A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One Direction article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
One Direction is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music of the United Kingdom, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Music of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Music of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Music of the United KingdomMusic of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bradford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bradford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BradfordWikipedia:WikiProject BradfordTemplate:WikiProject BradfordBradford
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands
One Direction is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
There are two questions:
Should One Direction be described in the past tense ("was", "were", rather than "is")
Should all members be listed as past members in the infobox or just Zayn Malik and Liam Payne?
Past tense and all listed as past members. It's been 8 years, for all important intents and purposes One Direction is broken up (there has been essentially no group activity over this entire time period), and the Wikipedia article should reflect that. Hemiauchenia (talk) 11:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per US Weekly, the band reportedly split up several months after the "indefinite hiatus" began [1] Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL, and the article can be changed to "is/are" if the band ever reunites. EDIT: NME article from 2023 says that 1D have not formally discussed a reunion, and consistently described all 5 as "former members" [2]Hemiauchenia (talk) 04:32, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Given the fact that the five members have pursued solo careers and the band is no longer active after 2016. As the infobox shows years active 2010–2016, regardless of Malik's departure and Payne's death, it is clear that there is no activity going on for this band; the first sentence at least must not use present tense to cause confusion to readers and a contradiction in between the history section and infobox. Also, please remove the indefinite hiatus footnotes from the infobox or avoid using the word hiatus when there is no reunion or resumption yet. 14.0.158.69 (talk) 23:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here's an reminder regarding Payne's death for Editors:
On this wikipedia, the subject is the band One Direction, Payne's death is not part of the band history, anything about him, please go to his own biography page. we should be focusing on writing one direction as a band, as the main subject between 2010 and 2016 only (not individual). Just briefly mentions payne's death in the Legacy section and Band members section. 14.0.175.205 (talk) 20:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Past tense and all past members, but note I have nothing rooted in Wikipedia's guidelines to support my opinion. I just think it's the right thing to do. Liam's death makes it all the less likely 1D will ever re-form, anyway. mftp danoops22:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There hasn't been much discussion for a bit of time in regards to this, is it safe to say that the discussion can be closed? As there looks to be a consensus towards having it both "past tense" and with evidence being pointed towards "past members" as in recent sources, the members are referred to as former members. HorrorLover555 (talk) 15:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I submitted a request for closure yesterday when the template expired. It looks like consensus is for "past tense", but because of how contentious the change seems to be I thought it might make sense to have an uninvolved party close. Thesixthstaff (talk) 16:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since One Direction are not publicly active, listing the "current" members would only be an assumption. The article can be updated to whatever a statement says if and when it's released, but for now I think they should be listed as past members as they are described by sources. Miklogfeather (talk) 22:38, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Both band is inactive as a matter of fact; we shouldn't be using the word hiatus (lit.'A temporary absence from the public or the mainstream.') to describe both, as we cannot predict whether they will have a comeback in the future. Per WP:CRYSTALBALL. 14.0.158.69 (talk) 09:24, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I mostly agree with describing it in the past tense. But how do we draw the line on hiatuses? Liam's death might eliminate the chance of a reunion, but, before that, what would be the difference from another band like Radiohead for example? Both have been inactive for years and their members became involved with other projects Lucafrehley (talk) 21:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We know that Radiohead reunited for rehearsals, and sources don't call the band members "former members" or "former bandmates" like for One Direction, so I'd say if up-to-date sources most commonly describe the band or all the band's membership in the past tense, and there's no evidence of activity, it should be written so on Wikipedia. Miklogfeather (talk) 22:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The indefinite hiatus would go toward a one direction of a lifetime and beyond. Let's not face it — Everything that has a beginning comes to an end.14.0.158.69 (talk) 00:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Present tense and only Zayn Malik and Liam Payne listed as past members. I would like to shift the focus of this discussion away from non-policy-based arguments. If we want to say that they have broken up permanently, then Wikipedia policy requires a source which explicitly says this. This discussion needs to be based on an analysis of reliable sources, but thus far, no one has provided or analyzed any sources. The official word in August 2015 was that the band was not splitting up: see this NYT article quoting a tweet from Niall Horan and Louis Tomlinson. However, I was recently reading Liam Payne's obituary in The New York Times, and it actually does state directly: But in January 2016, the band split, Us Weekly reported. That Us Weekly article cites an anonymous source: Five months after announcing they would begin an extended hiatus in March, One Direction’s Louis Tomlinson, Niall Horan, Liam Payne and Harry Styles will split, a source close to the British boy band reveals in the new issue of Us Weekly. If it is true that the band split in 2016, I'm pretty surprised that we missed this, so I looked back in the talk page archives, and there was a small discussion about the article: Talk:One Direction/Archive 3#Band split. Someone did actually try to cite the Us Weekly article saying that the band has disbanded, but another person pointed out this Billboard article which reported that Billboard's own anonymous source denies the breakup news, saying nothing has changed regarding hiatus plans for the group, and all will be revealed in due time from the band members’ own mouths. All of this is actually mentioned in the article itself under the 2015–2016: Made in the A.M. and hiatus section. Because of this discrepancy, we continued the present tense format to this day, and as far as I can tell, Payne's death hasn't changed anything. We are still waiting for some official source (or alternatively a clear consensus in reliable sources) to say that the hiatus is actually a permanent split, before we can say in Wikipedia's voice that it has become a permanent split. There are a number of traditionally reliable sources reporting the group's status as still on "indefinite hiatus": see Reuters[3], BBC[4], The Guardian[5], CBS News[6]. Mz7 (talk) 01:45, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What have music publications such as NME and Record Collector had to say about the band's status? (hiatus, split, etc.) Not just recently, but going back eight or so years: Record Collector often produce articles about bands that haven't done anything for a while. