User talk:Masktapeisawesome

Hello Masktapeisawesome! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Hipal (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

A lengthy welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Countdown (2019 film), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Jade Wang Founder of Sandstorm.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Jade Wang Founder of Sandstorm.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 08:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Nancy Guerra, dean of the School of Social Ecology at UCI.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Nancy Guerra, dean of the School of Social Ecology at UCI.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 08:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Nicolas Girard, Former Member of the National Assembly of Quebec.png

Thanks for uploading File:Nicolas Girard, Former Member of the National Assembly of Quebec.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:48, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Reiko Aylesworth, Actress.webp

A tag has been placed on File:Reiko Aylesworth, Actress.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 04:47, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Mississippi State Senator Bradford Blackmon.webp

Thanks for uploading File:Mississippi State Senator Bradford Blackmon.webp. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 15:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maastricht Hours, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Illumination and Evangelists. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grauno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Notis Peryalis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Symbolism and National Theatre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to List of Eta Kappa Nu members, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 21:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ronit Raphael

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ronit Raphael requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pollia (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ronit Raphael moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ronit Raphael, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 22:14, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ronit Raphael.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ronit Raphael.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emil Elimelech

Hello, Masktapeisawesome

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Emil Elimelech, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:26, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Emil Elimelech moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Emil Elimelech. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:17, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jewish Indian theory have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 17:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ronit Raphael (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I only found TheMarker and Globes as a reliable and independent sources but besides these there isn't any significant coverage in other references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ronit Raphael and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 01:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Masktapeisawesome! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 01:23, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Kal Male

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Kal Male to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages needing translation into English, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article may be listed for deletion. Thank you. EatingCarBatteries _{(contributions, talk)} 06:22, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kal Male moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kal Male. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and the referencing is unclear and parts of the article still need to be translated into English.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Abecedare (talk) 12:21, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Machine translation?

Masktapeisawesome, do you know Cebuano language, Fiji Hindi, etc or are you using machine translation? Abecedare (talk) 12:25, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Phronia riparia moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Phronia riparia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Moriwen (talk) 15:52, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for for lack of communication regarding your spree of new article creations based on (machine?) translation, some of which have had to be draftified or are otherwise problematic.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Abecedare (talk) 15:42, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I assume this guy will be unblocked as soon as he replies. But if it helps, note that this guy's edit to one of my articles was great. - Burner89751654 (talk) 16:27, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I too hope that the block can be temporary. All I am looking for is a plain language explanation of their activity, and a willingness/ability to discuss and address the issues as they arise. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 16:36, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles written in the greatest number of languages

Thanks for your edit on Wikipedia:Wikipedia articles written in the greatest number of languages. That was amazing. How'd you do that? If there's a program to make that update automatically, then we should run it regularly. - Burner89751654 (talk) 16:26, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I used a Python script that I made. I have a file "articles.csv" with all of the articles and their category and subcategory. The script that runs through each article, sees how many languages each article is in, and then formats it all into a wikitable like the one that appears in "Wikipedia:Wikipedia articles written in the greatest number of languages".

Edit as of May 26, 2025: I previously had the code here, but I've decided to move it to the Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia articles written in the greatest number of languages Talk page.

I updated my algorithm I've made for Wikipedia articles written in the greatest number of languages and put the updated version in it's talk page. The newer algorithm is both way faster and fixes some errors. Masktapeisawesome (talk) 02:33, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I assume that putting the article names in quotation marks let it handle articles with commas. And I don't follow all the coding (I don't know python), but it looks like the upshot is that now if we link to a redirect (like Drums plural), this new code can get the number of translations for the underlying article (Drum). Right? Excellent, if so. It's probably better that way. Although when the old code couldn't do that, it actually did have a side benefit. It helped identify which entries were redirects, so we could replace them with direct links. We don't really need to replace the redirects. But it's cool that we have the option. Maybe Wikipedia already had a program to identify which links are redirects, but I've never seen one.

In any case, there are a few other changes that might be good. Would you change it so that it sorts first in reverse order by translation count, then subsorts (in regular order) by category, then subcategory, then article name? I find that most useful. Also, someone on the talk page recently requested that we change the table so that the article name column is on the left, then the number of languages, then the category, then subcategory. That's fine with me, and if anyone's going to make that change, then we might as well do it now, while you're working on it. They also suggested we add a column with each entry's rank, but I think that's a bad idea, since it'd be a pain to maintain as the rankings change. You could incorporate it into your code, but it would still be a pain for people just updating a single entry without using your code.

Also, now that we can update all the records easily, we might as well get rid of the "last updated" column. We can just put a single note at the top of the article with when it was last updated, and a reference to the code on the talk page to update it.

Thanks again for your help with this. If you want to run it every month, that'd be great. Although the translation counts don't change very quickly. Once a year is probably good enough. - Burner89751654 (talk) 15:24, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the Wikipedia page and the code for the algorithm according to your suggestions. Masktapeisawesome (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the sorting and column order is working well. Although I still think the rankings will be too hard for most editors to maintain. It looks like someone has already messed them up, since you updated them yesterday. Someone added a record for Warsaw, with 240 languages. That should've bumped the Portuguese language, with 239 languages, from rank 236 down to rank 237. But they didn't update it. - Burner89751654 (talk) 01:59, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

People are constantly adding records to the table, so make sure to update your code to include them before you run it. I edited the code on the talk page to mention that. Although I'm not sure whether each record in your code needs to be on a separate line, or if they can just be separated by spaces. It looks like when you typed in the code, they were on separate lines, but Wikipedia displays them as just separated by spaces. - Burner89751654 (talk) 04:32, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Masktapeisawesome (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry that it took so long to respond. I truthfully don't check my talk page or notifications that often. I didn't realize how many of my articles were deleted or draft-spaced. Anyway, I will admit that I did use machine translation to translate all of those articles that have been moved to draft space or deleted. I know it's against the rules, and I am ashamed that I ever brought myself to break them. To be fair, I did check (by translating from language X into English and then English into language X and back again) that the translations were accurate, but still, rules exist for a reason, and it was not fair for me to break them. Additionally, I should have also fixed all of my citation errors. Citations have always been a weak spot for me, and I thought to myself, "there are Wikipedia editors who dedicate all their editing to fixing citation errors", let me focus on what I'm good at, and they focus and what their good at. However, I now realize that my logic was wrong and damaging; if I cause a problem, I have to fix it, simple as that. Additionally, I should have checked that all URLs were working. I foolishly thought that if the citation was valid in another language, I didn't need to check it for any problems. I was wrong. In the future, I promise to fix my mistake. I promise to only translate articles from languages that I know (Hebrew and Russian) and always check that the citations are working and are properly formatted. I will also check my notifications more often so I can communicate with other Wikipedians faster and fix problems Wikipedians have detected in my work. I hope that the administrators choose to reinstate my editing privileges. I promise to learn from mistakes and do better in the future.Masktapeisawesome (talk) 19:32, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Given the commitments in your unblock appeal, I'm happy to unblock you. I hope you'll help clean up the articles you created previously and also keep in mind that English Wikipedia's sourcing and notability standards can differ from ones in other languages. Abecedare (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Abecadare

Thank you so much for unblocking me. I promise to fix my draft-spaced articles as soon as I have the chance.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phronia has been accepted

Phronia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:41, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]