Jump to content

User:Xymmax

This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I first registered this account - my first - April 20, 2007. Since then, I've gotten involved pretty deeply in AfD work. I see it as a chance to triage articles that are flawed, but may yet have potential. If you need access to a Wikipedia article that has been deleted, ask me. If it's not a copyright violation, libel, or personal information, and has not been deleted as a suspected biographies of living persons violation, I will userfy the article for you.

Note that using the text to recreate any deleted article may automatically qualify them for speedy deletion, and copies of previously deleted content that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion because Wikipedia is not a free web host. We have a list of alternative sites which may be used to host your content.

I maintain a sock account AVPW primarily for use on public networks. In the event of a compromised account, I specifically request any administrator to honor a request from AVPW to block this account, and absolve you in advance of any repercussions.

To do list:


    Add'l links


    CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


    Immediate requests Entries
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    ...from administrators 1
    Requests for unblock 112
    Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 127
    Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 16
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 0
    Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 173
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 7
    Candidates for speedy deletion 59
    Open sockpuppet investigations 248
    Click here to locate other admin backlogs

    AB = Administrative Backlogs

    [edit]

    Administrative backlog

    [edit]

    AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Administrator intervention against vandalism

    Reports

    [edit]
    Doesn't appear to be vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 20:05, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
    FP. PhilKnight (talk) 20:00, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
    FP. PhilKnight (talk) 20:00, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
    FP. PhilKnight (talk) 20:02, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    User-reported

    [edit]


    CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

    Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
    User requested 0
    Empty articles 0
    Nonsense pages 0
    Spam pages 10
    Importance or significance not asserted 2
    Other candidates 47

    The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
    ( source / chronological order / expired )

    UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

    Usernames for administrator attention

    User-reported

    [edit]
    Requests for page protection


    Current requests for increase in protection level

    [edit]
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Reason: Very contentious article documenting a caste; many people have edited the article in order to push their own narrative, which often diverges from reality. I'd like to request that only extended-confirmed can edit.

    In addition, I'd like to request the barring of Devid yadav from editing the article due to repeated reversions of any source conflicting his narrative.
    Thanks, Plastixfy (talk) 18:08, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. If you want a user banned, that is beyond the scope of this noticeboard. Daniel Case (talk) 18:15, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. related to WP:ARBPIA and the recent war with Iran and the Zionist state. I don't see why this is under semi. Freedoxm (talk · contribs) 19:04, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    The main focus of the article is not PIA, at least not for the time being, and I do not see any recent disruption, meaning I do not see any reason to increase the protection level. Ymblanter (talk) 20:45, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: History on this team 74.12.181.3 (talk) 19:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Vandalism 74.12.181.3 (talk) 19:31, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Multiple moves. (CC) Tbhotch 19:59, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:09, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Recent spate of disruptive dynamic IP edits. Possibly more than one person - recent edits have included whitewashing/lauding a self-confessed Hitler admirer, and adding unsourced categories despite edit notes. Something must be on social media drawing these editors in. Unknown Temptation (talk) 21:50, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – The vast majority of edits in the last 2 months have been IPs inserting the subject's surname in violation of WP:BLPNAME. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 22:15, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Reason: Constant incorrect changing of Charlie’s gender and pronouns to female ones Oliverburr (talk) 23:06, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    • Automated comment: @Oliverburr: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:10, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    [edit]
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: The article about this veteran UK television and radio presenter has been protected since 2011, with little vandalism since. Frankster04 (talk) 21:04, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    [edit]
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    There are reports of the new regime in Syria allowing Israeli jets to use its airspace, so Syria could now be listed as 'support' or 'proxy' on Israel's behalf. Israeli leaders have made no secret that they played a role in the dismantlement of the Assad regime through the weakening of Hezbollah, and deterring Iranian planes.

