User talk:Sonipatiya
February 2025
[edit]
Hello. Your recent edit to Sonipat appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:18, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ambala without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Faridabad, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:34, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm PEPSI697. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bharatpur State without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 06:44, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Bharatpur State, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. YuiFujimoto (talk) 07:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bharatpur State. Mr.Hanes 
Talk 17:58, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jat Rebellion (1667–1723). Mr.Hanes Talk 04:50, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
I need to talk at insta or any props
[edit]Hey mr If you are still here, i want to generically ask one simple alienated thing about your recent contributions over Jats expedition which i like most you restore most of its reversible parting and you made an glamorising attempting to make an article on Jat clans which is such a appropriate thing i got so far, So is their anyway to talk you personally just laterally message me at insta[1] interactivity program so i am waiting for your adulated response thanks for having me up.
2409:40D6:10D:60FA:D0EE:C442:1A1A:EAA5 (talk) 12:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.