User talk:Flux55

Archives

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1998 Andhra Pradesh cyclone has been accepted

1998 Andhra Pradesh cyclone, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:49, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Storm Poly has been accepted

Storm Poly, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taxila (disambiguation) has been accepted

Taxila (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Flux55. Thank you for your work on Taxila (disambiguation). Aviram7, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aviram7}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	Thanks for adding some sources to various list articles! Keep up the good work. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greyhound Top Speed

Yep, no idea really how to cite it because it happens to be work that I am doling in greyhound race tracking. I posted a bit more here (https://www.quora.com/How-fast-can-a-Greyhound-run-in-MPH/answer/Misha-Charrett), but at some stage I will add it formally somewhere. In short, I might be the only one on the planet that can give a verified speed (I have one two 2 decimal places in m/s)

Reference to the system here - https://www.thedogs.com.au/news/2021-03-15/grnsw-launch-world-leading-race-data I am the software developer that has developed and maintained the database so I have access to all the raw data

I find it amusing that now I have actual real data, everything on the web is just plain wrong ;-)

Mishac67 (talk) 10:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, this is my website (https://www.mcssolutions.com.au/), this is my client (http://brook.com.au/), and here is a link to the API I developed (https://api.brook.com.au/) - needs an API key though. Eventually will put something public to confirm Mishac67 (talk) 10:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oof. That's obviously a point-of-interest problem (see WP:COI), so you can't really add that data... ''Flux55'' (talk) 12:43, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes and no. This will be actual calculated verifiable data that is used by Racing NSW, Victoria, South Australia etc - all the State-based racing bodies that run greyhound racing in Australia. The hardware was "commissioned" for its initial use by these official bodies. So this isn't opinion, like the current greyhound maximum speeds, which have no actual factual reference behind it. This is measured data (not an opinion). My main interest here is correcting the obviously incorrect values quoted everywhere. Any thoughts? Because the max speed quoted in the Wikipedia page is demonstrably wrong (by some margin). Maybe I can get this data out onto the Greyhound Racing NSW web site? Mishac67 (talk) 12:50, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oof again. You stated that you were "commissioned" for this data, which falls under WP:PAID and you haven't enclosed that yet. So double no. ''Flux55'' (talk) 13:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again, not quite. I develop the code that processes the data, which will be used by official racing bodies. Much like sporting game stats produced by a third party are used by the sporting bodies. Looks like it might just be easiest to get the data published on the official site (which won't have any reference to me). I totally understand the need to have verifiable data, but this was just an observation by me that all the quoted values on the internet are wrong. I don't really care, because I just deal in data, but it's a little comical that the "agreed" values currently are just plain wrong Mishac67 (talk) 13:45, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has been an interesting exercise (as part of my work) to prove something that is "common knowledge" to be in fact, just plain wrong Mishac67 (talk) 12:55, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the page to use only official sources, so got an update without resorting to using my data for now. You can tidy up the links and how they are used (I'm not good at references), but the official sectional times and the link to how long each sectional is will confirm my calculations Mishac67 (talk) 14:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:33, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali Smith (disambiguation) has been accepted

Ali Smith (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 15:36, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:39, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 Australian region cyclone season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Innisfail.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season has been accepted

Timeline of the 1991 Atlantic hurricane season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Union (disambiguation) has been accepted

Sacred Union (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 16:54, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Froid (disambiguation) has been accepted

Froid (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NotAGenious (talk) 18:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment

An official reassessment isnt needed if the article is at AfD or has an open merge discussion. If either discussion closes with a consensus where the article would cease to exist, you simply delist it and update the article history. There wouldn't be a need to create a review. Noah, AA^Talk 23:30, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Waffle House (disambiguation) has been accepted

Waffle House (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

94rain ^Talk 00:36, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1991 AHS timeline

Hi there Flux55. If it's okay with you, I would like to submit this as a featured list candidate sometime within the next week or so. (Obviously, as the timeline's creator and primary contributor, you would be getting nomination credit.) I've been going through the main timeline section with a fine-tooth comb and adding coordinates, landmark-relative locations, and other tweaks to try and get it to featured level. I'll be looking for images to add after I hit the "add topic" button. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 02:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ''Flux55'' (talk) 02:33, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! ''Flux55'' (talk) 03:18, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

