Jump to content

Template:Admin dashboard

Permanently protected template
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 83
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 151
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 74
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 9
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 220
Requested RD1 redactions 7
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 2
Candidates for speedy deletion 56
Open sockpuppet investigations 42
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Copy to Wikimedia Commons with hidden file revisions
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Template:Admin dashboard
Template:Admin dashboard/light
Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox
Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported


User-reported

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 2
Hoaxes 1
Vandalism 0
User requested 12
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 17
Importance or significance not asserted 2
Possibly contested candidates 4
Other candidates 26
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 4 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 118 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 25 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 7 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Talk:Tornado outbreak sequence of May 15–16, 2025

Reason: Sockpuppetry; see also Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Andrew5. Departure– (talk) 16:23, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Will leave open for another to review, but I don't see enough explanation as to why this is a sock in the report, at least not without doing significant comparison digging, which wasn't done in the sock report. The bar is higher for a talk page than an article, so I wouldn't be inclined to protect at this stage. Again, waiting for another opinion. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:03, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Sabu (wrestler)

Temporary full protection: Despite a recent 24 hour full protection, both IP and established editors continue to edit war over birth and death dates. Now they're also warring over whether his real name is Terrence or Terry. At least one established editor has broken WP:3RR after being warned. Discussion is happening on talk page but the edit warring on the article continues regardless. NJZombie (talk) 22:12, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Cuauhtémoc Brooklyn Bridge collision

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. Unexplained and unsourced vandalism by an IP claiming that the Brooklyn Bridge's clearance is less than 40 ft. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 05:35, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:07, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Adal (historical region)

Reason: Revolving IP has been editwarring and removing content on multiple pages after repeated warnings. Admin at SPI recommended page protection is easier to handle this [1] Magherbin (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

admin not say i was they say IF I was, but is not true. they accuse me of puppet as well is not true too. He keep adding OR look me edits please

he try before lock but fail

Aberfan disaster

Reason: There's been some edit warring on this FA by an IP and a brand new account - 'both' deny being connected to one another, but it's amazing that two new editors both land on this page and are both pressing for the same small and obscure fact to be added to the page. - SchroCat (talk) 10:07, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:11, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Ahmednagar

Reason: Two logged-out editors have been name-warring on this article since 10 April.

Since 20 April 2025, a logged-out editor has been edit-warring to change the names in the article from Ahmednagar to Ahilyanagar.

Another logged-out editor has been inappropriately changing Ahilyanagar to Ahmednagar since 10 April.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:19, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

2025 Albanian parliamentary election

Reason: Make the page semi-protected as unregistered accounts usually make a mess. JustAnAlbo (talk) 14:33, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Dr vulpes (Talk) 08:00, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

2025–26 Real Madrid CF season

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again, editors adding a new coach which has not been announced. Kante4 (talk) 16:02, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

List of MediaTek systems on chips

Reason: Disruptive edits by sock dynamic IP user, where he was disruptively editing the related List of Qualcomm Snapdragon systems on chips as well. Alawadhi3000 (talk) 16:22, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Dragon Age: The Veilguard

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war still going on... Sariel Xilo (talk) 18:09, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Callanecc. Favonian (talk) 09:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Production of Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption from IP editor has continued after prior protection lapsed. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:47, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Disney Star

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Requesting as likely WP:PROMO sockpuppetry and edit warring has persisted with no clear signs of ceasing. Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:56, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Crusade of 1197

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 19:10, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Max Branning

Reason: Vandalism. The Media are speculating that the character is returning to the soap, yet the BBC has not confirmed this. Until they do confirm it, the article should not say that the character is returning. MrLewisAshdown (talk) 19:40, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Eurovision Song Contest 2026

Reason: Disruptive editing and back and forth on reverts 46.49.71.37 (talk) 20:11, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandal account tried blanking the page multiple RaschenTechner (talk) 20:19, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

times RaschenTechner (talk) 20:19, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Cyriac Abby Philips

Reason: High level of vandalism EQTN (talk) 20:27, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Touhou Project

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by dynamic IP. Loafiewa (talk) 21:46, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Blaze and the Monster Machines

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. I’ve been trying to rapidly revert these edits related to Bob the Builder, but they keep happening over and over. 2603:8001:8043:2B22:8568:543C:1211:3422 (talk) 23:59, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Therapy First

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts to remove valid information by anonymous user(s). Seems to be an IP hopping vandal. Has been quite persistent but with gaps in-between attempts so I suggest at least a few weeks protection. DanielRigal (talk) 00:05, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Sabra (character)