    Additionally, there are allegations of unofficial support from Iraqi Kurdish groups and relations with Israel against the Islamic Republic of Iran, as well as back-channel support from Azerbaijan, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco.

    Germany supports Israel and Merz has made that clear. Italy also supports. Probably limited Canadian and Australian support too. While, the Netherlands and Denmark also participated in "Operation Prosperity Guardian" in the Red Sea against the Houthis in Yemen.

    On the other hand, Iran is supported by Iraq, Qatar, Turkey, Russia, North Korea, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

    It is not 'just' Israel and its Western allies and anti-regime Iranian proxies against the Iranian regime and its proxies in Gaza, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen, but politically it is much more nuanced and many other countries are definitely involved here behind-the-scenes. 188.214.15.197 (talk) 15:05, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Edit requests to that article should follow the WP:EDITXY guidelines because it is covered by 'contentious topics' rules. If the proposed changes do not follow those guidelines there is almost no chance that they will be implemented. And any claim should be accompanied by reliable sourcing that supports the claim. Sean.hoyland (talk) 15:33, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    In the sentence: "The IDF hit a building where several senior officials of Iran's intelligence organizations were staying, was targeted, killing Iran's intelligence chief and other key senior officials." remove:"was targeted," because the sentence doesn't work as is. This seems like the result of an edit that rephrased the sentence but didn't properly remove part of the old one. Parcynthia (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    The Israeli casaulties have changed over the night with new Iranian strikes. I want to change the Current Casaulties from 24 Killed to 53, i have the sources needed. And to change the 2,345 injured to 2,585 injured for which i also have sources. Pkk123477 (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Handled requests

    [edit]
    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
    Protected edit requests

    0 protected edit requests
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:31, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
    20 template-protected edit requests
    v·h
    Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
    Module:College color (request) 2025-05-28 21:08 Template-protected (log) Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "High-risk Lua module: over 55,000 mainspace transclusions"
    Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2025-06-03 11:34 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:Graph:Chart (request) 2025-06-03 22:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-09-04: "High-risk template or module: 5001 transclusions (more info)"
    Template:Starbox astrometry (request) 2025-06-04 21:13 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    User:AmandaNP/UAA/Blacklist (request) 2025-06-05 03:06 Template-protected (log) From User:DeltaQuad/UAA/Blacklist: Modified by AmandaNP on 2016-02-12: "we are going to try letting template editors edit"
    Template:Infobox sports season (request) 2025-06-05 23:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:Infobox election (request) 2025-06-10 22:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2016-03-02: ">9500 transclusions, set to change from SP/A to TE/TE"
    Template:Infobox election/row (request) 2025-06-10 22:26 Template-protected (log) Protected by Plastikspork on 2015-04-13: "Highly visible template"
    Module:Graph (request) 2025-06-11 07:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-17: "High-risk Lua module"
    Module:Mapframe (request) 2025-06-11 13:51 Template-protected (log) Protected by Fish and karate on 2018-05-21: "Highly visible template"
    Module:College color/data (request) 2025-06-14 19:26 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
    Template:IPA pulmonic consonants/table (request) 2025-06-15 00:13 Template-protected (log) Protected by Ivanvector on 2020-02-13: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Post-nominals/CAN (request) 2025-06-15 01:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
    Template:Infobox country (request) 2025-06-17 00:16 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
    Template:Medals table (request) 2025-06-18 18:56 Template-protected (log) Protected by CambridgeBayWeather on 2018-09-23: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Uw4im (request) 2025-06-18 20:07 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-19: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Uw-delete4im (request) 2025-06-18 20:20 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2018-06-04: "Highly visible template"
    Template:Taxonomy/CAM (request) 2025-06-19 09:05 Template-protected (log) Protected by Favonian on 2024-09-01: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
    Template:Country data Israel (request) 2025-06-19 10:13 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
    Template:Taxonomy/Polysporangiophytes (request) 2025-06-19 15:31 Template-protected (log) Modified by TheSandDoctor on 2021-08-21: "Highly visible template - 79k uses"
    Updated as needed. Last updated: 23:31, 19 June 2025 (UTC)


