or depopulate a category once it has been nominated at CfD as this hampers other editors' efforts to evaluate a category and participate in the discussion.
Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a CfD request that is limited in scope to renaming, as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the request closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of a CfD move discussion to determine whether or not the close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines. CfDs involving deletion should be reviewed at Wikipedia:Deletion review.
Scope
[edit]CfD is intended only for specific proposals to delete, merge, rename or split categories or stub types. For general discussion about how to improve the category system, use other appropriate venues such as Wikipedia talk:Categorization, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Categories, and any relevant WikiProjects' talk pages.
Current discussions
[edit]
Closing procedure
[edit]After seven days, an administrator (or possibly a non-admin) will determine if consensus has formed, and close the discussion. If appropriate, the discussion instead may be relisted to allow for more discussion. Editors closing discussions must follow the administrator instructions and implement the result or log it at the Working page to ensure it is implemented. As noted at Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions, non-admins may follow the process at Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Working, and list discussion results there for an admin to review, and to log to the page directly.
Discussions awaiting closure
[edit]- List of links to individual open discussions (>7 days old): Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Old unclosed discussions - updated by User:AnomieBOT
- Full text of all open discussions (>7 days old): Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/All old discussions - powered by a Lua module parsing /Old unclosed discussions
- List of days with open discussions (>7 days old): included below from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Awaiting closure – powered by a Lua module parsing /Old unclosed discussions
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 May 9 (10 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 May 8 (20 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 May 7 (26 open)
- Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 May 1 (1 open)
How to nominate a category for discussion
[edit]Nomination procedure
[edit]Twinkle
[edit]You may use Twinkle to facilitate CfD nominations. To install Twinkle, go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and check "Twinkle" in the "Browsing" section. Use the now-installed "XfD" (Start a deletion discussion) tab while viewing the page you want to nominate.
Twinkle only allows you to nominate a single category or stub template. For bundled nominations including multiple categories, see § MassCFD.
MassCFD
[edit]You can use the script User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/massXFD to automatically make mass nominations.
Manual nominations
[edit]| I | Preliminary steps.
Before nominating a category:
In the following special cases:
For further information, see Wikipedia:Categorization and Wikipedia:Manual of Style. |
| II | Edit the category.
Add one of the following templates at the beginning of the category page (not the talk page) of every category to be discussed. For nominations involving large numbers of categories, help adding these templates can be requested here.
|
| III | Create the CFD section.
Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries. Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) to copy and paste one of the templates below. When inserting category names into these template's parameters, except the
|
Stub types
[edit]| I | Preliminary steps.
In general, a stub type consists of a stub template and a dedicated stub category. Before nominating a stub type for deletion, merging or renaming:
|
| II | Edit the template.
Add one of the following tags at the beginning of the template to be discussed.
|
| III | Create the CFD section.
Click THIS LINK to edit the section of CfD for today's entries. Follow the instructions (visible in edit mode) and paste the following text (remember to update the default parameters):
|
Notifying interested projects and editors
[edit]In addition to the steps listed above, you may choose to invite participation by editors who are likely to be informed about a nominated category. All such efforts must comply with Wikipedia's guideline against biased canvassing. In addition, to help make your messages about the CfD discussion clear, avoid Wikipedia-specific abbreviations, link to relevant policies or guidelines, and link to the discussion itself.
- Notifying related WikiProjects
WikiProjects consist of groups of editors who are interested in a particular subject. If a nominated category is within the scope of one or more WikiProjects, consider adding a brief, neutral note on their talk page(s) about the nomination. You may use {{subst:cfd notice|Category name|2025 May 17|CfD section name}} ~~~~ or write a personalized message.
Tagging the nominated category's talk page with a relevant WikiProject's banner will include the category in that WikiProject's Article Alerts if they subscribe to the system. For instance, tagging a nominated category with {{WikiProject Physics}} will add the discussion to Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Article alerts.
- Notifying substantial contributors to the category
While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and main contributors of the category that you are nominating for discussion. To find the creator and main contributors, check the category's page history or talk page. You may use {{Cfd notice}} to inform the category's creator and all other editors.
- Notifying other interested editors
It may be helpful to invite other subject-matter experts by posting a message on the talk page of the most closely related article, such as Protein family for Category:Protein families. You may use {{Cfdnotice}} for this.
Speedy renaming and merging
| This page has a backlog that requires the attention of willing editors. Please remove this notice when the backlog is cleared. |
Speedy renaming or speedy merging of categories may be requested only if they meet a speedy criterion, for example WP:C2D (consistency with main article's name) or WP:C2C (consistency with established category tree names). Please see instructions below.