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Isi96 (talk) 00:05, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Ela Velden

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent change of birth year to random years by IP users, specifically from Vietnam. Blocking is not helping as a new address continues the vandalism. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 01:29, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:43, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:00, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 08:11, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Muhammad Pasha of Rawanduz

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Agha Peace Beg (talk) 01:45, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:38, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

PolySeSouvient

Reason: This page on a canadian firearm regulation organisation is often subject to modifications that appear biased by personnal or political opinions. Gazouilli123 (talk) 02:05, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Stacey Slater

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Immediate resume of editing patterns within five-hours of protection lifting. livelikemusic (TALK!) 02:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Austria in the Eurovision Song Contest

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – protect pre-emptively whilst linked on main page; already received some vandalism. Happily888 (talk) 06:30, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Wasted Love (JJ song)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – protect pre-emptively whilst linked on main page; already received some vandalism. Happily888 (talk) 06:30, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Chainsaw Man

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Xexerss (talk) 07:15, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 08:39, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Dandadan

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Xexerss (talk) 07:16, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Kagurabachi

Reason: Persistent vandalism Xexerss (talk) 07:24, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Bhale Bhale Magadivoy

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BOVINEBOY2008 08:19, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edits almost a week ago. Lectonar (talk) 09:03, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Ian Fang

Reason: High level of vandalism. Pscmaczilhca (talk) 08:29, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

The One That Got Away (Philippine TV series)

Reason: Asking for a permanent article protection, for the fact that this article has been vandalized dozen of times, possibly from the same person who is behind several vandal-only accounts. Hotwiki (talk) 09:16, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

List of Indian films of 2025

Reason: Due to a high level of persistent vandalism and ongoing edit warring on this page—largely driven by repeated fan wars—I am requesting extended confirmed protection for this article until the end of the year. The disruption has been frequent and sustained, and regular semi-protection has proven insufficient in curbing the issue. Extended confirmed protection would help maintain the integrity and stability of the page. Tonyy Starkk (talk) 09:31, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Xiaomi HyperOS

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User:146.19.59.52 keeps ignoring warnings, and continuously vandalizes this page. CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 09:47, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Nigga in Paris

Add "#REDIRECT Niggas in Paris"

  • From an incorrect name: This is a redirect from an incorrect name that serves readers as a good search term. The correct name is given by the target of the redirect.
    • Pages that use this link should be updated to link directly to the target without the use of a piped link that hides the correct details.
Easternsahara (talk) 16:25, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
As a note, this will require an administrator as the title is blacklisted. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:18, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Is there any evidence this song is referred to in the singular? * Pppery * it has begun... 21:16, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Anontools (request) 2025-05-01 12:08 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Kanye West (request) 2025-05-17 11:34 Fully protected, expires 2025-05-25 at 14:16:02 UTC (log) Modified by Johnuniq on 2025-05-11: "Edit warring / content dispute: protection was indefinite ECP"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:04, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
10 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 02:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2015-02-17: "Highly visible template: More than 7500 transclusions"
Template:Merged-from (request) 2025-04-02 03:42 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:Copied (request) 2025-04-02 03:43 Template-protected (log) Protected by Newslinger on 2020-06-14: "Highly visible template"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2025-04-02 23:47 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request) 2025-05-01 20:01 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox comics creator (request) 2025-05-08 21:37 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox gymnast (request) 2025-05-11 15:37 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Module:Location map (request) 2025-05-13 18:06 Template-protected (log) Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-03-11: "High-risk Lua module: requested at RfPP"
Module:College color (request) 2025-05-14 23:43 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
Module:Political party (request) 2025-05-15 04:02 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2021-11-18: "High-risk template or module: 13487 transclusions (more info)"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:49, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Kjansen86

I am autopatrolled and an NPP reviewer; I would actually like to nominate User:Kjansen86 to be autopatrolled. I just reviewed and cheerfully accepted almost a dozen perfectly-formulated articles on Zoroastrian texts, and they have made more than 25 overall. Looking at their talk page, this appears to be an experienced and effective editor. Checking their AfD stats, I find one (successful) AfD that they initiated, indicating an awareness of notability. We may as well take them out of the NPP backlog. (This is my first time nominating someone else so if I did it wrong, please let me know!) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 21:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Already done (automated response): This user already has the "autoreviewer" user right. — MusikBot talk 21:20, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@LEvalyn: I went ahead and adjusted the nomination so it reflects who's actually being discussed, hope you don't mind! For future reference, you can use the "add request" link at the top of this page and replace the {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} with whichever user you're nominating. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:42, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, I really appreciate your fix for this nomination and your tip for next time! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 23:01, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
@LEvalyn: Thank you very much for the positive evaluation of my work on Wikipedia. I really appreciate it. Kjansen86 (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

