Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.

  • If this is your first article and you want your draft article moved to the mainspace, please submit it for review at Articles for creation, by adding the code {{subst:submit}} to the top of the draft or user sandbox page instead of listing it here.
  • Because you are autoconfirmed, you can move most pages yourself. Do not request technical assistance on this page if you can do it yourself.
  • If you need help determining whether it's okay to move the page to a different title, then please follow the instructions at the top of Wikipedia:Requested moves.
  • Please make sure you really need technical assistance before making a request here. In particular, if the target page is a redirect back to the source page that has only one revision, you can usually move the page normally.
  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason: 
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Add a new request
Remove all requests

Technical requests

[edit]
Edit this section if you want to move a request between sections.

Uncontroversial technical requests

[edit]
Most requests should be placed below this heading.

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

[edit]
If your request involves reverting a recent move, place it here.

Contested technical requests

[edit]
Do not insert new requests in this section. Only move requests here if the requested move has been contested.
@V.B.Speranza That sounds like a good argument for an RM, but not really an uncontroversial argument for a undiscussed move. cyberdog958Talk 14:52, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No one uses the term “black comedy” anymore. Since when? In my experience, it's used all the time. I would also note that Dark humor converts a neutral title into an American English one. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would also note that Dark humor converts a neutral title into an American English one. So, the article would be moved to Dark humour (British spelling) instead? GTrang (talk) 00:50, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Although no template, it's written in American, and humour is currently considered the common name (spelling wise) as opposed to humor, but not without numerous exceptions; Jewish humor, anti-humor, theories of humor, humor styles, office humor, and more. Yet another good reason for an RM to establish common name. CNC (talk) 11:27, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Percy James91 Strong oppose. The article is currently the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, it has many times more page views than the other articles combined. Annh07 (talk) 06:51, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Tangentially, this move request needs to specify what should be done with the base page name to avoid WP:MISPLACED. More to the point, this has been discussed before and is thus ineligible for technical move requests as a WP:PCM. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 00:43, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Red0ctober22 this should be discussed as it was discussed back in 2019, even if fairly low in participation. This is also a popular article and would probably benefit from the attention. ASUKITE 13:08, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I second. WP:TITLE "Wikipedia [...] generally prefers the name that is most commonly used." Based off of their branding, I would say that SiriusXM is commonly used. As a matter of fact, I don't recall ever seeing it mentioned as "Sirius XM." Their current website addresses the name as "SiriusXM." Additionally, the name/logo is a trademark, so I believe we should format it as described in WP:BRANDING, which states that (if I interpreted it correctly) it must match or be as close as possible to the branding.In their logos/corporate branding, there is no space clearly visible between "Sirius" and "XM."
(I have no clue if this comment belongs here or on the talk page of Sirus XM itself, if it is in the wrong place, please let me know) ItsTheComedianYT (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

[edit]
Edit this section only if your request requires an administrator. Usually, do so if the page has been fully protected or move protected (see this guide to which moves need administrators). Place your request in another section if it only requires a page mover.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Technical_requests&oldid=1298241164"