- Determine which speedy criterion applies
- Tag category page with
{{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}}or{{subst:cfm-speedy|Merge target}} - List request along with speedy criteria reason under "Current requests" below on this page
Please note that a speedy request must state which of the narrowly defined criteria strictly applies. Hence, any other non-speedy criteria, even "common sense" or "obvious", may be suitable points, but only at a full discussion at WP:Categories for discussion.
Requests may take 48 hours to process after listing if there are no objections. This delay allows other users to review the request to ensure that it meets the speedy criteria for speedy renaming or merging, and to raise objections to the proposed change.
Categories that qualify for speedy deletion (per Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, e.g., "patent nonsense", "recreation") can be tagged with the regular speedy tags, such as {{db|reason}} with no required delay. Empty categories can be deleted if they remain empty 7 days after tagging with {{db-empty}}. Renaming under C2E may also be processed instantly (at the discretion of an administrator) as it is a variation on G7.
To oppose a speedy request you must record your objection within 48 hours of the nomination. Do this by inserting immediately under the nomination:
- Oppose, (the reasons for your objection). ~~~~
You will not be able to do this by editing the page WP:Categories for discussion. Instead, you should edit the section WP:Categories for discussion#Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here or the page WP:Categories for discussion/Speedy#Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here (WP:CFDS). Be aware that in the course of any discussion, the nomination and its discussion may get moved further down the page purely for organizational convenience – you may need to search WP:CFDS to find the new location. Participate in any ongoing discussion, but unless you withdraw your opposition, a knowledgeable person may eventually bring forward the nomination and discussion to become a regular CFD discussion. At that stage you may add further comments, but your initial opposition will still be considered. However, if after seven days there has been no support for the request, and no response from the nominator, the request may be dropped from further consideration as a speedy.
Contested speedy requests become stale, and can be untagged and delisted after 7 days of inactivity. Optionally, if the discussion may be useful for future reference, it may be copied to the category talk page, with a section heading and {{moved discussion from|[[WP:CFDS]]|2=~~~~}}. If the nominator wants to revive the process, this may be requested at WP:Categories for discussion (CfD) in accordance with its instructions.
If you belatedly notice and want to oppose a speedy move that has already been processed, contact one of the admins who process the Speedy page. If your objection seems valid, they may reverse the move, or start a full CFD discussion.
Speedy criteria
[edit]The category-specific criteria for speedy renaming, or merging are strictly limited to:
C2A: Typographic and spelling fixes
[edit]- Correction of spelling errors and capitalization fixes. Differences between British and American spelling (e.g. Harbours → Harbors) are not considered errors; however if the convention of the relevant category tree is to use one form over the other then a rename may be appropriate under C2C. If both spellings exist as otherwise-identical category names, they should be merged.
- Appropriate conversion of hyphens into en dashes or vice versa (e.g. Category:Canada-Russia relations → Category:Canada–Russia relations).
- Correction of obvious grammatical errors, such as a missing conjunction (e.g. Individual frogs toads → Individual frogs and toads). This includes pluralizing a noun in the name of a set category, but not when disagreement might reasonably be anticipated as to whether the category is a topic or set category.
C2B: Consistency with established Wikipedia naming conventions and practices
[edit]- Expanding abbreviated country names (e.g. U.S. → United States).
- Disambiguation fixes from an unqualified name (e.g. Category:Washington → Category:Washington (state) or Category:Washington, D.C.).
C2C: Consistency with established category tree names
[edit]Bringing a category into line with established naming conventions for that category tree, or into line with the various "x by y", "x of y", or "x in y" categorization conventions specified at Wikipedia:Category names
- This should be used only where there is no room for doubt that the category in question is being used for the standard purpose instead of being a potential subcategory.
- This criterion should be applied only when there is no ambiguity or doubt over the existence of a category naming convention. Such a convention must be well defined and must be overwhelmingly used within the tree. If this is not the case then the category in question must be brought forward to a full Cfd nomination.
- This criterion will not apply in cases where the category tree observes distinctions in local usage (e.g. Category:Transportation in the United States and Category:Transport in the United Kingdom).
C2D: Consistency with main article's name
[edit]- Renaming a topic category to match its eponymous page (e.g. Category:The Beatles and The Beatles).
