Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:DYKNOM)
DYK queue status

There are currently 5 filled queues. Please consider promoting a prep to queue if you have the time!

DYK is running 12-hour sets.

To discuss the content or layout of the Template:Did you know page itself, go to Wikipedia talk:Did you know.
Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesTM:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}
Skip to top
Skip to bottom
For instructions on how to nominate an article, see Template:DYK nomination header § Instructions for nominators.
"Template:Did you know nominations" redirects here. For the list of approved nominations, see Template talk:Did you know/Approved.

This page is to nominate fresh articles to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page with a "hook" (an interesting fact). Nominations that have been approved are moved to a staging area and then promoted into the Queue. To update this page, purge it.

Count of DYK Hooks
Section # of Hooks # Verified
April 18 1
April 29 1
May 1
May 2 2
May 3
May 5 1
May 7 1
May 9 1
May 12 2
May 13 1
May 17 1
May 20 2
May 21 2
May 22 2
May 25 2 1
May 26 1
May 27 2 1
May 28 3
May 30 5 2
May 31 2 1
June 2 2 2
June 3 1 1
June 4 1 1
June 5 3 2
June 6 4 1
June 7 5 3
June 8 4 3
June 9 4 3
June 10 4 2
June 11 6 2
June 12 3
June 13 9 2
June 14 4 4
June 15 6 5
June 16 12 7
June 17 9 6
June 18 9 3
June 19 7 3
June 20 8 2
June 21 10 4
June 22 13 6
June 23 15 8
June 24 10 4
June 25 9 1
June 26 10 3
June 27 12 5
June 28 6 2
June 29 8 4
June 30 11 3
July 1 2
Total 239 97
Last updated 12:39, 1 July 2025 UTC
Current time is 12:43, 1 July 2025 UTC [refresh]

Instructions for nominators

[edit]
Shortcut

If this is your first nomination, please read the DYK rules before continuing. Further information can be found at the DYK guidelines.

Nominate an article

Frequently asked questions

[edit]

How do I write an interesting hook?

Successful hooks tend to have several traits. Most importantly, they share a surprising or intriguing fact. They give readers enough context to understand the hook, but leave enough out to make them want to learn more. They are written for a general audience who has no prior knowledge of or interest in the topic area. Lastly, they are concise, and do not attempt to cover multiple facts or present information about the subject beyond what's needed to understand the hook.

When will my nomination be reviewed?

This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until an editor reviews it. Since editors are encouraged to review the oldest submissions first, it may take several weeks until your submission is reviewed. In the meantime, please consider reviewing another submission (not your own) to help reduce the backlog (see instructions below). Because of WP:DYKTIMEOUT, a nomination should be reviewed within two months since the reviewer/promoter may agree to reject and close an unpromoted hook after that time has passed.

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the nomination you submitted to this nominations page, it may have been approved and is on the approved nominations page waiting to be promoted. It could also have been added to one of the prep areas, promoted from prep to a queue, or is on the main page.

If the nominated hook is in none of those places, then the nomination has probably been rejected. Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale. If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.


Instructions for reviewers

[edit]
Main page: Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide

Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article to which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the supplementary guidelines and the WP:Did you know/Reviewing guide.

To post a comment or review on a DYK nomination, follow the steps outlined below:

  • Look through this page, Template talk:Did you know, to find a nomination you would like to comment on.
  • Click the "Review or comment" link at the top of the nomination. You will be taken to the nomination subpage.
  • The top of the page includes a list of the DYK criteria. Check the article to ensure it meets all the relevant criteria.
  • To indicate the result of the review (i.e., whether the nomination passes, fails, or needs some minor changes), leave a signed comment on the page. Please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed; your comment should look something like the following:

    Article length and age are fine, no copyvio or plagiarism concerns, reliable sources are used. But the hook needs to be shortened.

    If you are the first person to comment on the nomination, there will be a line :* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :* --> showing you where you should put the comment.
  • Save the page.
  • After the nomination is approved, a bot will automatically list the nomination page on Template talk:Did you know/Approved.

If there is any problem or concern about a nomination, please consider notifying the nominator by placing {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page.