    RFA= Requests for adminship

    RFP= Requests for permissions

    Autopatrolled

    [edit]

    I've been here for almost two decades, with 30k+ edits and a fair number of articles created in the mean time. I believe I am well-qualified for autopatrolled perms. _dk (talk) 23:50, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

    Hi. Based upon my learning and experience over the years of editing on Wikipedia (almost a decade now), I have created very selected pages which I find qualifying Wikipedia policies. If I find them trending in news but un-complying with the policies, I usually leave a redirect, or occasionally start with the draft. I believe not a single page that I created and/or majorly contributed has been deleted, and many respected editors and admins whom I had interacted with have always been helpful and supportive, believing in my good faith. Plus I only rewrite those articles in bad state which I find relevant, and not every other random article. However, due to recent attacks by sock puppetry over my edits, I want to be an autopatrolled user, so that I can easily continue volunteering independently here, and participate in the ongoing Destubathon as well. I promise I will not misuse this position. Thank you! M. Billoo 13:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)


    Confirmed

    [edit]

    Reason for requesting confirmed rights I have on my main accout Anti-pro-air (talk) 00:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

    @Anti-pro-air and Pro-anti-air: please confirm this from your main account too. stwalkerster (talk) 11:58, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
    Can confirm --pro-anti-air (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
     Done until the end of July on the assumption you'll have made enough edits by then to be autoconfirmed. stwalkerster (talk) 20:55, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
    There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.

    File mover

    [edit]
    There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.

    Page mover

    [edit]

    Mass message sender

    [edit]


    Pending changes reviewer

    [edit]

    I want to have this permission to reduce the pending changes backlog. I reviewed all the guidelines, such as BLP and the guideline for referencing. I revert good faiths and obvious vandalism and warn the user right after. Although I cannot perform a rollback to the recent changes page to have a consecutive track record due to my device's limited capabilities. I would rather choose pending changes over rollback; with rollback, I must have track records of mass rollback vandalism. But since I understood the guideline of rollback and pending changes, I can assure you that I will be responsible for having this permission. — ArćRèvtalk 10:38, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had an account for 29 days. MusikBot talk 10:40, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
    This user has been renamed to TheArcRev whilst this request was open. CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {CX}) 01:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

    I've made 200+ edits and created over 40 mainspace articles. I'm familiar with core content policies and would like to help review pending edits. Thank you! Wieditor25 (talk) 22:14, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has 99 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 22:20, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

    This is my third application. I believe that I have enough experience and that with the help of Twinkle, I could throw a "ROLLBACK" command and thwart the vandals. Thank you, Starfall2015 chat | about me 06:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

     Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1][2]). MusikBot talk 08:00, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    I would like to be able to review edits that others have made, so I can check for vandalism. Floating Orb (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)


    Rollback

    [edit]

    I'm re-requesting rollback to use tools that require this permission to more effectively combat vandalism. I believe I should have a high enough edit count. GalStar (talk) 03:58, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

     Done Malinaccier (talk) 15:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

    I was graciously referred here by Myrealnamm. My primary focus on Wikipedia is anti-vandalism work, so rollback would naturally be useful for me. I have read WP:ROLLBACK and feel like I have a good grasp on detecting good/bad faith edits. (I'd certainly hope so, if I got this far.) Thanks for your consideration. doozy (talkcontribs)⫸ 05:07, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

     Done Malinaccier (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

    Rollback appears useful for various reverts in specific instances when a serious vandal has made a rapid-fire succession of edits which need to be reverted. I enjoy using RedWarn, but rollback itself is handy here also for the AntiVandal tool I see. I have made around 70,000 edits and feel I qualify as a good candidate for this permission. Iljhgtn (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