User:Hteiktinhein

Hello, I have created over 30 articles, none of which have been deleted. I am well-versed in Wikipedia's notability guidelines and currently assist new Burmese editors. I focus on creating articles related to Myanmar that need to be written, including those covering current events. Granting me autopatrolled rights would help reduce the backlog of articles awaiting review. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Hteiktinhein (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) At the pace this editor is creating, I would expect granting the flag to help reduce the backlog. These are solid articles; talk pages are created, which helps as well. I am AGF'ing on the Burmese language sources but have no concerns. @Hteiktinhein, a couple nits: on Padein Prince rebellion, the section of "Members" with an unexplained bulleted list is a bit confusing, and on Thetpan Mibaya, the "see also" section should go above the references section per MOS:LAYOUT. But these are just small things to keep in mind for the future. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
@Dclemens1971 Thank you very much for your kind comment on my contributions. I plan to continue creating more content related to Burmese history, especially topics that are still missing from the English Wikipedia.
Although access to Wikipedia has been banned in Myanmar across all language versions, I am able to contribute using the ipblock-exempt right.
Please don't worry about the Burmese-language sources — I have substantial knowledge of Burmese history, particularly the Konbaung era, and I have access to both online and offline versions of the Konbaung Chronicle and other historical texts. I appreciate your helpful notes regarding some minor issues in my articles, such as the structuring of See also sections and now fixed, and I'll certainly keep them in mind going forward. Best regards. Hteiktinhein (talk) 16:50, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, may I ask what the issue is? There doesn’t seem to be any problem on my side, and all the other users who applied at the same time have already been granted the rights. Why am I the only one delayed? Hteiktinhein (talk) 03:04, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

User:MerlinVtwelve

Hallo! I've created 46 articles, and have been editing Wikipedia since 2010. How time flies! merlinVtwelve (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Reviewed the last several articles, and while your grasp of notability is strong, I did find an instance of WP:CLOP on your most recent creation that is very close to the line of copyvio if not over it. See Copyvio Detector results. This article is otherwise very well done! Two other things to consider when creating articles: create talk pages (the WP:RATER tool is helpful here) and make sure at least one other page links to yours. If you were to be autopatrolled, orphaned pages would likely stay orphaned longer. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Dclemens1971thanks for the review!. I'll revisit those sections and re-word them. Will keep an eye on WP:CLOP and linked pages in future. Will check out WP:RATER also. Cheers, merlinVtwelve (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Phantomdj

Hi, I have created 118 pages and would like to have autopatrol rights, please. Thanks. Phantomdj (talk) 01:46, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I reviewed @Phantomdj's last 10 article creations, and they are overall quite good. Well-formatted, clean copy. They all appear to be compliant with WP:NASTRO. It would be helpful if they could create talk pages for their creations (the WP:RATER tool is helpful for this) but otherwise I think the project would benefit from Phantomdj being autopatrolled. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:56, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:VortexPhantom

Requesting the AWB to perform repetitive tasks. I will mainly use it for adding categories to AFd debates, fixing grammatical error, fixing abuse of tags. Thanks for considering my request. VortexPhantom🔥 (talk) 07:33, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Warriorglance

I would like to do repitative tasks such as adding wikilinks, fixing typos, etc Warriorglance(talk to me) 06:32, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Fade258

Hi. I intend to use AWB to assist with repetitive but useful maintenance tasks such as fixing common formatting issues, updating templates, correcting typos, and performing category cleanups. Similarly, I have also reviewed the guidelines and will ensure all edits follow Wikipedia policies. I am also familiar with Wikipedia editing conventions and have made constructive edits. Thank you for considering my request and I hope for positive response. Fade258 (talk) 13:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

You've requested three different permissions in a week. That looks a lot like WP:Hat collecting. Do you really expect to use all of these? * Pppery * it has begun... 21:45, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Pppery, Well, You're right to ask. I understand concerns about hat collecting. I had requested these permissions because I have specific or immediate plans to use each permission that I have in more frequently, policy based and in constructive manner. If you'd like, I can explain how I intend to apply each permission in current areas where I'm active. I'm not interested in collecting rights for my own sake only as I intend to help where there's a clear need. Thank You for reviewing my request. Fade258 (talk) 13:03, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Valorrr

I wish to become an AutoWikiBrowser user to fix Linter, errors along with many other things that can I assist with, I understand that I may have had problems with admins and acted a bit outrageous, but I understand my actions and now been using Twinke, Ultraviolet, Rater and more, I believe I can be trusted with AutoWikiBrowser rights, as I've waited my time, and today/yesterday is my 2 month anniversary of my account. Feel free to ask me any questions.

