Jump to content

User talk:Lockesdonkey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hall–Héroult process

[edit]

Would you mind adding a cite to your edit on Hall–Héroult process? I would like to find out more. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:05, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of games with mutable rules

[edit]

The article List of games with mutable rules has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced essay, fails WP:OR and WP:NOTDIR (Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics )

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 01:37, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic text

[edit]
check-mark
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Why does my Arabic text come out in traditional Naskh rather than modern print Naskh? It never did before. I find it makes Arabic text less legible.

A new system called ULS (for Universal Language Selector) has recently been deployed by the WMF, and I think this is almost certainly the cause. On an article with Arabic script, look by the entry "Languages" at the foot of the left-hand sidebar, and you will see a cog-wheel symbol. Click on that, and a dialogue box pops up with various language settings. I don't know in detail how it works, and five minutes search at places like WP:ULS and Help:ULS draws blank. If tinkering with that doesn't fix your problem, ask at WP:VPT. I am about to ask there where is the documentation for ULS. JohnCD (talk) 17:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Found it - see mw:Universal Language Selector and mw:Universal Language Selector/FAQ. JohnCD (talk) 17:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! This helped me restore Arabic text back to "normal". Mohamed CJ (talk) 01:09, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hoboken, New Jersey

[edit]

Hi. Please do not add your unsourced analyses to articles, as you did with these edits to Hoboken, New Jersey. As a veteran editor like you should know, such material cannot be added if it is not supported by reliable sources cited in the text. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:17, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Opting in to VisualEditor

[edit]

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 100 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:24, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Fried egg, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

[edit]

Your upload of File:3-panel diagram.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:13, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uncited additions to Starfish

[edit]

Hallo, I see that you have added quite a strong claim to the Starfish article to the effect that 2 other groups of Echinoderms are 'widely' used as food. To prove this, you will have to identify sources that specifically make this claim - it would not be sufficient to find one or two places or peoples that use them as food (that would be Original Research). However, all this is a bit academic as you have not provided any sources at all, which is not just WP:OR, it fails WP:Verifiability. I have therefore commented out your proposed text, awaiting suitable citations, which I suggest you put on the Starfish Talk page rather than in the article so they can be reviewed.

I note also that you have already been warned by other users for making uncited additions to other articles. This behaviour is deprecated here on Wikipedia; it reduces the quality of articles -- and Starfish is a Featured article, and has been extremely thoroughly reviewed -- and causes extra work to other editors to repair the damage. I do hope you will take care to find sources for all future additions you make to articles. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Postscript: I am astonished to discover you are a veteran editor - I thought by the warnings you have been receiving on this talk page that you were more or less a newbie. It really is essential for people with experience to take care when editing. We all get tired at times - best to take a break if so and maybe to try again later. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MBC MASR, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bassem Youssef (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox Moroccan Royalty styles

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox Moroccan Royalty styles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:01, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Market East Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Trenton Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of the Philippine Sea may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Force 58 was commanded by Vice Admiral [[Marc Mitscher]] aboard his flagship, {{USS|Lexington|CV-16)}} of Task Group 58.3. Spruance, who exercised overall command of the [[U.S. 5th Fleet]], flew his
  • some made attacks on the picket destroyers {{USS|Yarnall|DD-541}} and {{USS|Stockham|DD-683)}} but caused no damage. Between three and six bombers broke through to Lee's battleship group and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:01, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flying Fish Brewing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mansfield Township, New Jersey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flying Fish

[edit]

Where are you getting the information for the specific township "honored" by each Exit Series release? I can't find it anywhere. Or are those locations just where the exit is physically located? --Fru1tbat (talk) 17:01, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's the physical location, except for Exit 9, where it's kinda obvious. Their site on the Exit Series does mention specific areas that are truly supposed to be "honored;" I put the physical location as a semi-placeholder (since they aren't wrong) until I had the time and energy to suss out how to best accurately include that information. Lockesdonkey (talk) 17:06, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok - for now I've reverted it (hit enter before I finished typing my edit summary) - I think having the physical location there as a "placeholder" is probably confusing, and I saw on the Exit Series site that certain areas were mentioned, but as there isn't a single prominent location called out for each beer in the series, it probably isn't worth including. --Fru1tbat (talk) 17:16, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smoked egg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Château Cheval Blanc, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plonk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Law Journal...