- This applies only if the related page's current name (and by extension, the proposed name for the category) is:
- unambiguous (so it generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator); and
- uncontroversial, either because of longstanding stability at that particular name, or because the page was just moved (i) after a page move discussion resulted in explicit consensus to rename, or (ii) unilaterally to reflect an official renaming which is verified by one or more citations (provided in the nomination). C2D does not apply if the result would be contrary to guidelines at WP:CATNAME, or there is any ongoing discussion about the name of the page or category, or there has been a recent discussion concerning any of the pages that resulted in a no consensus result, or it is controversial in some other way.
- This criterion may also be used to rename a set category in the same circumstances, where the set is defined by a renamed topic; e.g. players for a sports team, or places in a district.
- Before nominating a category to be renamed per WP:C2D, consider whether it makes more sense to move the article instead of the category.
C2E: Author request
[edit]- This criterion applies only if the author of a category requests or agrees to renaming within six months of creating the category.
- The criterion does not apply if other editors have populated or changed the category since it was created. "Other editors" includes bots that populated the category, but excludes an editor working with the author on the renaming.
C2F: One eponymous page
[edit]- This criterion applies if the category contains only an eponymous article, list, template or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories, where applicable. Nominations should use
{{subst:cfm-speedy}}(speedy merger) linking to a suitable parent category, or to another appropriate category (e.g. one that is currently on the article). When listing the nomination at WP:CFDS, you must manually add all the appropriate parent categories as targets if the member page is not already in them.
Admin instructions
[edit]When handling the listings:
- Make sure that the listing meets one of the above criteria.
- With the exception of C2E, make sure that it was both listed and tagged at least 48 hours previously.
- Make sure that there is no opposition to the listing; if there is a discussion, check if the opposing user(s) ended up withdrawing their opposition.
If the listing meets these criteria, simply have the category renamed or merged – follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Administrator instructions, in the section "If the decision is to Rename, Merge, or Delete"; to list it for the bots, use the Speedy moves section.
Applying speedy criteria in full discussions
[edit]- A nomination to merge or rename, brought forward as a full CfD, may be speedily closed if the closing administrator is satisfied that:
- The nomination clearly falls within the scope of one of the criteria listed here, and
- No objections have been made within 48 hours of the initial nomination.
- If both these conditions are satisfied, the closure will be regarded as having been a result of a speedy nomination. If any objections have been raised then the CfD nomination will remain in place for the usual 7-day discussion period, to be decided in accordance with expressed consensus.
Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here
[edit]If the category and desired change do not match one of the criteria mentioned in C2, do not list it here. Instead, list it in the main CFD section.
If you are in any doubt as to whether it qualifies, do not list it here.
Use the following format on a new line at the beginning of the list:
* [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~
If the current name should be redirected rather than deleted, use:
* REDIRECT [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~
To note that human action is required, e.g. updating a template that populates the category, use:
* NO BOTS [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~
Remember to tag the category page with: {{subst:cfr-speedy|New name}}
A request may be completed if it is more than 48 hours old; that is, if the time stamp shown is earlier than 02:22, 15 May 2025 (UTC). Currently, there are 48 open requests ().
 | Administrators and page movers: Do not use the "Move" tab to move categories listed here!Categories are processed following the 48-hour waiting period and are moved by a bot. |
Current requests
[edit]Please add new requests at the top of the list, preferably with a link to the parent category (in case of C2C) or relevant article (in case of C2D).