You're the one who treats sources like a gift from non-existent God *rolls eyes* 70.109.151.215 (talk) 04:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are one of the pillars of this site. If you don't have them to support your claim, then don't implement it. Also, that (Chinese? Taiwanese?) user implemented advertising in their see also, and I'm not sure why you reverted that edit as well. ''Flux55'' (talk) 04:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blah, blah blah! I need my sleep now school tomorrow 4 me 70.109.151.215 (talk) 04:31, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't actually replied to my criticisms. Welp, at least try to source your changes. ''Flux55'' (talk) 04:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1998 Bengal cyclone (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 1998 Bengal cyclone instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This 1998 Cyclone - BOB1 already exists.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1998 Bengal cyclone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

User4edits (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Flux55! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! User4edits (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	Only saw one of your edits because it came up as may be vandalism on the filters but it was an amazing edit keep it up! Toketaa^talk 17:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Storm Poly

On 1 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Storm Poly, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Storm Poly caused hundreds to be stranded at Amsterdam's central station as it passed the nation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Storm Poly. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Storm Poly), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About Deaths in 1979

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Deaths in 1979 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Draft:Deaths in 1979. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ItsCheck (talk) 00:21, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I made that when I wasn't too experienced with Wikipedia so you can delete it anyways ''Flux55'' (talk) 00:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Flux55 I am not an experienced Wikipedia editor and therefore I cannot complete your request. Please let me know how to delete a Wikipedia page. Thank you, ItsCheck (talk) 00:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I just realized you aren't an admin. ''Flux55'' (talk) 02:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Flux55! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:51, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1959 North Indian Ocean cyclone season (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 1950s_North_Indian_Ocean_cyclone_seasons#1959_season. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1959 North Indian Ocean cyclone season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

User4edits (talk) 07:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeot has been accepted

Jeot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 08:03, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for helping the southern hemisphere tropical cyclone and for updating the season's article. HurricaneEdgar 15:12, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

Hello, Flux55,

You are a very new editor and I think you should hold off on tagging articles and drafts for speedy deletion. You are marking drafts as promotional that are not at all spammy or similar to advertising. You especially shouldn't be tagging drafts for deletion so soon after they have been created by brand new editors. Those editors are not familiar with all of the rules on Wikipedia and this is kind of slap in the face. Focus less on autobiographies and more on drafts about companies, it is easier to tell when these are promotional. But if someone is just writing a biography about an individual, it will of course will be focused on that person, that doesn't mean that it is promotional.

As a new editor, you should emphathize with other new editors who might not be familiar with all of the policies and guidelines on the project. How about posting some Welcome notices with links to resources rather than tagging their first efforts for deletion? Try to educate them, not chase them away from the project. You are an ambassador, not an enforcer. The only criteria to be absolutely vigilant about are copyright violations and content that violates BLP policy which is usually vandalism and can be tagged for immediate deletion.

If you have questions about this and the criteria for speedy deletion, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged Draft:Shawn Zeng for deletion 4 minutes after it was created and the editor was working on it! It's a draft. You should give content creators at least an hour to work on their new articles and drafts before tagging them. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:34, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And it looks like you created the User:Biswasng29 page just so you could then tag it for deletion! This makes no sense at all and you left a snarky comment on the editor's user talk page that I needed to remove. I'll look over your contributions and if the rest of your editing is this disruptive, I might have to issue a ban from you tagging any pages for deletion. You don't seem to have the knowledge or maturity to do so responsibly. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see... ''Flux55'' (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024 GOCE drive award

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Flux55 for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE January 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 03:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2023–24 South Pacific cyclone season

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023–24 South Pacific cyclone season, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gustav von Epstein has been accepted

Gustav von Epstein, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 09:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit

Hey man im josh (talk) 16:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ''Flux55'' (talk) 16:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Flux55, I'm interested in what experience I need for this role. Just wondering. Thanks, ItsCheck (talk) 00:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Flux55. I regret to inform you that, based on valid concerns raised on my talk page, I'm reversing the granting of this perm. You are welcome to reapply later on once you've gained a bit more experience and addressed the concerns that have been brought up on your talk page. Hey man im josh (talk) 10:26, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftification

Hello, Flux55,

Unless you are a blocked editor who is returning to edit here, you do not have the experience to be draftifying articles from main space. You are not informing the content creator of what you are doing and you don't have the editing experience to judge when draftifying is appropriate. Please slow down, you are moving way too fast and I'm afraid you are going to crash if you keep taking on administrative tasks with only a month's editing experience. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I actually had no idea that draftifying pages was for admins. I will note that the user who moved it was an even newer user than myself, moving it to article space despite not being reviewed yet.''Flux55'' (talk) 05:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		You have been a great contributor to Wikipedia, and are learning exceptionally fast. I support your curiosity in asking me questions, and your extreme dedication to Wikipedia is visible on your XTools page. Thank you for reviving the dead WPTC community and happy editing! 2003 LN 6 20:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:1979 Andhra Pradesh cyclone

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:1979 Andhra Pradesh cyclone, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 10:27, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Storm Pia (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at 2023–24 European windstorm season instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Consider merging it with the parent article 2023–24 European windstorm season. Need for a standalone article is not justified. Discuss in talk page for splitting the article if needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Storm Pia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 00:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 February newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup is off to a flying start, with 135 participants. This is the largest number of participants we have seen since 2017.

Our current leader is newcomer Generalissima (submissions), who has one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher) and 10 GAs and 12 DYKs mostly on New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures. Here are some more noteworthy scorers:

AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), with one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, and two DYKs;
Vami_IV (submissions), with one FA on Doom (2016 video game), one GA on Boundary Fire (2017), and 11 reviews;
MaranoFan (submissions), with one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and two DYKs;
Skyshifter (submissions), with one FA on OneShot and one DYK;
Sammi Brie (submissions), with five GAs and five DYKs on television and radio stations;
voorts (submissions) and Elli (submissions), both with one FA and one DYK each.

As a reminder, competitors may submit work for the first round until 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February, and the second round starts 1 March. Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round; currently, competitors need at least 15 points to progress. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Joe Boy Junior

Hello, Flux55,

Do not tag a draft page for deletion as a "test" only 5 minutes after the page was created! Five minutes is not enough time to create an article, much less develop content and reference the page. In fact, we don't delete "test" drafts until they have been around for a few weeks or months. If this is a new editor, then there is a lot to learn about creating an article and learning about Wikipedia policies, guidelines and standards.

Please do not rush to tag pages for deletion. You are still a new editor and if you have ever created articles yourself, you should be able to empathize with new editors who are learning the ropes. The guideline for patrollers is to wait at least an hour after the editor has stopped editing before tagging a page for deletion unless there are issues with copyright violations, BLP-violations, advertising or vandalism/offensive content. Things are more relaxed in Draft space because readers will not encounter these pages so we allow blank pages, incomplete pages, half-written sentences and all sorts of inadequate writing because they are only drafts. Try patrolling in the main space instead, this is where there is more of an urgency to remove inappropriate content. Unless the content is inappropriate as described above, there is no rush to delete draft articles.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alabaster

When you write about a company

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls

Your sources were basically the company website and many pages just quoting or interviewing the founders. We don't care what they say, we need independent third-party sources.

The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

it's all about what the company sells, little about the company itself. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, management structure, turnover or profits. It doesn't even appear to have headquarters or production facilities, from what you tell us.

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

You say their bibles trended on TikTok. The source for this is the Chungs, not TikTok, and not a criterion for notability, even if it's true

You have sections on celebrity endorsements, apparently sourced to the Chungs rather than the celebrities. Endorsements are not a criterion for notability, even if they are true, just look spammy.

You have a "citations section" which is basically links to the Chungs talking about themselves and their bibles, just promo

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

I didn't check.

Basically your article is many links to the Chungs talking about their company, i.e., promo, no real facts about the company, and sections which are irrelevant to notability as linked above, and just provide a platform for the company's founders to tell us how wonderful they are

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:17, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! ''Flux55'' (talk) 12:20, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tropical Storm Debby (2006) into 2006 Atlantic hurricane season. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Debby

Hey there, looks like you missed a few minor things. For starters, if you're merging an article and copying the content, be sure to add {{redirect from merge}} to the old redirect. I'm sure you saw the message above this, which mentions the copying of text, so be sure to include that in the future. Also, on the talk page, you have to delist the article as a good article. You can see in this edit what that looks like. Does all of that make sense? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! ''Flux55'' (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wirobrajan has been accepted