I also understand that I should be checking every edit before saving it and the other guidelines...
Valorrr (lets chat) 22:13, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for autowikibrowser declined in the past 90 days ([15][16]). — MusikBot talk 22:20, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
 Not done per Special:Diff/1290775826. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:18, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:2010isGenZ

I'm a trusty person and a reformed vandal, sorry for that 2010isGenZ (talk) 04:37, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. Your account will become automatically confirmed once it has made 10 edits. Currently, you have made 7 edits. Mz7 (talk) 08:14, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag.

Extended confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for event coordinator

Event coordinator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Octavosaurus

Hi! I'm running a Wikipedia training session in central London next Thursday (22/05/2025) with 20 people booked on. Could I be granted Event Coordinator Rights for this to avoid the IP block please? Octavosaurus (talk) 14:05, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

 Done for 10 days. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:09, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission event coordinator. — MusikBot talk 18:10, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
@Pppery: (Non-administrator comment) You mistakenly set their existing extended-confirmed permission to expire in 10 days instead of granting event-coordinator for 10 days. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 18:48, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Whoops, now fixed. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:49, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the mass message sender flag.

Mass message sender

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Scaledish

I'm requesting preliminary new page reviewer to help with the backlog drive. Preliminary because I'm not perfect—I've definitely fallen victim to WP:AKON before with my own creations[1], but I also have created a number of articles that stuck, and edited up articles quite a bit[2]. Importantly each process I've learned and grown. I plan to start small and grow over time as I become more and more confident with the process. Just recently attempted to review a draft with obvious advertising and realized the permissions would be good. Thanks,

References

  1. ^ see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowdfense
  2. ^ recently Haight Ashbury Free Clinic
Scaledish! Talkish? Statish. 03:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply signed, Rosguill talk 18:40, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

User:JesusisGreat7

I’d like to request the New Page Reviewer right. I meet the criteria and have experience with article creation and deletion processes. Previously, I had a request declined as I applied for several rights at once—I understand this was seen as hat collecting. This time, my intent is focused: I’d like to help with the backlog and review pages containing promotional or disruptive content. Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 18:08, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([17]). — MusikBot talk 18:10, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
JesusisGreat7, I noticed that as part of your userboxes you include User:LeapofAzzam/Userboxes/ChatGPT. Could you speak briefly to the extent you have or haven't used ChatGPT on Wikipedia? signed, Rosguill talk 15:22, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Hey @Rosguill, it’s true that I listed the userbox while just scrolling to find userboxes, especially on the sites I use or visit often, basically to indicate the sites I’ve used or use regularly, mainly for research! I know AI tends to add emotive and promotional tones when writing articles, which goes against the guidelines! Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 15:29, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response. I'm honestly on the fence overall about conferring a trial run at this time and will leave this for another admin to give a further opinion. signed, Rosguill talk 15:39, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
@Rosguill Thanks! Jesus isGreat7 ☾⋆ | Ping Me 15:43, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