- Category:Ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople to Category:Ecumenical patriarchs of Constantinople – C2D with main list article: List of ecumenical patriarchs of Constantinople. Woko Sapien (talk) 18:39, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople by century to Category:Ecumenical patriarchs of Constantinople by century
- Category:16th-century Ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople to Category:16th-century ecumenical patriarchs of Constantinople
- Category:17th-century Ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople to Category:17th-century ecumenical patriarchs of Constantinople
- Category:18th-century Ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople to Category:18th-century ecumenical patriarchs of Constantinople
- Category:19th-century Ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople to Category:19th-century ecumenical patriarchs of Constantinople
- Category:20th-century Ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople to Category:20th-century ecumenical patriarchs of Constantinople
- Category:21st-century Ecumenical Patriarchs of Constantinople to Category:21st-century ecumenical patriarchs of Constantinople
- Category:Mayors and Lord Mayors of Wollongong to Category:Mayors and lord mayors of Wollongong – C2D, per List of mayors and lord mayors of Wollongong. Woko Sapien (talk) 14:40, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Mayors and Lord Mayors of Darwin to Category:Mayors and lord mayors of Darwin – C2D, per List of mayors and lord mayors of Darwin. Woko Sapien (talk) 14:30, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Mayors and Lord Mayors of Newcastle to Category:Mayors and lord mayors of Newcastle – C2D, per List of mayors and lord mayors of Newcastle. Woko Sapien (talk) 14:21, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Subdivisions of Stockholm to Category:Administrative divisions of Stockholm – C2C: Category:Administrative divisions of Sweden Kaffet i halsen (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Lio albums to Category:Lio (singer) albums – C2D: per Lio (singer). 1857a (talk) 03:48, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Saint Peter's Basilica to Category:St. Peter's Basilica – C2D, per St. Peter's Basilica; the RM which initially moved the article to the "Saint" spelling was reopened, and has now closed in favour of "St.". Ham II (talk) 18:54, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Medalists at at the 2023 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival to Category:Medalists at the 2023 European Youth Summer Olympic Festival – C2A - remove duplicate "at" - Arjayay (talk) 16:39, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Investment Ministers to Category:Investment ministers – C2C with parent category Category:Government ministers by portfolio and all subcategories Category:Investment ministers of Jordan etc. Woko Sapien (talk) 16:08, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Young Offender Institutions to Category:Young offender institutions – C2A, C2B, C2C: As with all the other prisoner security categories in the United Kingdom (including the other ones for minors, secure training centre and secure children's home), this phrase is not a proper name. (It is capitalised as part of one in the names of specific facilities, e.g. Wetherby Young Offender Institution, and in the name of the formal government programme administering them, His Majesty's Young Offender Institutions). The main article is presently at His Majesty's Young Offender Institution, which may not be desirable, since these facilities are ususally referred to by the shorter term young offender institution; but that presently redirects to youth detention center and perhaps it should not, since the YOI term is disused in the US, and the YDC article is US-focused; it might be better for the YOI term and its variants to go the UK article and for it to be renamed Young offender institution, with a hatnote for the rare US (or other) usage. Regardless, the CFDSPEEDY question is clear enough. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 13:40, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:DHX Media films to Category:WildBrain films – C2D: Per WildBrain VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 13:10, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have only tagged the category now. Ymblanter (talk) 22:14, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Bullet heaven video games to Category:Vampire Survivors-likes – C2D: Rename to match main article name. If the creator thinks it should be changed, they should request an RM of the main article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:00, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree, we should not label a genre after an entire game, firstly because Vampire Survivors wasn't even the first game to feature such gameplay, the first game in the genre was Magic Survival, which the creator of VS literally stated that VS was inspired by MS. It's kinda similar to the whole "Doom-clones" thing. Reaper The God Of Games (talk) 08:18, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:NA-Class Years articles of Low-importance to Category:NA-Class Years pages of Low-importance – C2C: Per Category:NA-Class pages. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 21:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Music of County Mayo to Category:Music in County Mayo – C2C: To match other entries in Category:Music of Ireland CeltBrowne (talk) 05:04, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- I have only tagged the category now. Ymblanter (talk) 01:12, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:California University of Pennsylvania alumni to Category:Pennsylvania Western University, California alumni – C2D: article is Pennsylvania Western University, California Joeykai (talk) 12:37, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- Should this be Category:Pennsylvania Western University, California, alumni, per MOS:GEOCOMMA? Ham II (talk) 12:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Joeykai: please comment. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:11, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Ham II:@Marcocapelle: No, it should be Category:Pennsylvania Western University, California alumni. MOS:GEOCOMMA wouldn't apply here; University of California, Irvine is the example used in GEOCOMMA, please see that school's alumni category as an example Category:University of California, Irvine alumni Joeykai (talk) 01:00, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Ham II: are you okay with nom's explanation? Marcocapelle (talk) 23:57, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Marcocapelle: OK, fair enough if the example in MOS:GEOCOMMA has eponymous categories which don't follow MOS:GEOCOMMA. I won't obstruct this move, but categories like this should be reconsidered en masse with a full CfD discussion at another time. Ham II (talk) 15:48, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Ham II: are you okay with nom's explanation? Marcocapelle (talk) 23:57, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Should this be Category:Pennsylvania Western University, California, alumni, per MOS:GEOCOMMA? Ham II (talk) 12:43, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Opposed requests