Wirobrajan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 17:47, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
1,013	History of Hinduism (talk)	Add sources
206	Bracelet (talk)	Add sources
79	Owlchemy Labs (talk)	Add sources
202	Secretary General of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (talk)	Add sources
134	Hermiston, Oregon (talk)	Add sources
246	Mandiant (talk)	Add sources
664	Economic history of India (talk)	Cleanup
26	Interactive video (talk)	Cleanup
111	Afro-Asians in South Asia (talk)	Cleanup
60,327	Instagram (talk)	Expand
1,635	Precipitation (talk)	Expand
20,266	Gmail (talk)	Expand
2,796	Indian subcontinent (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
940	ITVX (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
286	Hot or Not (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
630	Recommender system (talk)	Merge
228	Geomatics (talk)	Merge
134	Google APIs (talk)	Merge
124	Project Zero (talk)	Wikify
328	Severe weather (talk)	Wikify
113	My5 (talk)	Wikify
2	Baghdadi, Ozurgeti Municipality (talk)	Orphan
2	Cabinet Haslauer jun. I (talk)	Orphan
3	Antonio Pelayo (talk)	Orphan
126	Onpassive (Dubai Metro) (talk)	Stub
25	17th SAARC summit (talk)	Stub
86	Jhumair (talk)	Stub
19	Credible minimum deterrence (talk)	Stub
19	SAARC Fountain (talk)	Stub
42	Matt Nathanson: Live at Google (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Signature test

Flux55 (my talk page) 17:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions to ANI

You have only been editing here for a few weeks, which is a very short time, and do not seem to have a great grasp on what a useful contribution at administrative noticeboards looks like. I was hoping that after this exchange, you might step back, but since then you've continued making edits at ANI that do not seem constructive to me. I'd like to encourage you to stop engaging in ANI discussions in which you are not involved, unless you have looked carefully into the situation and have a substantial or unique contribution to make. Thanks for considering this request, JBL (talk) 17:18, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JayBeeEll: It's true that Flux has not been editing a long time, but I don't think I'd call over 1.5 months a "few weeks".--Bbb23 (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: At one point in my life I had a long-running joke with some friends that revolved around an assignment of precise values to "few", "some", "many", etc. Probably they would have agreed with you that "7" is not "a few". Personally, I first commented on ANI when my account was about 18 months old (though with fewer edits than Flux has -- they're editing at a very high rate for a new user, which is probably why there ANI comments were so noticeable). It looks like you took a little bit longer to find your way there (21 months or so). --JBL (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chitra Wagh (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoglophie was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chitra Wagh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

zoglophie^•talk• 16:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 March newsletter

The first round of the 2024 WikiCup ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 27 February. Everyone with at least 30 points moved on to Round 2, the highest number of points required to advance to the second round since 2014. Due to a six-way tie for the 64th-place spot, 67 contestants have qualified for Round 2.

The following scorers in Round 1 all scored more than 300 points:

Generalissima (submissions), who has 916 points mostly from one FA on John Littlejohn (preacher), 15 GAs, and 16 DYKs on a variety of topics including New Zealand coinage and Inuit figures, in addition to seven reviews
Vami_IV (submissions), who has 790 points from two FAs on Felix M. Warburg House and Doom (2016 video game), two GAs, one DYK, and 11 reviews
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who has 580 points from one FA on Hö'elün, two GAs on Mongolia-related articles, two DYKs, and five reviews
Sammi Brie (submissions), who has 420 points mostly from nine GAs and seven DYKs on television and radio stations
MaranoFan (submissions), who has 351 points from one FA on Holidays (Meghan Trainor song), a nine-article FT on 30 (album), and three DYKs
Skyshifter (submissions), who has 345 points from one FA on OneShot, one DYK and two reviews

In this newsletter, the judges would like to pay a special tribute to Vami_IV (submissions), who unfortunately passed away this February. At the time of his death, he was the second-highest-scoring competitor. Outside the WikiCup, he had eight other featured articles, five A-class articles, eight other good articles, and two Four Awards. Vami also wrote an essay on completionism, a philosophy in which he deeply believed. If you can, please join us in honoring his memory by improving one of the articles on his to-do list.