[edit]

I just wanted to drop a note to your page to reflect my response on the Help Desk. Let me know once you enter it with WP:AFC or if you are having problems with something like infoboxes.Naraht (talk) 16:12, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Two suggestions.

Help desk reply COI

[edit]

This may help...Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide--Moxy (talk) 16:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aguascalientes may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Cite book" redirect

[edit]

In 2012 you participated in a discussion about various "cite x" template redirects (e.g. "Cite journal", "Cite book", etc) at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 August 30#Cite journal. The redirect "Cite book" was nominated for deletion yesterday (31 August 2014) and your input into the discussion would be welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 August 31#Cite book. Thryduulf (talk) 12:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion (October 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Fiddle Faddle 17:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Lockesdonkey, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fiddle Faddle 17:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anchor Bar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vernors, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ABC and WXYZ. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ring road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstate 275. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Fee tail

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Fee tail, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC) --MiguelMadeira (talk) 11:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion

[edit]

Hello, Lockesdonkey. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:57, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 28 November

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demurrer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Motion to strike. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Share taxi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mercedes and Sedan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of fictional military ranks for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional military ranks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional military ranks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.★Trekker (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Lockesdonkey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question

[edit]

Hi Lockesdonkey, why did you make this edit? It seems to be against the Manual of Style. See the third bullet point here: "Links should not be placed in the boldface reiteration of the title in the opening sentence of a lead." AmateurEditor (talk) 05:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

[edit]

clarify

Thank you for quality articles such as List of Bundestag constituencies, Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh and United Nations Security Council election, 2013, for gnomish work such as redirects, for improving clarity, for service from 2005, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1856 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

[edit]

Stop with the captions. Use Talk pages and get consensus. Dave Dial (talk) 04:44, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peameal bacon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Lockesdonkey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese language

[edit]

Lockesdonkey السلام عليكم اخي لقد زرت صفحتك الشخصية في ويكيبيديا العربية والتي هي بإسم طالب 89 وقد ذكرت فيها في احدى صناديقك انك تجيد اللغة الصينية وانك تمتلك حساب في ويكيبيديا الإنجليزية لذا قررت ان انشئ حساب لي بالانجليزية لتساعدني على ترجمة هذه المقالة الصينية لانني لا اعرف شخصا في ويكيبيديا العربية يجيد اللغة الصينية لذا ارجوا منك ان تترجم لي هذه الجملة الصينية

概要

於2004年4月至2006年10月在Comic Bom Bom連載。東京電視台以漢字表記《韋駄天翔》，在2005年10月1日至2006年9月30日每週的星期六早上9:30開始播放、全52話。 السورميريراسلني (☎) 09:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC) محمد ماجد السورميري (talk) 18:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • و عليكم السلام. للأسف كنت خارج البيت ولم أجد رسالتك حتى هذا الرد. وللأسف أيضا لا أقدر ترجمة هذه الجملة الصينية حيث لا أفهم كل الرموز. أفهم أن موضوع الجملة تتعلق بالمانغا أو الفنون اليبانية وشيء حدث في توكيو. لا أفهم أكثر من ذلك. كما أقول في الصندوق، كنت أتحدث الصينية على مستوى متوسطة على الأكثر، والآن لم أتحدث بالصينية منذ تخرجي من الجامعة في ٢٠١٢. يجبني تغير الصندوق، وأعتذر إعتذارا كاملا لهذه المشكلة.
Lockesdonkey (talk) 23:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arabic language

[edit]

Lockesdonkey Please respond to my request which I sent to you in Arabic Language on your Talk page محمد ماجد السورميري (talk) 18:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flamen Dialis

[edit]

I backed out your change specifying Caesar's age. We don't have any clear references that state his age for the office specifically, merely our inference for how old we think he must have been at the time. The consensus data of his birth in 100 BC is not definitive, it might have been as early as 102 BC. So we can't say that he was a particular age upon becoming Flamen Dialis. Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 04:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reasonable. I might have said "as a teenager" or something equally vague, but that works. Tarl N. (discuss) 04:28, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Coat of arms of the Second Spanish Republic.PNG

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Coat of arms of the Second Spanish Republic.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:India-centric

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:India-centric requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:49, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great Phenol Plot

[edit]

