No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Ad Orientem (talk) 17:52, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 00:00, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
It's likely a false positive. It sounds like "Except you." Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:49, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:10, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 08:10, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:50, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 04:50, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 08:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism Opm581 (talk) 04:38, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:33, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unreferenced edits from IP users, plus copying/pasting already posted references and falsely masking them as references. Hotwiki (talk) 06:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent rash by IPs changing middle name to nonsense. Geraldo Perez (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – 6 IP edit reverts in a row. Changing IP addresses. IgelRM (talk) 08:07, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:44, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Edit-warring between IPs regarding the order of actors' names in credits; this is the same issue that led to the previous protection on this page. High level of IP vandalism. (213.109.192.23 (talk) 08:19, 22 February 2025 (UTC))
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:48, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Because of the lingering ethnic and religious tension in the country and in the diaspora, unsourced edits are pile up to an extent where it gets hard to control what is right and sourced and what is not. SdHb (talk) 11:43, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:57, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There's been several IP edits to this page adding unreferenced information. They are possibly a former member of the band, or in some way connected, as they seem to be adding personal details about lineup changes. I've reverted these twice already, but they keep coming back with a new IP address and adding it all back in. Requesting Pending changes protection to hopefully force this person to create an account and engage in some discussion about referencing on Wikipedia etc. Jimmyjrg (talk) 11:52, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Removal of sourced information continues after protection ended. Semsûrî (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Declined – I've warned the IP about edit warring, which you should have done. If they resume, they'll be blocked. Favonian (talk) 17:55, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated spamming (arbitrarily overwriting files) by multiple socks of AADITH KRISHNA, since December 2024. The Doom Patrol (talk) 16:28, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism, likely from a single sockpuppeter over a long period of time. Has been consistently vandalized with k-pop related nonsense since mid-2024. Each time protection expires the vandal comes back on new accounts or IPs. Back again with 3 different presences after protection expired. seefooddiet (talk) 17:58, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by multiple IPs in short period of time. — 🪫Volatile 📲T | ⌨️C 18:09, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Various IPs and SPAs continue to mess with the infobox result field, despite extensive discussion that found unanimous consensus based on reliable sources (see talk page). We are having to revert a couple times a day. The IPs and SPAs do not engage in discussions. It was previously protected, after the protection ended the IPs and SPAs returned to disrupt the article. GreenC 18:33, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V(💬✒️📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V(💬✒️📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V(💬✒️📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V(💬✒️📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [3]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V(💬✒️📂) 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
That's good to know, because I have the same problem that Vanderwaalforces talks about. I will have to get back to this item. Schwede66 07:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
It is my 8th year of editing (4th with this account). I have written a number of articles of various types and none have been permanently deleted. I have made mistakes, but understand what they were and how to avoid them. About to publish many geography stubs (manually written, differing in content, not violating MASSCREATE - see Ledenice and Zapeć for examples). Articles like Cirsium greimleri, First Vrbnik Breviary, Petər Klepəc and Veternica are more representative of my work, though. Ivan (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
91 main space articles, 45 rated above stub, no deletions. I mostly create articles for albums or BLPs of musicians. GanzKnusper (talk) 09:26, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
The user has created 189 articles, and only two have ever been deleted—with one later restored. They have a strong understanding of reliable sources (WP:RS) and are well-versed in BLP policies (WP:BLP). I've reviewed one or two of their articles, and I believe they truly deserve the rights. Baqi:) (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request Autopatrolled permissions. I have experience in creating and editing articles, particularly in Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) and good understand on notability guidelines. I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including verifiability, neutrality, and reliable sourcing. I am committed to continuous learning and will ensure that any pages I create meet Wikipedia's standards. I will handle this permission responsibly and always strive to improve my contributions.Thank you for considering my request. Endrabcwizart (talk) 18:47, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
@Endrabcwizart: One of your creations was recently deleted at AfD for notability concerns, and it seems Binay Shah has been tagged for similar reasons. I also looked through Nitin Chand, and in addition to the overall poor formatting, contains this sentence: "With over a decade of active work, Chand has successfully created more than 150 music videos and commercials, showcasing his expertise in the industry", which violates the neutral point of view policy. At the moment, it seems your work will continue to benefit from review from new pages patrol.If you're looking for resources to help you improve, make sure you're familiar with the content policies, and the Manual of Style would be good to start incorporating as well. It's also important to note that even otherwise reputable news organizations in the Indian subcontinent have a track record of publishing paid promotion disguised as real coverage. These are not reliable and should not be cited. For example, this source in Prakash Subedi (lyricist) is one. The Teahouse has experienced editors who can help you out if you need it, and feel free to reach out on my talk page if you have any questions about my message. Good luck! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:36, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Not done, per above. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 08:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I would like to use AWB for repetitive editing tasks. I do these a lot for the projects I am a part of, and they have become very tedious.
Edit: one of the projects I am a part of for a Church, does not have very many active contributors but a very large backlog. The effort to maintain the articles we have would be largely simplified by using AWB.
Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 21:49, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: I would like confirmed rights so that I can make edits on this account, used on public computers. I am the user ScrabbleTiles. ScrabbleTiles (Public) (talk) 21:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I confirm this is my account. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 21:28, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Arcticocean requested that, "If [I] wish to gain [ECR] again, the onus would be on [me] to prove that trust has been regained." To address this challenge, I would like to respond to the two concerns raised:
1. "You have added translated content from other Wikipedias without attribution."
2. "You have artificially split your article contributions into separate edits to more quickly reach a high edit count."
1. Translated content without attribution
In October 2024, I misunderstood the rules regarding proper attribution for translated content. Since January 2025, I believe I have consistently included proper attribution in all my edit summaries, as demonstrated in these examples: here, here or here.
2. Split article contributions
Regarding this concern, I would like to clarify that my first 350 edits, made between 2006 and 2013, occurred before the 500 edits rule was introduced (2016). These edits could not have been intended to meet a requirement that did not exist at the time.
I acknowledge that I intentionally split my contributions to reach the 500 edits threshold, only for the remaining 150 contributions needed to meet this target.
However, since then, I have made over 700 additional contributions (~1200 in total) without splitting them. This can be seen in my average edit size, which is approximately 350 bytes and aligns with averages observed among contributors, including administrators.
I hope this explanation demonstrates my commitment to addressing the concerns raised and regaining trust. Michael Boutboul (talk) 15:19, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for extended confirmed declined in the past 90 days ([4][5]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([6]). — MusikBottalk 15:20, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Boutboul: ultimately you're well in excess of 500 non-gamed edits, so Done. But I'd really encourage you to be especially cautious about any edits you make involving the Arab–Israeli conflict; editors who cause problems in that area can be blocked or topic-banned very quickly. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 09:00, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Thank you, I’ll be cautious Michael Boutboul (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I was previously an editor here with an extended confirmed account (User:M3ATH). I am now on this account and would like the extended confirmed right to be transferred. MT(710) 16:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
I can confirm that User:MT-710 is the account I now use. —M3ATH (See·Say) 16:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights: I would like to request rights so that I can edit most articles on this account, my one for use on public computers. I am the user ScrabbleTiles, which is an account with ECP. ScrabbleTiles (Public) (talk) 07:58, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
I confirm this is my account ScrabbleTiles (talk) 08:07, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag.
Event coordinator
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I would like to be a new page reviewer, I continuously contribute to New Pages and having failed the previous request to be one, i would like to try once again having positively learned more and contributed to much more new pages. Pizza on Pineapple(Let's eat🍕) 07:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBottalk 08:00, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) You made you first edit to Wikipedia just over a month ago and have made only 389 edits to mainspace. This still falls short of the the minimum criteria linked to above for this user right, and admins may call for additional experience.Tagging of pages for deletion is best left to qualified New Page Reviewers. We do need more reviewers so I would suggest you thoroughly read and understand the tutorial at WP:NPP, and then reapply in a couple of months when you have a measurable track record. You may also wish to enroll at the NPP School. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:39, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Not done: In addition to what Kudpung has recommended, I would also suggest spending some time at AfD. Feel free to come back when you have more experience. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:18, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I have authored a few articles, commonly support and help new editors, and enjoy helping the community by encouraging proper creation of articles and assisting with maintenance. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 21:48, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 216 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBottalk 21:50, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
Not done As stated in the guidelines for granting, individuals requesting this perm should have at least 500 undeleted mainspace edits, which you do not have. I recommend spending more time learning Wikipedia's policies, participating in AfD, and contributing to the mainspace. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:26, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I mostly engage with improving new pages like adding cats, short desc., etc. and also quite active in AFD, would like to help further in the new pages patrol in reviewing for quality and to help with the backlog. AgerJoytalk 17:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 373 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBottalk 17:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Not done As stated in the guidelines for granting, individuals requesting this perm should have at least 500 undeleted mainspace edits, which you do not have. I recommend spending more time learning Wikipedia's policies, participating in AfD, and contributing to the mainspace. For AfD, I'm specifically concerned about your !votes that do not meaningfully contribute to the conversation. While it can be beneficial to occasionally !vote delete with a rationale of "fails GNG and no indication of notability", I'm concerned with how frequently you !vote in this manner (e.g., [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:33, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello again, I was granted NPR for the January backlog drive, and reviewed 48.4 in total. I was planning to do a lot more, but I quickly learnt it's best to stick with subjects I'm familiar with, mainly English football, so didn't end up doing much beyond that. Anyway, I'd like to continue reviewing. I doubt I'll be a prolific reviewer, but otherwise happy to handle what I come across, and participate in future backlog drives as required. I only had a couple of re-reviews, so I welcome any admin to check over other reviews I've made. Thanks. CNC (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Sohom Datta (expires 00:00, 27 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 18:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to try and help out as a new page reviewer. Want to do a bit more than Editing, Destubbing and creating BLPs! Davidindia (talk) 09:37, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors.
I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations.
