Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
    
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

[edit]

Uncontroversial technical requests

[edit]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

[edit]

Contested technical requests

[edit]
@HHH Pedrigree although it looks like anybody could move these, a discussion may still be ideal as such moves are now at risk of being reverted. ASUKITE 13:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Media Mender This sounds like your contesting the RM then? I've moved it here on that assumption, but apologies if I read too much into your comment. Fortuna, Imperatrix Mundi 11:18, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Tassedethe, would you mind having a look at this request. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:16, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This has previously went through 3 RMs in the past and thus would be controversial. Tenshi! (Talk page) 13:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Joe vom Titan WP:PRIMARYTOPIC grabs are not uncontroversial and per the pageviews Bunnypranav linked to, there doesn't seem to be a clear primary topic. cyberdog958Talk 07:54, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

[edit]