User talk:91.122.22.140

April 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paton Bridge. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:14, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Richard Yary, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 11:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please check OUN article. The transiliteratiin is rendered from it. Thank tou 91.122.22.140 (talk) 11:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peresyp. It seems that you are editing carelessly, not checking what you are doing. --Altenmann >talk 07:53, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Izno (talk) 18:22, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. 91.122.22.140 (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. Sarvagyana guru (talk) 10:35, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. 91.122.22.140 (talk) 10:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Omega group, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 17:33, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm PEPSI697. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Kursk front of the Russo-Ukrainian war have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 09:39, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Novenke, Sumy Oblast. PEPSI697 💬 | 📝 07:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This wikilink is wrong: the river is the namesake of the one referred to in the article. Please, revert 91.122.22.140 (talk) 07:31, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm GommehGaming101. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to National Guard of Ukraine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Gommeh _(T/C) 15:32, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 91.122.22.140 (talk) 15:34, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 16:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

AntiDionysius (talk) 11:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is 91.122.22.140. Mellk (talk) 18:09, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pinging, though after I posted my opinion there. Is it a due process? 91.122.22.140 (talk) 18:34, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for WP:RUSUKR violations, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 72 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

EvergreenFir (talk) 19:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EvergreenFir
Pinging you following my Unblock request. Would appreciate your earliest consideration. Thank you 91.122.22.140 (talk) 20:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes"). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Unblock request following the discussion with admins

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

91.122.22.140 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wrong application of WP:RUSUKR. Please copy my appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard or administrators' noticeboard. The application of policy as the violation is erroneous

Decline reason:

No. The error was clearly yours. Yamla (talk) 21:27, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The current date and time is 17 May 2025 T 19:58 UTC.@Yamla
Thank you for swift consideration of my request.
Posting the following to NK-Ukraine, and then to NK-Russia relations articles:
On 24 April 2025, according to Ukraine’s Air force, in the early hours of Thursday morning Russia launched 11 Iskander ballistic missiles, 37 KH-101 cruise missiles, six Iskander-K cruise missiles, 12 Kalibr cruise missiles, 4 KH-59/KH-69 missiles and 145 drones. ^[1] At least one of the Iskander-type missiles is claimed to be North Korean-manufactured KN-23 (Hwasong-11Ga), according to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. ^[2].
So, the edit to the latter article was posted into the subpara "Following Russo-Ukrainian war", which in this context clearly means time period. "Following" doesn't mean "caused by". Please reconsider the decision. Thank you 91.122.22.140 (talk) 20:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Gumenyuk, Nataliya (25 April 2025). "In Kyiv, we don't believe in the fantasy of Trump's 'peace deal'. Our reality is more dead civilians". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 April 2025.
^ Balforth, Tom (24 April 2025). "Missile that killed 12 in Russian strike on Kyiv was North Korean, Zelenskiy says" – via Reuters.

