User talk:Iowajason
American Quaker practices (re: geneology)
[edit]Thanks for your note on the WP Qualer Project page. I have posted:
- The precision and comprehensiveness of Quaker record-keeping is of great benefit to historians and genealogists. Part of the reason for this precision is the British State's failure to recognise Quaker marriages. This made it particularly important to make and update one's Will and record the births, marriages and deaths of one's children and Quaker relations(if you wanted probate to be granted and no non-Quaker relations to challenge the validity of the Will). The accuracy of Quaker BMD records make them particularly valuable for Historical demography. I am not aware of U.S. practice or when the U.S. began to recognise Quaker marriages. A good guide to Quaker genealogy is
- My ancestors were Quakers : how can I find out more about them? by Edward H. Milligan and Malcolm J. Thomas. - [New ed.]. - London : Society of Genealogists, 1999. ISBN 1-85951404-9
- I hope someone, with more knowledge than me, can draft and additional paragraph. Thanks for the suggestion, Iowajason! ===Vernon White (talk) 18:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Elgin O'Hare 2014 project map.pdf
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Elgin O'Hare 2014 project map.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 06:20, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- The short version of the copyright issue with the map goes like this:
- Creations of a state government or state agency are not automatically in the public domain like their federal counterparts.
- Unless we could show otherwise, the map is a work for hire of an agency of the State of Illinois, even if the study has federal funding. ISTHA would be the agency that either employs the map's creator or contracted with the map creator's employer, even if they used federal funds to pay for the work.
- Since 1978, no copyright notice is required to attach a copyright to a work; in fact, once any person writes, draws, composes, or performs a "creative work", there is an automatic copyright in the US.
- Imzadi 1979 → 07:09, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination for deletion of Template:IPA/Transwiki Redirs
[edit]
Template:IPA/Transwiki Redirs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:IPA/doc/Transwiki guide
[edit]Template:IPA/doc/Transwiki guide has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:IPA/Transwiki
[edit]Template:IPA/Transwiki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Jo Daviess Conservation Foundation for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo Daviess Conservation Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.