     Done Malinaccier (talk) 15:55, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

    Requesting rollback rights to help me fight vandalism and use tools such as AntiVandal. --pro-anti-air (talk) 05:38, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

    Comment: AntiVandal looks really interesting, but you can also request to be on their whitelist from what I read. So you do not actually need to get the Rollback permission if all you want is to use Antivandal. Iljhgtn (talk) 13:45, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
     Done Malinaccier (talk) 16:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

    I have made almost 6,000 edits to Wikipedia and have been reverting vandalism for a few years using Twinkle and UltraViolet. I am familiar with the guidelines and processes of reverting and rollbackers would be helpful. SKAG123 (talk) 01:19, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

     Done Malinaccier (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

    I have over 500 mainspace edits without vanishing the articles. I am not the vanished user. I will not be blocked if I’m not vanishing the pages. In late 2023, I did revert a few articles that were vanished by the IPs. So, I will grant my Rollback right soon. Thomasfan1916 (talk) 04:31, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

    (Non-administrator comment) I guess this request will have to be marked  Request withdrawn. Feel free to revert if not appropriate. Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs 11:45, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
     Not done In addition to being blocked, this request demonstrates zero understanding of what Rollback is for. Malinaccier (talk) 16:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

    Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to support my anti-vandalism work.

    I have been actively patrolling recent changes and reviewing edits for potential vandalism, often using filters and tools like ORES. I’ve been reverting obvious vandalism manually and warning users where appropriate.

    I’m interested in increasing my efficiency with tools like Huggle and STiki, which require rollback rights. I understand the responsibilities of the rollback tool and will use it only for clear-cut vandalism or disruptive edits, not content disputes.

    Thank you for considering my request. Dahawk04 (talk) 17:40, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

     Done Malinaccier (talk) 16:17, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

    I will request my rollbacker rights, so I can use AntiVandal tool. I've most frequently used Twinkle on my Gadgets since I'm autoconfirmed. After they reverted my edits for not following WP:MOS guideline, as well as vandalism. Absolutiva (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

     Not done Rollback should not be used to revert editors who disagree with your application of manual of style edits. I recommend fighting vandalism without automated tools for some time (I did not see any examples of reverting vandalism and warning users in your last several thousand edits) and reviewing WP:ROLLBACKUSE to understand when rollback should and should not be used. Malinaccier (talk) 16:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

    I have experience in reverting vandalism with Twinkle and would like to access the Huggle tool to continue this work. Thank you. Magic Fizz (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

     Done Guerillero Parlez Moi 15:57, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

    I was trying to revert a vandalism edit, but the disruptive editor had done multiple, making it harder for me to revert it. It would have been helpful to have rollback rights so I could undo it fully and quickly. Floating Orb (talk) 20:11, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

     Not done You do not have enough experience reverting vandalism. In addition, I think you are still getting your bearings with editing in general and seem to be running into some issues. Given your current editing habits and experience, you are not ready for rollback yet. Malinaccier (talk) 02:14, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

    Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to more efficiently combat vandalism using advanced tools such as Huggle or AntiVandal. I'd like to believe that I always AGF when patrolling RC and I always leave an appropriate notice on users' talk page when reverting. Thank you for your time. Nubzor (T | C) 21:31, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

     Done Aoidh (talk) 06:30, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
    There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

    Template editor

    [edit]

    Footer

    [edit]

    Policies and links

      Today's afd

      Citation_templates

      Edit counter and analysis

      This user is a member of the

      Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists

      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD
      AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTAD

      Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet

      It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.

      This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.

      Committed identity: 5e0a9af339f30221a08fa86264cf1a81e3637ef17bd7ba87260c63b0fea3cdb0b55f545f061dd97184aa4061626c8c41b7237f4b18ccfdd096bff83e92ce9fc5 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

      I copied this source code from someone's user page I liked. I did not save the name. Thank you, whomever you are.