User talk:Weliviewf

Welcome!

Hello, Weliviewf, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Randykitty (talk) 06:45, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. An edit that you recently made to Shawn Lawes seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Giant Snowman 08:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Evil Queen

Regarding the false positive of the edit filter you hit; I've made the edit on your behalf, and adjusted the filter to be less sensitive. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

December 2024

Hello, I'm FPTI. An edit that you recently made to B. S. Yediyurappa seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! FPTI (talk) 02:58, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nancy Schwartzman. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Again, please do not change the intentional spacing in infoboxes. This is becoming disruptive. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:19, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing: introducing broken templates and other errors

Please slow down, use Preview, and check your edits. You introduced broken templates in this edit. You have already been reverted for this sort of edit. Be more careful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:21, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit, you introduced a big red error to the page. Use Preview and check your edits. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:29, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing: invalid edit summary

You have been asked before to stop using invalid edit summaries, but you continue to do it. When you change the wording of a headline, even if your edit is correct, an explanation is warranted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is another one here. Please slow down. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated request: stop expanding self-closed references

I have asked you before to stop expanding self-closed references, but you continue to do it. Please stop. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing bold formatting from the article topic in the lead

I have asked you before to stop removing bold formatting from the article topic in the lead, but you are continuing to do it. This is disruptive editing. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:26, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonexistent categories

In this edit, you added a nonexistent category. Please do not do this, per WP:CATREDLINK. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:28, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI thread

I have started a thread at WP:ANI about your disruptive editing. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:37, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Weliviewf,

Please participate in this discussion about your editing. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This person just removed the entire article of a page. I had to manually revert it all are we being serious this should not be allowed? @Jonesey95 Objectsshowsarethebest (talk) 22:19, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please link to the edit in question. This editor has not edited since December 9, 2024. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95 List of Gospels i had to manually revert it so it was pretty difficult. Objectsshowsarethebest (talk) 22:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You could have just selected the version before this editor's bad edits (from 15 November 2024) and edited that version. I'm glad you figured it out. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! - Objectsshowsarethebest (talk) 22:52, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing articlespace for a period of 48 hours for making massive, seemingly unexplained removals of content from pages, among other issues detailed above, and not responding when warned and asked about it. Please respond to the above and explain what is going on.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melissa Gross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Human movement.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Cataxia sandsorum, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to Cataxia sandsorum, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same issue at Alice Doyard. We generally don't need common words like "history" and "media" linked. Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 20:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, I'm Fulmard. I noticed that you recently removed content from Indian television drama without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fulmard (talk) 07:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edition

Hi, you made an edit blanking out the discography section of Yazin Nizar, although that section was long, that section now looks empty, wouldn’t it be better if you redo your edit to make it look better? Codonified (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted that removal. The removal was not acceptable. I could possibly see splitting the article and moving that content to a standalone discography page, but I think that would need a discussion on the article's talk page first. Zinnober9 (talk) 17:20, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah i see, no problem, i just needed a little clarity on the topic from you, your edit was logical as that section was long, but i felt leaving it empty would may be not the best solution, but keep up the good work and I thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia 🤠 Codonified (talk) 18:46, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion to split the discography section, you are encouraged to participate and share your views! Codonified (talk) 18:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Codonified, you don't seem to have noticed that the editor who responded to your query is a different editor than Weliviewf. Otherwise, you would have given them a barnstar instead of Weliviewf. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:41, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sh*t you're right, I thought he cooperated thats why, my bad.

I will be mindful next time,

Also thanks for notifying me Codonified (talk) 01:07, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Keep up the good work🤠 Codonified (talk) 18:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits - bold

Hello, I've noticed that in your recent edits, you've removed the bold text on the first mention of a subject's name. Please don't remove it - it is Wiki-standard practice to have that first mention in bold (per MOS:BOLD). Thanks, Jessicapierce (talk) 03:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weliviewf, you are still removing the bolded pagename when it is not appropriate to - please stop doing this. Iiii I I I (talk) 06:18, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another WP:ANI thread

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Weliviewf (again). Thank you. Iiii I I I (talk) 07:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lassi Viholainen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giant Snowman 07:59, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:34, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were pblocked from articlespace before for things like removing massive chunks of articles with your edits, and you are still doing so, and you are failing to communicate with regards to the concerns raised, instead continuing to make these unexplained removals. This is disruptive editing and thus you are blocked until you acknowledge the problem and agree to resolve it. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:36, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]