I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([13]). — MusikBottalk 17:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Requesting extension of new page reviewer permissions. Hoping to continue contributing to reviews of newly created pages. I can also review new pages in the Croatian and Ukrainian page spaces Barrettsprivateers (talk) 21:14, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 21:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request New Page Reviewer rights. I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia. I have experience in assessing notability, checking for proper sourcing, and improving article quality. I read carefully to the WP:AFD, WP:PROD and WP:CSD. With my auto-confirmed status, I have been reviewing and improving new articles, ensuring they meet Wikipedia’s guidelines. Having the New Page Reviewer rights will allow me to contribute more effectively by patrolling new pages and maintaining content standards. Sackiii (talk) 05:26, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had an account for 8 days and has 380 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBottalk 18:00, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting the renewal of NPP reviewer rights following participating in the January 2025 backlog drive to continue contributing to NPP reviewing. Ewhite31 (talk) 10:24, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Joe Roe (expires 00:00, 28 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBottalk 10:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary(talk2me!)(stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ahecht just curious, would you object to a grant here? If so this should be declined for now. Otherwise I'd consider granting since PCR is a pretty newbie-friendly permission. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
@Elli I haven't re-reviewed their history, but if there have been no significant red flags since mid-January I'd be fine with granting. --Ahecht (TALK PAGE) 17:54, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
I have been an active contributor to Wikipedia and focused on editing articles, reviewing new pages & combating vandalism. I am requesting for PCR right to speeding up the review process for pending changes. I am familiar with key Wikipedia content policies, including vandalism, biographies of living persons (BLP), neutral point of view (NPOV), verifiability, and copyright compliance. I've also been involved in patrolling recent changes, where I use Twinkle tool to revert vandalism. With my experience and understanding of these policies, I believe that I can effectively contribute to reviewing pending changes. 𝐌P⚚𝛂n 𓃠 {✝alk} 20:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
I'm well familiar with Wikipedia policies. And in my spare time I am always on duty to combat any vandalism or violation of Wikipedia policies. This right will serve me well. Thanks! Vellutis (talk) 18:48, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([14]). — MusikBottalk 18:50, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
I understand pending change policies well, in addition to my knowledge of general Wikipedia editing policy/procedure. I would like to further contribute in this way. Thanks. Peace, Thorn6130✝ (talk, ask questions, dispute) 00:14, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting reviewer rights to help improve the quality and accuracy of Wikipedia articles, particularly in areas related to Pakistan and some notable international articles like television shows and international cricket. I also created a page Kana Yaari directly, which is a result of my performances on Wikipedia. I have gained experience through consistent and constructive editing, and I am familiar with Wikipedia's content policies, including neutral point of view, verifiability, and reliable sourcing. I aim to assist in maintaining the integrity of semi-protected pages and contribute to the efficient review of pending changes. Currently I'm a auto confirmed user rights. Sackiii (talk) 20:47, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had an account for 3 days. — MusikBottalk 20:50, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Not done You seem to have no idea what you are requesting. * Pppery *it has begun... 22:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I routinely edit (especially recently) and have a reasonable editing history for which a track record can be established (see my userpage). I have read WP:VD, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:V, WP:!, WP:C and the guideline on the reviewing process for RPC. HKLionel (talk) 12:24, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to help in Reviewing pending changes as I'm familiar with all the policies and guidelines for RPC and I'm doing constructive edit regularly. AgerJoytalk 07:10, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Requesting rights to intervene against vandalism. I've been patrolling recent changes & have reviewed a lot of changes. I was declined last time as my account was new. I'm familiar with all the policies of vandalism and pending changes. Regards, XiphoidVigour༈Duel༈ 09:15, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([15]). — MusikBottalk 09:20, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I edit Wikipedia quite frequently, particularly fighting against vandalism and I think that if I had this right, it would enable me to be a more helpful and better user. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I've previously requested rollback twice but I'm here a third time to ask once again. I think rollback would be much easier in loads of situations. I patrol certain pages and help maintain others, and I've had the experience of needing to revert numerous edits but since I do not have the rollback feature I have had to manually revert the changes, which take up too much time and are quit time consuming, not to mention tedious. So I am here once again to request rollback in order to revert vandalism, unconstructive edits or misinformation as well as other tid bits. Lemonademan22 (talk | contribs) 23:17, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([16]). — MusikBottalk 23:20, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
There have been too many times when multiple rounds of improper edits/vandalism on pages I follow have required individual reversions, so having the rollback permission would be useful. Coining (talk) 04:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I mainly edit on pages related to sportscar racing, where unregistered users often edit multiple small things (often going against the page consensus at the time) in the span of a few minutes. This role would be particularly useful to be able to rollback these edits at once. I check my watchlist multiple times a day and I am quite active in general. Thanks for your time. SportscarFan2004 (talk) 09:40, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I request rollback rights. I need rollback rights to more conveniently eliminate vandalism in English wiki. In addition, I have rollback rights on Russian wiki and I am also actively eliminating cross-wiki vandalism. I have read the rollback policy and am ready to follow it. Oostpulus (talk) 08:35, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 45 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBottalk 12:00, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.
Template editor
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at Waters http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Calmer Waters.