Advanced procedures

[edit]

How to promote an accepted hook

[edit]
At-a-glance instructions on how to promote an approved hook to a prep area
Check list for nomination review completeness
  1. Select a hook from the approved nominations page that has one of these ticks at the bottom post: .
  2. Check to make sure basic review requirements were completed.
    • Any outstanding issue following needs to be addressed before promoting.
  3. Check the article history for any substantive changes since it was nominated or reviewed.
  4. Images for the lead slot must be freely licensed. Fair-use images are not permitted. Images loaded on Commons that appear on the Main Page are automatically protected by KrinkleBot.
  5. Hook must be stated in both the article and source (which must be cited at the end of the article sentence where stated).
  6. Hook should make sense grammatically.
  7. Try to vary subject matters within each prep area.
  8. Try to select a funny, quirky or otherwise upbeat hook for the last or bottom hook in the set.
Steps to add a hook to prep
  • In one tab, open the nomination page of the hook you want to promote.
  • In a second tab, open the prep set you intend to add the hook to.

Wanna skip all this fuss? Install WP:PSHAW instead! Does most of the heavy lifting for ya :)

  1. For hooks held for specific dates, refer to "Local update times" section on DYK Queue.
    • Completed Prep area number sets will be promoted by an administrator to corresponding Queue number.
  2. Copy and paste the hook into a chosen slot.
    • Make sure there's a space between ... and that, and a ? at the end.
    • Check that there's a bold link to the article.
  3. If it's the lead (first) hook, paste the image where indicated at the top of the template.
  4. Copy and paste ALL the credit information (the {{DYKmake}} and {{DYKnom}} templates) at the bottom
  5. Check your work in the prep's Preview mode.
    • At the bottom under "Credits", to the right of each article should have the link "View nom subpage" ; if not, a subpage parameter will need to be added to the DYKmake.
  6. Save the Prep page.
Closing the DYK nomination page
  1. At the upper left
    • Change {{DYKsubpage to {{subst:DYKsubpage
    • Change |passed= to |passed=yes
  2. At the bottom
    • Just above the line containing

      }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

      insert a new, separate line containing one of the following:
      To [[TM:DYK/P1|Prep 1]]
      To [[TM:DYK/P2|Prep 2]]
      To [[TM:DYK/P3|Prep 3]]
      To [[TM:DYK/P4|Prep 4]]
      To [[TM:DYK/P5|Prep 5]]
      To [[TM:DYK/P6|Prep 6]]
      To [[TM:DYK/P7|Prep 7]]
    • Also paste the same thing into the edit summary.
  3. Check in Preview mode. Make sure everything is against a pale blue background (nothing outside) and there are no stray characters, like }}, at the top or bottom.
  4. Save.

For more information, please see T:TDYK#How to promote an accepted hook.

Handy copy sources:

  • To [[TM:DYK/P1|Prep 1]]
  • To [[TM:DYK/P2|Prep 2]]
  • To [[TM:DYK/P3|Prep 3]]
  • To [[TM:DYK/P4|Prep 4]]
  • To [[TM:DYK/P5|Prep 5]]
  • To [[TM:DYK/P6|Prep 6]]
  • To [[TM:DYK/P7|Prep 7]]

How to remove a rejected hook

[edit]
  • Open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to remove. (It's best to wait several days after a reviewer has rejected the hook, just in case someone contests or the article undergoes a large change.)
  • In the window where the DYK nomination subpage is open, replace the line {{DYKsubpage with {{subst:DYKsubpage, and replace |passed= with |passed=no. Then save the page. This has the effect of wrapping up the discussion on the DYK nomination subpage in a blue archive box and stating that the nomination was unsuccessful, as well as adding the nomination to a category for archival purposes.

How to remove a hook from the prep areas or queue

[edit]
  • Edit the prep area or queue where the hook is and remove the hook and the credits associated with it.
  • Go to the hook's nomination subpage (there should have been a link to it in the credits section).
    • View the edit history for that page
    • Go back to the last version before the edit where the hook was promoted, and revert to that version to make the nomination active again.
    • Add a new icon on the nomination subpage to cancel the previous tick and leave a comment after it explaining that the hook was removed from the prep area or queue, and why, so that later reviewers are aware of this issue.
  • Add a transclusion of the template back to this page so that reviewers can see it. It goes under the date that it was first created/expanded/listed as a GA. You may need to add back the day header for that date if it had been removed from this page.
  • If you removed the hook from a queue, it is best to either replace it with another hook from one of the prep areas, or to leave a message at WT:DYK asking someone else to do so.