Remember that any content promoted after 27 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paterno v. State of California has been accepted

Paterno v. State of California, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Xegma(talk) 15:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

yes

I've blocked your account until you can explain your creation and use of multiple undisclosed accounts, including:

Ominateu (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
RandomManna106 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
The Generic Fool (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Plus what appear to be a number of throw aways of sleepers. I knew you were using the RandomManna account, but there was no overlap so I looked the other way. The creation and extensive use of Ominateau, however, is a clear violation of WP:SOCK.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, you can make an appeal via RandomManna106. I doubt it's your first account, but it's the oldest one I found in this check.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:20, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Accepting~~ Commenting on your own article at WP:AFC? Tsk tsk.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC) corrected per Dylan620's note below.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 00:26, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: It should be noted that the AFC was approved by administrator Beland; Flux posted to the RandomManna account's talk page thanking Beland. Still... really bummed to see this. Flux looked like an editor who was over-enthusiastic with jumping into maintenance/backroom areas, but he was writing good content and seemed to have a lot of promise. We even co-nommed an FLC (still ongoing) that sprung from an AFC submission he created and got approved. That being said, I can't defend such blatant misuse of multiple accounts. Flux: I hope to see you back here someday, but I urge you to read Wikipedia:Standard offer and follow the guidance there. I wish you the absolute best. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Ponyo, for taking action. If you look at this User talk page, you'll see I posted a fair number of warnings to them because they were editing in areas that new editors rarely jump in so quickly and they were just racking up hundreds, no, thousands, of edits. I watch the Move log and that is often where you can see returning, experienced editors pretending to be new editors. I just asked Drmies about another new account that is acting precociously. Not smart behavior if you are interested in appearing to be a newbie. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

Sammi Brie (submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Travel Tuesday has been accepted

Travel Tuesday, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette^Edit! 15:19, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Cyclone Fabien (2023)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Cyclone Fabien (2023) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 19 § Cyclone Fabien (2023) until a consensus is reached. Icarus58 (talk) 07:53, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Typhoon Peipah

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Typhoon Peipah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fuji Corporation

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fuji Corporation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tropical Storm Sanba (2023)

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tropical Storm Sanba (2023), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Taishan University

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Taishan University, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The KPC Group

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The KPC Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Artificial Intelligence in fake news

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Artificial Intelligence in fake news, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AI's role in misinformation

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AI's role in misinformation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tetsuya (disambiguation)

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tetsuya (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Highmarket

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Highmarket, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Storm Bettina

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Storm Bettina, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of storms named Phil

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of storms named Phil, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Virginia Velasco Condori

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Virginia Velasco Condori, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2000 Bangladesh cyclone

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2000 Bangladesh cyclone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pailin's Kitchen

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pailin's Kitchen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cyclone Chloe

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cyclone Chloe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Typhoon Clara

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Typhoon Clara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Typhoon Iris (1976)

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Typhoon Iris (1976), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Storm Isha

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Storm Isha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Storm Irene (2024)

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Storm Irene (2024), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tropical Storm Dom (1986)

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tropical Storm Dom (1986), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:La Prisión

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:La Prisión, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1879 Louisiana hurricane

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1879 Louisiana hurricane, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Timeline of the 2019 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Timeline of the 2019 North Indian Ocean cyclone season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Tetsuya (disambiguation)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Tetsuya (disambiguation), was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1998 Oman cyclone

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1998 Oman cyclone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:05, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Colton Bennett

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Colton Bennett, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1998 Bengal cyclone

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1998 Bengal cyclone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Storm Bettina

Hello, Flux55. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Storm Bettina".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cyclone Ferdinand

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cyclone Ferdinand, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of storms named Phil

Hello, Flux55. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of storms named Phil".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jennifer Anguko

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jennifer Anguko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Typhoon Clara

Hello, Flux55. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Typhoon Clara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:László Onestyák

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:László Onestyák, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joseph Ishikawa

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Ishikawa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Timeline of the 2019 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

Hello, Flux55. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Timeline of the 2019 North Indian Ocean cyclone season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:02, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Chitra Wagh

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chitra Wagh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1982 Burma cyclone

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1982 Burma cyclone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Storm Pia

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Storm Pia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cyclone Ferdinand

Hello, Flux55. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cyclone Ferdinand".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1959 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1959 North Indian Ocean cyclone season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cyclone Boloetse

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cyclone Boloetse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cyclone Keni

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cyclone Keni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cyclone Felicity

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cyclone Felicity, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Allbridge LLC

Hello, Flux55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Allbridge LLC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]