Putting aside the section heading, you're posting about allegations of supplying missiles used in the war. Are you seriously claiming this has nothing to do with the war? We don't have to even consider broadly construed to see that's ridiculous. And you claim this is only about bilateral relations but you're posting about Ukraine and Russia in the Russia-NK and Ukraine-NK articles. Nil Einne (talk) 20:56, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were made aware of WP:RUSUKR and subsequently made an edit in violation of it. That it also involves North Korea does not change that the edit was about the Russian-Ukraine war. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EvergreenFir
Notwithstanding my opinion in reply to @Nil Einne, apologies that an edit is understood as about the war. No more edits to those articles until the policy is lifted from me is assured. Thank you 91.122.22.140 (talk) 21:37, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As a by-side suggestion, probably both those articles might be made edit-restristed by Wikipedia to make it clear for everybody that they are within the scope of the war. To exclude ambiguity. Thank you 91.122.22.140 (talk) 22:03, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Nil Einne
1. My post is not an allegation, but a statement of facts as per WP:RS. 2. Your claim that the edit is about the war is very broadly construed, indeed: relations between countries are anarchic in its nature, and your view could be emotional, not rational: international actors in anarchic relations. 3. Yes, both articles are about bilateral relations. The reason I posted to NK-Russia one is because it was immediately after my edit was deleted from NK-Ukraine one by @Altenmann: with suggestion that it is about NK-Russia relations (considering his 21-year expertise, it was fair to follow a suggestion). But, if inappropriate, I would refrain frm posting to both those articles. 91.122.22.140 (talk) 21:33, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're missing the point. No one said the entirety of the bilateral relations article is about covered by the GS. So there is zero need to ECP both articles. However your edit was clearly about the war, it involved an allegation of supply of missiles used in the war in a section mentioning it came following the war. I'd argue that anything in that section should probably come under broadly construed but in any case the supply of missiles used in the war is not broadly construed. It will be covered even by a narrowly construed restriction. I don't know what Altenmann told you but it's your responsibility to follow any restrictions and no one else's. If someone gives you bad advice you should ignore it, just like if someone with a lot of experience told you to jump off a cliff. Plenty of experienced editors are unfamiliar with GS and CTOP ECR anyway, nor aware of the areas covered. It's not something experienced editors necessarily need to know since it doesn't affect their editing and 21 years means there wasn't even such a thing as EC when they started editing and they likewise passed the 500-30 threshold long before the restrictions existed. Indeed long before CTOP/DS/GS existed. Nil Einne (talk) 22:21, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BTW you might want to look up the word "claimed" in a dictionary give what you said in point 1. Nil Einne (talk) 01:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for elaborating. Just to make sure my understanding is right: shall the editing of the articles KN-23 and KN-24 considered about the war? If yes, one implicitly suggests that the claims of Ukraine and Reuters' recent investigation about the missiles supplies are merited. If no, the citation from Reuters' news cited in KN-23#History should be amended as well. Thank you. 91.122.22.140 (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Again it depends what you edit. If you just make general edits about them this might be okay. However anything about their use in the war will be covered. It doesn't matter whether it's allegations or accepted fact or myths or conspiracy theories or anything else, if it relates to the war then it's covered. You still seem to be making the mistake of thinking the restriction applies on an article level basis when it doesn't. While there are some articles which are so intrinsically tied with the war that the ECR applies to the whole article, there are way more where it only applies to certain parts. Note also an article could have nothing which would be covered currently however edits which relate to the war will still be covered. For example a biography about a Kiwi actor might have nothing covered but any attempts to add info on their comments about the war will be covered by the GS and is therefore forbidden without EC. To be clear the accuracy, sourcing etc of what is being added is irrelevant. Likewise even if I agree completely that the content belongs it's still inappropriate for someone without EC to add it and I'll tell them to stop and ask for a block if they continue. Nil Einne (talk) 07:36, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear anything in the sections "Usage during "Russian invasion of Ukraine" will be covered but also anywhere else where it concerns the missiles and the war. 07:40, 26 April 2025 (UTC) Nil Einne (talk) 07:40, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As soon as the block expired, you made this edit and several others to Draft:Kursk front of the Russo-Ukrainian war. Here you made an edit to an article about a Ukrainian military unit created during the war. You have also made edits to numerous other articles about military units. Mellk (talk) 06:18, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. I suppose "drafting" is not equal to "editing". Please elaborate. 2. Units "created during the war" are covered as well? Ok, noted. Thank you. 91.122.22.140 (talk) 08:41, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It covers all pages. Also, see WP:BROADLY. A unit that was created during the war and is participating in this war very much falls under this. I am not sure what is unclear about what WP:RUSUKR says: The restriction applies to all edits and pages related to the topic area, broadly construed. Mellk (talk) 08:45, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I'm PEPSI697. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Turka, Ukraine, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. PEPSI697 (💬) (📝) 07:08, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

City with a population of less than 10,000 inhabitants is a small one by definition. It could be considered subjective, of course, though administratively still a city within territorial division of Ukraine. 91.122.22.140 (talk) 07:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

[1] Gumenyuk, Nataliya (25 April 2025). "In Kyiv, we don't believe in the fantasy of Trump's 'peace deal'. Our reality is more dead civilians". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 April 2025.

[2] Balforth, Tom (24 April 2025). "Missile that killed 12 in Russian strike on Kyiv was North Korean, Zelenskiy says" – via Reuters.

[1]

[2]