User:WeWake

I'm requesting permissions to become a new page reviewer. I acknowledge that I have reviewed the requirements and responsibilities of these user rights. I bring experience creating new pages (>30+ recent articles) in WP mainspace aligned with core content policies and their understanding, 3000+ total edits, good faith interactions with other users, former experience as AfC, and awarness and tooling (Twinkle) to handle page curation processes. In interest of transparency, I also have a AfC request open at the moment and hadn't realized that NPP now includes AfC rights. If this is granted, I will withdraw that request. Thanks!— WeWake (talk) 03:55, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia and your interest in this permission. Unfortunately, upon reviewing your edit history, I'm concerned that you are creating AI-assisted articles without sufficiently taking time to review their citations. I also see various indications on your user talk page that other editors have taken issue with you rushing through processes. I'm also concerned by relatively recent !votes at AfD under your old user name such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giri Balasubramanium.  Not done signed, Rosguill talk 15:36, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Rosguill, appreciate time to review! Hopefully you'll allow me to address your concerns before making a final decision. Re: concerns around AI-assistance. The AI-assistance for articles are approrpriate tagged and thoroughly reviewed and heavily edited where applicable. For example, I use to create Infobox templates (using manually verified information) or formatting text into lists such as bibliography or adding markup. There were no concerns around citations or verifiability raised by anyone (as you've indicated) — except the one talk page discussion was centered on MoS, which was fair and I resolved it through good-faith discussion. So if I have missed anything, do please let me know. In fact, several editors and reviews have in fact acknowledge my contributions 1, 2. The talk page should also highlight my good-faith discussions with other editors where issues raised, if any, were duly resolved. Finally, re: Giri Balasubramanium page, I understand that my vote and reasoning was not aligned with the outcome, but AfD afterall is a discussion and consensus driven forum, so I feel my vote on that matter doesn't particularly reflect a lack of understanding on the process. It's a work in progress and, after all, people vote differently on AfDs (than the final outcome) all the time. Thanks! — WeWake (talk) 16:35, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
My concern is that there is a general pattern of excessive haste exhibited in the last month alone, and that this is not a good fit for new page reviewing. Further, my concern regarding the Balasubramanium AfD is not that you were in the minority, but that you were arguing for TEDx talks and interviews as notability-establishing sources, which indicates a significant gap concerning your knowledge of the guidelines relevant to new page reviewing. Consider reapplying in the future when you have a track record demonstrating that these issues are firmly in the past. signed, Rosguill talk 16:54, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Rosguill, alright, thanks for the specific feedback! — WeWake (talk) 17:31, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Iljhgtn

There are some categories that might warrant moving that I cannot currently without this permission. For tangentially related details, I have a 98.9% AfD match rate, have made 63,500+ edits, and have been editing for a couple years now and am familiar with the page move policy and guidelines. Iljhgtn (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

@Iljhgtn even though the permission gives you the technical ability to move categories, category moves should still go through WP:CFD/WP:CFDS. Do you have uses for the permission other than moving categories? Elli (talk | contribs) 02:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Sure, for helping draftify of new articles etc. Iljhgtn (talk) 03:24, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
The scripts: User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft and User:Mr. Stradivarius/gadgets/Draftify both look like they would be particularly useful. Iljhgtn (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Garsh2

Good day,

When reviewing pages, I frequently encounter situations such that this permission would be useful or necessary. These include redirect suppression when draftifying to reduce the number of R2s needed and the ability to move pages over single-revision redirects when accepting AFC drafts, which can occasionally present a barrier. I would also like to help with uncontroversial category and technical moves. I meet the WP:PMCRITERIA and believe I have a demonstrated both a need for the permissions and an understanding of the associated guidelines. Garsh (talk) 17:55, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

User:TheDoctorWho

I've found myself making semi-regular requests at WP:RM/TR (7 in the last two years, 13 overall). I feel like this is one of the things I could just handle myself instead of bothering others with, and could potentially help out with as I see fit. I don't currently plan on closing any RM discussions, but I am very familiar with WP:NCTV, which is my main topic area, that I rarely branch out out of, and the general policy laid out at WP:NC. TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:51, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Opm581

I would like to have the pending changes reviewer right so that I can help fight vandalism and deal with pending changes backlogs. I revert vandalism and other inappropriate edits when I come across them when I'm recent changes patrolling or viewing my watchlist. I also believe that I meet the WP:PCCRITERIA. Thanks for considering my request. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 23:45, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

User:HirowoWiki

Hello! I am requesting pending changes reviewer rights. When reviewing changes, it should be well-known constructive edits or inappropriate edits wherever should be accepted or declined. Rollback rights has also been granted. –HirowoWiki (📝) 10:17, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Skratata69

Reason for requesting rollback rights. Have undone multiple vandalism attempts on K. Chandrashekar Rao and Revanth Reddy. Having the rollback permission will be helpful to quickly revert multiple edits. Skratata69 (talk) 17:17, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Chippla360

Hello, I will love to request for the rollback permission so I can help fight against vandalism and revert unconstructive edits, I’m also interested to use the wp:ANVDL tool to detect vandalism more easily. I believe meet the requirements and I took the feedbacks after my last request was declined over the last 1 month, I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes since then and I’m here again. Chippla ✍️ - Best Regards 06:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([18]). — MusikBot talk 06:50, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

User:ArachnidInner

Hey there :3

I'm looking for rollback perms so I can speed up my vandal reversion by using tools such as huggle. I don't have any issues with RedWarn but my more experienced friends tell me that huggle is much nicer and faster to use. (Arachnid's userpage | what did I do now) 00:05, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

User:KnowDeath

Rollback would make it easier for me to revert vandalism. KnowDeath (talk) 02:44, 19 May 2025 (UTC) KnowDeath (talk) 02:44, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Admin_dashboard&oldid=1288264832"