User talk:WeWake

Last edit by User:WeWake (talk) . Please leave a message here to contact me. Also, to the keep the discussions united, further replies will continue on the same thread. Discussion may be closed when an action has been taken.

AI generated content

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Your recent creations of Tumor-informed minimal residual disease and Tumor-agnostic minimal residual disease seem to have AI generated content in them. I'm not making accusations here but would just appreciate if these could be cleaned up to fit the standards of Wikipedia. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 05:01, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi! No worries. I had reviewed WP:LLM before using any AI tools but somehow missed Wikipedia:LLMDISCLOSE. I should include that in my edits that utilize such assistance going forward. To answer your question, yes, I do use LLM for editing and cleaup, esp. with any kind of markup or formatting. However, content, references, style, sectioning and things to cover etc are all generally verified by me, expanded, cleaned up, and often heavily edited. It also is my understanding that use of LLM is not prohibited but per-se but with specific comptenence and careful judgement as long as general article guidelines and policies of Wikipedia are met. Let me know if my understanding is misplaced. Further, to take specific article as example, Tumor-agnostic minimal residual disease has all sources that exist and do contain the information for which they are used as citation support. Further, taMRD is also my area of research and the content seems appropriate for what the topic should convey. Do you have anything specific I could alter on that page? I understand that by asking for specific feedback, I am putting additional burden on you for something that's already volunteered time, but I imagine we both have same goal here. Cheers, thanks! Komodo (talk) 18:24, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

My main concern is the violations of the WP:MOS (such as capitalized words, bolded text etc) and WP:MEDMOS (use of the word patients for example). The wording itself is also a little odd in a way that I can't quite place. It almost seems like you are trying to sell me (the reader) on the concepts instead of giving me a balanced outline of the topic. Hopefully that helps. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 19:34, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment - yes, I noticed those when I reviewed the articles again after your beedback and have since then (a) rewrote a few sections (reducing wordiness, make writing style simpler), (b) fixed titling, (c) fixed and polished references, and (c) minimized use of bold/emphasis to select areas. Let me know if it reads better now? If so, please feel free to remove the tags. In the meantime, I'll continue to think (more) about revisions that balance the outline and make necessary edits. Komodo (talk) 19:51, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

I'd personally remove all the bolded text as it isn't needed (see MOS:BOLD). Additionally, while not required, it may be beneficial to rearrange the information into the format outlined at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles#Drugs, treatments, and devices as I believe this would give a more neutral and encyclopedic nature to the articles. There is still some violations of WP:MEDMOS and I think some of the bullet points could be changed to prose. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 02:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for quick reply. I reviewed the MOS:BOLD policy and it seemed fine with the usage I had on the page. In fact the MOS page itself was using bold type quite liberally, so prompted my current decision. However, I see your point and would continue to revise content that hopefully due to change from bullet to prose will eliminate the need of bold. Personally, I felt that bullets were aiding in clarity and understanding. Re: sectioning and titles, thanks for sharing the link. It makes sense and I'll work on reorganizing the content to make them consistent and resolve any WP:MEDMOS issues along with it. Do you feel ok removing the WP:LLM tag for now? Cheers Komodo (talk) 04:28, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

The MOS:BOLD page uses boldface more liberally because it is a manual page and not in mainspace. MOS:BOLD outlines when it is appropriate to use boldface: Boldface is often applied to the first occurrence of the article's title word or phrase in the lead, automatically applied boldface, redirects, Mathematical objects, and citation formats. and specifically says Avoid using boldface for emphasis in article text. I'm not comfortable removing the tags until the MOS stuff is cleaned up. IntentionallyDense ^(Contribs) 04:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for additional context and guidelines. I have revised the articles including boldface and aligned with MoS recommendations. Komodo (talk) 05:56, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Let me know if you have any further concerns that remain. I believe any WP:LLM issues have certainly been resolved as well as WP:MOS recommendations. In any case, if there are further issues to address, I hope we can replace the current tags with an appropriate and more specific tag so that future contributors can align their edits accordingly. Cheers Komodo (talk) 20:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA drive-by

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hi! I noticed that you nominated the article RNA-Seq for Good article status. You do not appear to have made significant edits to the article prior to this, and there is no discussion about nominating the article on its talk page. Current practice is that only editors who have significantly contributed to the article are able to nominate it (see the nomination instructions). I have consequently removed the nomination for now. Consider discussing whether the article is ready to be nominated with the article's principal editors on the talk page. Thank you. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 02:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for taking a look. I did some cleanup and the article looked quite complete to me. However, I do see the point on the discussion but I am not sure who the principal editors will be given this is a crowdsourced article or that they'll be even available to respond. However, I can try. Do you what happens if no "principal editor" is available to chime? Thanks! Komodo (talk) 04:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