[edit]- Category:Bosnian Muslim Ustaše to Category:Bosnian Muslim Ustaše members. The Current name is too broad, and the intent for creating the category is to list Bosnian Muslim Ustaše members. --Governor Sheng (talk) 20:53, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Governor Sheng: this is not speediable, it should be listed for full discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Kerala awards to Category:Kerala Awards – C2D. Gjs238 (talk) 20:01, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose the category currently contains not just the Kerala Awards, but also various other awards awarded in/by Kerala, it appears. Additionally, I don't think Kerala Awards should be capitalized in the first place, but moved to Kerala awards. See[1]. Jahaza (talk) 15:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
On hold pending other discussion
[edit]- Category:Dramatiska Institutet alumni to Category:Swedish Institute of Dramatic Art alumni – C2D: Swedish Institute of Dramatic Art Kaffet i halsen (talk) 07:53, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Kaffet i halsen:, I think Dramatiska Institutet is probably the common name, see Talk:Swedish Institute of Dramatic Art#Article name. TSventon (talk) 10:21, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Let's hold this the article name is decided. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 06:33, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Kaffet i halsen:, I think Dramatiska Institutet is probably the common name, see Talk:Swedish Institute of Dramatic Art#Article name. TSventon (talk) 10:21, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Songs by KAJ to Category:KAJ songs – C2C. See Category:Songs by artist. 78.82.201.71 (talk) 20:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
- This may be eligible for speedy per C2C, but since there is a current RM for the article, there's a good chance this should end up being Category:KAJ (group) songs. So I oppose per C2D as there is "ongoing discussion about the name of the page". Best to wait out the discussion. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Moved to full discussion
[edit]- Category:Dynasties of Medieval Andhradesa to Category:Minor Dynasties of Medieval Andhradesa – C2E These were minor dynasties, so it is more apt to mention Minor Sharkslayer87 (talk) 09:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: would it make more sense as Category:Minor dynasties of medieval Andhradesa? That way it fully conforms to WP:SENTENCECASE. Woko Sapien (talk) 14:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- I have only tagged the category now. Note also that it does not have subcategories (and generally anything except for the CfD template) Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Sharkslayer87: support "medieval" per C2A, and per Woko Sapien. That can be processed for a start. Other than that it should go to full discussion, it is questionable if "minor" adds anything and the name "Andhradesa" is also not too obvious. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:27, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Marcocapelle: The idea is to only include small medieval dynasties from andhra region in this category and not include big ones. Andhradesa can be changed to Andhra. @Woko Sapien: I agree with you. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 11:07, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Moved to full discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:06, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Sharkslayer87: support "medieval" per C2A, and per Woko Sapien. That can be processed for a start. Other than that it should go to full discussion, it is questionable if "minor" adds anything and the name "Andhradesa" is also not too obvious. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:27, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Places in mythology to Category:Locations in mythology – C2C: the subcategories are all called "locations". Marcocapelle (talk) 06:03, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose the parents though are called "Places" and in fact so is one of the subcategories and some of the grandchild categories under Hindu mythology. Jahaza (talk) 18:40, 29 April 2025 (UTC)
- Category:Telenovelas about spiritism to Category:Telenovelas about Spiritism – C2C within Category:Spiritism – Fayenatic London 09:16, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Category:Spiritism is only capitalized because it's the beginning of the category name. The name "spiritism" itself is not proper. See the name of the article Kardecist spiritism for example. Jahaza (talk) 16:13, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Fayenatic london and Jahaza: shouldn't it become Category:Kardecist spiritism as a matter of C2D? Marcocapelle (talk) 20:51, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Since this is opposed, a full discussion is needed along with Category:Spiritism and Category:Films about Spiritism. – Fayenatic London 21:43, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Now at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2025_May_8#Category:Spiritism. – Fayenatic London 13:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Fayenatic london and Jahaza: shouldn't it become Category:Kardecist spiritism as a matter of C2D? Marcocapelle (talk) 20:51, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Category:Spiritism is only capitalized because it's the beginning of the category name. The name "spiritism" itself is not proper. See the name of the article Kardecist spiritism for example. Jahaza (talk) 16:13, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
Ready for deletion
[edit]Check Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion for out of process deletions. In some cases, these will need to be nominated for discussion and the editor who emptied the category informed that they should follow the WP:CFD process.
Once the renaming has been completed, copy and paste the listing to the Ready for deletion section of Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working/Manual.
Empty categories awaiting deletion
[edit]The categories listed below have been identified as empty using {{db-catempty}}, and will be speedily deleted after 7 days unless populated. (Note: Due to technical limitations, all contents of the category may not be displayed; view the category directly to see all contents.)