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As do countless other articles, and I doubt there's a single source listing Horan, Styles and and Tomlinson as current members unless it's parroting this Wiki page. Miklogfeather (talk) 13:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Present tense and only Zayn Malik and Liam Payne listed as past members: Listing all members of One Direction as past members could cause significant confusion because it would suggest that the band has officially disbanded, which isn't true. While One Direction is on an indefinite hiatus and Zayn Malik left in 2015, the group has not officially dissolved. Marking everyone as past members could mislead readers into thinking the group no longer exists, when, in fact, there’s always the possibility of a reunion. To avoid this confusion, it’s better to reflect the hiatus status while only listing Zayn and Liam (due to his passing) as past members, and keeping the rest as current but inactive members. Btspurplegalaxy💬🖊️03:48, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"always the possibility of a reunion" this is literally true of all bands, and Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL. Zayn Malik was part of the joint statement made by the surviving 1D members after Payne's passing on the official 1D social media accounts, which implies that there is no meaningful difference between him and the 3 supposedly remaining members of 1D. Hemiauchenia (talk) 04:39, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While he is mentioned in the statement, it does not change the fact that he left the group. It is important to use the infobox correctly. Moving the three current members to the past members section would not align with its intended purpose. Regardless of the hiatus duration, the group has not disbanded, and the remaining members should still be listed as current members. Btspurplegalaxy💬🖊️05:57, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On the contrary, having three "current" members could mislead the reader into thinking they have continued as a trio, which isn't known. They are all formerly One Direction members, even if they didn't officially disband, as per coverage of the group. Miklogfeather (talk) 13:42, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it would cause confusion, as the current lineup reflects the group's status. Most people are aware that Zayn left in 2015 and that Liam sadly passed in 2024. The members aren't 'formerly' part of the group, since there hasn't been an official disbandment. Listing all members as past members isn't the right approach. The infobox is designed to show both the current and past lineups accurately. Btspurplegalaxy💬🖊️04:24, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Past tense. Why not we just state that fact they all five have gone solo after 2016. It is much more accurate. Using the word hiatus is vague and controversial. I am still not understanding why this wikipedia doesn't mention about their solo career at all. For the member list situation, all five on their biography page on wikipedia, their infobox writes "Formerly of One Direction". 14.0.158.69 (talk) 04:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let's rewrite the first paragraph or the lede on here. To address all the issue and update to reflect the current situation of the band below. 14.0.158.69 (talk) 07:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Past tense and all listed as past members. There has to be a point where no news from a hiatus becomes marking the band as inactive. Nearly a decade feels sufficient; the number of reports from the past few days describing "former" members, plus the statement from members including Malik implying an absence of any current lineup, tips the balance in my view. U-Mos (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The current second sentence is ungrammatical, reading The group consists of Niall Horan, Harry Styles, Louis Tomlinson, Zayn Malik until his departure in 2015, and Liam Payne, until his death in 2024 (emphasis mine). If this RfC is decided in favour of present tense, I think that sentence should be changed to something like The group consists of Niall Horan, Harry Styles, and Louis Tomlinson. It previously included Zayn Malik until his departure in 2015 and Liam Payne until his death in 2024. Pinging Redrose64 who reverted my earlier attempt at fixing the grammar – any objections from you (or anyone else) to implementing that now as a temporary solution, in line with the current status quo of present tense, until the conclusion of this RfC? No opinion on present or past tense apart from that. Rummskartoffel20:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with using the sentence "The group consists of Niall Horan, Harry Styles, and Louis Tomlinson" unless a reliable source says so. It gives the impression that One Direction have continued as a trio which is speculation at this point. If present tense is decided, I suggest changing "The group consists of Niall Horan, Harry Styles, Louis Tomlinson, Zayn Malik..." to "Whilst active, the group consisted of Niall Horan, Liam Payne, Harry Styles, Louis Tomlinson, and Zayn Malik until his departure in 2015" or something along those lines, with Payne's death being noted later in the lead like Britannica does. Miklogfeather (talk) 21:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rummskartoffel: I am not favouring one side or the other, I'm trying to prevent people from pre-empting the outcome of this ongoing RfC. Here's the thing. Beginning soon after the Liam Payne news broke, this article has attracted a lot of attention, with people making edits that were nullified by other edits soon after. On 17 October, Hemiauchenia started a discussion, and on 18 October, opened this RfC. There's nothing wrong with that, discussion is good, but while the discussion is ongoing it is disruptive to ignore that discussion and make exactly the kind of edits that are being discussed. That basically says "I don't care what other people feel, this is what I want it to read". --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:19, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that's what you mean, but for the avoidance of doubt, I wasn't aware of the RfC when I edited, and I wouldn't have edited if I had been.