If no editors who have already significantly contributed to the article are unavailable, then it is asked that you work on and improve it significantly so that you will be eligible to nominate it. I'm sure at least one of the top editors are still around however though. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 04:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Okay, that's good to know. For now, I'll not focus too much on what is significant amount (or for an article that feels complete, it may technically not even be possible), and instead try to find some original authors. I can raise a help topic if that fails. Also, I believe this article was rewritten and peer reviewed extensively as part of WikiJournal, so that contributes to my understanding of its "readiness" for a GA. Thanks again. Komodo (talk) 04:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Nomination of Giri Balasubramanium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giri Balasubramanium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giri Balasubramanium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WormEater13 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Vivek Rai. Thank you for your work on N1-Methylguanosine. Another editor, Mrfoogles, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I think it would be useful to add a little more of the uses to the lead. Going to give it a shot.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mrfoogles}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mrfoogles (talk) 22:21, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

@Mrfoogles: Thanks! Yes, sure, please go ahead. Cheers! Komodo (talk) 03:58, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
29		DNA oxidation (talk)	Add sources
116		Deamination (talk)	Add sources
110		Complementary DNA (talk)	Add sources
4		Government Polytechnic, Panaji (talk)	Add sources
12		Neuroepigenetics (talk)	Add sources
189		Computational science (talk)	Add sources
465		Transcription (biology) (talk)	Cleanup
53		Regulatory sequence (talk)	Cleanup
97		Transcriptional regulation (talk)	Cleanup
545		DNA sequencing (talk)	Expand
65		Third-generation sequencing (talk)	Expand
74		Pseudouridine (talk)	Expand
205		General-purpose computing on graphics processing units (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
16		Pipeline Pilot (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
9		Epigenetics of human development (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
75		Architectural terracotta (talk)	Merge
60		Antisemitism in Australia (talk)	Merge
5		Toneel (talk)	Merge
325		Utrecht University (talk)	Wikify
42		Bengal temple architecture (talk)	Wikify
8		G. Muniratnam (talk)	Wikify
5		Time-resolved RNA sequencing (talk)	Orphan
4		ScGET-seq (talk)	Orphan
2		Anil Roychoudhury (talk)	Orphan
266		Nimrit Kaur Ahluwalia (talk)	Stub
4		Methylation specific oligonucleotide microarray (talk)	Stub
22		7-Methylguanosine (talk)	Stub
6		Very short patch repair (talk)	Stub
11		METTL3 (talk)	Stub
24		APOBEC (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:59, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, Vivek Rai, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. You'll find some useful tips in our Ten Simple Rules. If you would like others to see your interest in the project, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:56, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

@Ipigott Thank you! I have several articles in progress and would remember to reach out if I need anything. Also, happy to help with anything else as well! Cheers! Komodo (talk) 18:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

@Ipigott It appears that I may need your assistance earlier than I expected. So following Women in Red goals for this month, I started a draft article here for a social activist and revolutionary historical figure of India: User:Vivek Rai/Bibhabati Bose. I have added everything that I could dig up and I feel generally quite good about it. But there are a few aspects that can use cleanup, and I hesitate to move to mainspace just yet and only to be AfDed. So I was wondering if you might have time for a quick glance and share any thoughts/feedback you may have on the draft! Thanks. Komodo (talk) 04:42, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

It looks as if it is coming along very well. I see you intend to add further citations. I don't think there will be any problems if you move it to mainspace.--Ipigott (talk) 08:13, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! In the spirit of being bold, the article is now live in mainspace at Bivabati Bose! ~~~ Komodo (talk) 18:57, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

• News and notes: India cut off from Wiki money; WMF annual plan and Wikimedia programs seek comment

• In the media: Feds aiming for WMF's nonprofit status

• Recent research: How readers use Wikipedia health content; Scholars generally happy with how their papers are cited on Wikipedia

• Arbitration report: Sysop Tinucherian removed and admonished by the ArbCom

• Discussion report: Latest news from Centralized discussions

• Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man

• Disinformation report: At WikiCredCon, Wikipedia editors and Internet Archive discuss threats to trust in media

• News from the WMF: Product & Tech Progress on the Annual Plan

• Humour: Crisis erupts as furious admins, functionaries complain about crappy t-shirts

• Comix: By territory

• In focus: Using AI on the Russian Wikipedia: opportunities or challenges?

• Community view: A deep dive into Wikimedia

• Debriefing: Barkeep49's RfB debriefing

• Gallery: Meet the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2024

• Obituary: JarrahTree, JohnClarknew and Yashthepunisher

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Vivek Rai. Thank you for your work on Tumor-informed minimal residual disease. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:20, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Vivek Rai. Thank you for your work on Tumor-agnostic minimal residual disease. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page for this emerging technique. There is significant overlap with Tumor-informed minimal residual disease, as many of the approaches are similar. However, as this is an growing field it's possible that they'll develop sufficiently to more clearly warrant separate discussions. I've linked it from ctDNA, and some further linking might be helpful too. Remember to be as specific as possible when adding categories.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 09:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Roseto effect on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi, I noticed that your username is Vivek Rai, but you sign as 'Komodo'. It took me a while to realise these are the same user, and I wouldn't be surprised if others are confused as well. Per WP:SIGPROB, please consider changing your signature to better reflect your name. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

DoubleGrazing—appreciate the heads up! My signature should be synced with my username now. Cheers — WeWake (talk) 08:49, 11 May 2025 (UTC)