In this edit, you split a paragraph in half and did not make sure to copy the source cited into the first of the two resulting paragraphs. This a very damaging edit to an article. Many sourcing issues are created by such edits. When an entire paragraph is sourced from citations at the end of the paragraph and you split the paragraph, please make sure to copy the citations to ensure WP:V continues to be met. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 17:36, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting small help

[edit]

Hello many greetings,

Requesting your proactive contribution and support in updating Draft:Aurats (word) in relation to the languages you know well.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 02:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chenery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Treats!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laches.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Containerization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Golden Arrow.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mafia Commission Trial

[edit]

Hi. Any difference between Mafia Commission Trial and United States v. Salerno? Should they be merged? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 22:58, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not particularly up on this history (I just added the infobox because I saw the information was there and I was on a lunch break), but it seems to me that they are connected but separate. It's possible that United States v. Salerno was an appeal from an aspect of the trial. However, they are clearly separate; the Supreme Court case is strictly about a legal question of the permissibility of pretrial detention, while the Mafia Commission Trial case is about the criminal investigation and trial. They're sufficiently different they should be different articles, though if someone picks through the documents and shows that the pretrial detention question arose in the same litigation as the trial, they should link to each other and possibly be cross-referenced in the infobox. I'm just not really in the mood to go dig up the appellate history of the SCOTUS case in Westlaw and cross-reference it with newspaper articles right now. Lockesdonkey (talk) 00:47, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the rational response. Sounds good. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 01:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Greek politics/leadership race

[edit]

Template:Greek politics/leadership race has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 02:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edmund

[edit]

Thanks for the explanation for your edit. Template:Infobox saint says where to place the infobox, but I think as Edmund was known for being a saint more than for being a king of East Anglia, we have an example here of where the guidelines can be ignored. Also, if it's put lower down, the Saint infobox pushes an image down, an affect that does not occur if the box is positioned higher up. Amitchell125 (talk) 14:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Levantine Arabic FAC

[edit]

Hi Lockesdonkey, I nominated Levantine Article for FAC. As you contributed to Egyptian Arabic in the past and given your knowledge of Arabic, I thought you could be interested in reviewing this nomination. Thanks for any help you can provide. A455bcd9 (talk) 08:28, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Shinto shrines in Russia

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Shinto shrines in Russia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Cutter requests

[edit]

Hi Lockesdonkey, I noticed you made some edits to the Stephanie Cutter article. I was wondering if you'd be willing to take a look at the open edit requests I have on the Talk page. I think it would help clean up the article and remove some redundancy. I won't make any edits myself due to my COI. Please let me know! PrecisionChristian (talk) 17:13, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine Hepburn's accent

[edit]

I read the article which deals with this accent, and, accordingly, I didn't understand whether this accent was chiefly British or American. Listening to Katherine Hepburn convinced me that this accent was predominantly British, to say nothing of Billie Burke. I'm a novice in phonetics, so could you help me with answering this question? Роман Сергеевич Сидоров (talk) 07:51, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spider Boy (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cuisine in Mexico City

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cuisine in Mexico City indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:IsPa5.PNG

[edit]
Notice

The file File:IsPa5.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal file. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:55, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:09, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deaths by stabbing in Rome has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Deaths by stabbing in Rome has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Kanpachi" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Kanpachi has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 5 § Kanpachi until a consensus is reached. asilvering (talk) 21:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

adding more information and improvements to the Tony Blair article

[edit]

@Lockesdonkey There is a lack of both information and consistency in the main article for former British Prime Minister Tony Blair as it haven't been significantly expanded in recent times. I have asked some of my fellow editors on Wikipedia but some can't collaborate on improvement due to different fields of interest. The main problem I find is that there is a large absence and no mention any of the significant policies of Blair during his premiership like for example the introduction of the minimum wage, SureStart programme, tuition fees, granting of devolution to Scotland and Wales, council and housing reform, constitutional reforms, the environment, immigration and so on in "Policies" section of his article. In the "Prime Minister: 1997-2007" there should be information on the three general elections he contested and won as prime minister also a added information on the details and history of his cabinets. I would happily like to collaborate with you on this expansion of Blair's article on policy but unfortunately I have been tasked with improving the article on 1972 United Kingdom miners' strike for the following days to come so for that reason I want to ask and request you to add this information before my participation. Me and other editors seeking to improve articles on British politics and history will greatly appreciate your help in adding the aforementioned policy initiatives and actions. ZombieBruce (talk) 13:44, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lockesdonkey&oldid=1248432057"