This acknowledges that the band isn't formally dissolved while also listing the core members of the band during their active period as well as Zayn's departure. Liam Payne died way after the band's active period, which is why I didn't include it. Referring to other bands with members who died outside of the active period such as The Beatles, Pantera. or Kara, death of a member usually isn't listed when introducing the members BUT it does appear in other parts of the bio.
('example 1: The Beatles bio, "Lennon was murdered in 1980, and Harrison died of lung cancer in 2001. McCartney and Starr remain musically active.")
('example 2: Pantera bio,, On December 8, 2004, Dimebag Darrell was shot and killed on stage by a mentally unstable fan during a Damageplan concert in Columbus, Ohio. Vinnie Paul went on to form Hellyeah after his brother's death, and died of heart failure in 2018,[8] leaving Brown and Anselmo as the only surviving members of the band's best-known lineup.)
So I imagine Payne's death can be mentioned in the part of the bio where the members are confirmed to have gone off on solo careers.
Proposed for 1D page: The band went on indefinite hiatus in January 2016, allowing all members to pursue other projects. During this period, Payne died in 2024 after an accidental fall a third-floor balcony at a hotel in Buenos Aires, Argentina. - K-popguardian (talk) 03:25, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The image was removed recently for unclear reasons after having been stable for years. I restored it and that was quickly reverted without discussion here. A peer review doesn't mean that every single change suggested should be made - and edit warred on! - without discussion. This is the only image we have showing the group on tour in another country than the usual ones. I will restore it again unless a good removal reason is given and consensus reached. The article needs global coverage. SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:40, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
One Direction greet Swedish fans in Stockholm, May 2012
There wasn't an edit war? I just reverted it once and gave an explanation. I'm not sure what the "usual ones" means; the article has images of them in Australia, England, Scotland, Chile, US. At the end of the day, it's just the luck of someone going to their concert, snapping a photo, and uploading it under a license we can use. Regardless, the location is not important, the quality and EV of the images are. The image (pictured) is really poor quality and does not have strong EV. True, it's been on the article for years, but that isn't a reason to let it stay. I'm planning on taking the article to FA so images will need to be high quality and have some sort of purpose, which I don't think this one has. I tried looking for substitutes (pictures of them interacting with fans) but couldn't really find any (would love to be proven wrong). I'm open to comments from other editors though; @David Fuchs:, pinging you since you're the one who brought this up. jolielover♥talk16:07, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It has been my opinion since I began to contribute in 2008 that image quality is not the main/only prerequiste for the inclusion of a rare image to illustrate a relevant part of an article and thus improve the article. This image is not awful, does what it's intended for and is relevant as such. Re: reverting reverts w/o talk & using edit summaries - giving an explanation there - for some sort of consensus, I've written to your talk.--SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:12, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This was not taken at a concert, it's from a special appearance w/o any performance on a terrace in the trendiest part of the Swedish capital and was photographed by a person living right there who noticed all the hoopla with a few hundred fans screaming. We should appreciate, not eliminate, such free photos which very few people are willing and able to upload to Commons. This one was perfect for the important "Image" section (which also has disappeared). --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that image quality is second to the EV, however in this case the EV is not strong at all, it's not a historically significant picture, it's not exactly rare (there are plenty of instances of them interacting with fans), and it doesn't contribute much to the article. I merged the image section into various other sections since a lot of the content overlapped or was redundant. If you want, we can go to Wikipedia:Third opinion for a resolution. jolielover♥talk05:49, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If there are "plenty of" free images at Commons of them interacting with fans, by all means add one, and preferably then showing them in a country where English is not the main language! (I don't believe they've sung in Swedish?) The article isn't exactly over-illustrated in it's current post-peer-chopped form. SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:19, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Not done: The group disbanded and all members parted their own ways, therefore making it past members. Valorrr (talk) 15:28, 23 March 2025 (UTC)