User talk:Neurodoc99
June 2025
[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Scott Russell Surasky. Neither the Hill nor the Economic Times sources quoted exist, both give a "404 error. The page you are looking for cannot be found". Ldm1954 (talk) 20:27, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at User Talk:Ldm1954, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:34, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Ldm1954. Bobby Cohn đ (talk) 23:49, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Talk:Scott Russell Surasky, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 12:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Removal of comments by others is inappropriate
[edit]@Neurodoc99, I see that you have again made inappropriate edits, removed comments at Talk:Scott Russell Surasky by @Molikog, effectively edit warring with the restoration of this edit by @Materialscientist. You also removed maintenance tags at Scott Russell Surasky which have been reverted by @Molikog. This despite warnings above by myself, @Bobby Cohn and @Materialscientist. Please read carefully the five pillars of Wikipedia, in particular WP:5P4. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.