User talk:S.Taknet

Welcome!

Hello, ShaliniTaknet, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:ShaliniTaknet, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ShaliniTaknet

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:ShaliniTaknet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:23, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your userpage

Hi, Shalini.

I prefer to keep discussion of my administrative actions on-wiki, unless private information is involved, so I'll reply to your email here.

I deleted your userpage because it exceeded the limited level of autobiographical content that we allow. Something like "I am a software developer, content creator, and digital marketing specialist based in Jaipur, Rajasthan" would be fine. But by writing it in the third person, mentioning technical qualifications that aren't relevant to editing Wikipedia, and using moderately self-promotional terminology like "She is recognized for," it came off as more of an advertisement of yourself professionally. Feel free to create a new userpage in line with our guidelines, or better yet, just focus on contributing to the encyclopedia! Note that we're significantly less strict about userpages with people who have already established that they are here to build an encyclopedia.

I hope that clears things up. Please let me know if you have any further questions. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 01:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tamzin,

Thank you for the clarification! I really appreciate your feedback and understand the guidelines better now. I’ll make sure to revise my userpage to align with the community standards, and focus more on contributing to Wikipedia! ShaliniTaknet (talk) 06:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of KDK Softwares for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KDK Softwares is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KDK Softwares until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

B-Factor (talk) 09:18, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi B-Factor,

Thank you for your helpful feedback. I’ve made several updates to the KDK Softwares article based on your suggestions.

I’ve added independent sources that cover the company’s history, partnerships, and role in the industry, which I believe address the notability concerns. I also worked on rewording parts of the article to ensure the tone is more neutral, avoiding any promotional language.

I’ve also made sure every sentence in the article is now properly cited with references from reliable, independent sources.

I really appreciate your input, and I hope these changes meet the standards. Please take a look at the updated version, and let me know if there’s anything else you’d like me to adjust.

Thanks again,

Shalini Taknet ShaliniTaknet (talk) 06:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sea foam art moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sea foam art. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cinder painter (talk) 08:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sea foam art

The article Sea foam art has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I found almost no sources at all for sea foam art as a concept, and certainly none that were reliable with significant coverage. At best this is original research, at worst AI-generated nonsense. The only reference given is simply to a picture that mentions sea foam.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SunloungerFrog (talk) 12:35, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Help in Suffering (HIS) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Help in Suffering (HIS). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 10:38, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, S.Taknet, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Thecoolfactfinder (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 10:24, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Victory Day (India)

Hello S.Taknet,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Victory Day (India) for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:15, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Help in Suffering for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Help in Suffering is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Help in Suffering until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Star Mississippi 13:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]