How to move a nomination subpage to a new name

[edit]
  • Don't; it should not ever be necessary, and will break some links which will later need to be repaired. Even if you change the title of the article, you don't need to move the nomination page.

Nominations

[edit]

Older nominations

[edit]

Articles created/expanded on April 18

[edit]

Arthur Loveless

(
)
Created by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 115 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 00:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Pulled. There is no mention of a "Loveless Building" in the source, the building he retired to was called the "Studio Building". Also, the hook indicates he lived there before retiring there and the source doesn't say that, it says he managed the building in his retirement, at which time he also lived in it. Please fix the discrepancies, thanks, Gatoclass (talk) 12:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, maybe, but I can't confirm it from the provided sources. Gatoclass (talk) 09:57, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Generalissima: The nomination is already over two months old; I will be timing this out within 24 hours if the issues are not addressed. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gatoclass: Fixing ping due to a typo. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:37, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gatoclass: Ah, true. Here's the quote from Veith in case it's hard to access He traveled extensively and became an award-winning amateur photographer as well as a sophisticated collector of textiles and Chinese snuff bottles. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:41, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Veith, Thomas (2014). "Arthur L. Loveless". In Ochsner, Jeffery Karl (ed.). Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects (2nd ed.). University of Washington Press. pp. 180–185. ISBN 9780295806891.


Articles created/expanded on April 29

[edit]

Italian brainrot

(
)
An example of these surrealist creatures
An example of these surrealist creatures
  • Reviewed:
Created by Thegoofhere (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Thegoofhere (talk) 19:23, 3 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Not a review, but I'd like to point out some things for the benefit of the first-time nominator here. The article in question is linked in bold from the hook, which I've done. Thegoofhere, there is also a failed verification tag that will need addressing before the page is passed. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 22:58, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - ?
  • Interesting: No - ?
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: The article was created on 26 April, and was nominated for DYK on 3 May, which is a few hours after seven days. It is long enough with 5853 characters (896 words) of readable prose size. No copyright violations, plagiarism or close paraphrasing have been found in the article. The issue with this nomination is the provided hook, which in my opinion is not particularly interesting or intriguing, and its cited source at no point mentions this trend is particularly popular in Europe, just popular in general. Since the picture used is AI generated, it holds no copyright. It also looks good and clear at a 100px. A QPQ is not required for this nomination. I suggest the editor provides a new hook(s), if you need help or want suggestion for hooks, you can contact me in my talk page. NeoGaze (talk) 14:46, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thegoofhere: Hello, are you planning to continue with this nomination? NeoGaze (talk) 19:33, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
uh-huh --Thegoofhere (talk) 22:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Thegoofhere: You will need to propose a new hook if you want to continue pursuing this nomination. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:32, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2: ...that Tralalero Tralala is considered haram by Muslims? (https://screenshot-media.com/culture/internet-culture/italian-brainrot-dark-origin/)
ALT3 ...that Tung Tung Tung Sahur might become a flim? (https://www.kompas.com/hype/read/2025/05/12/104147466/viral-di-medsos-meme-tung-tung-tung-sahur-dikabarkan-akan-dibuatkan-film)
--🇺🇸Thegoofhere🇺🇸 (talk) 15:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@NeoGaze: @Narutolovehinata5:. --🇺🇸Thegoofhere🇺🇸 (talk) 15:30, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Thegoofhere: The content of ALT2 doesn't appear in the article, and its source doesn't specify Tralalero Tralala as being haram, but the whole Italian brainrot trend. It is also based on the opinion of a single tiktok user, which is no person of authority in the religion. ALT3 is problematic as well because its speculative. The film has not yet been completed, and so the proyect may come to nothing. I propose the following alts as alternatives, and if you approve them then we can proceed with these. NeoGaze (talk) 22:31, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT4 ...that several Italian Brainrot characters have been used to sell toys, NFTs and Meme coins? (Zhan, Jennifer (29 May 2025). "The Italian Brain Rot Ren-AI-ssance, Explained". Vulture. Retrieved 1 June 2025.) ("Meme coin trapralaleo tralala surges 17000%, experts caution investors on volatility". CHOSUNBIZ. 2025-04-29. Retrieved 2025-04-29.)
ALT5 ...that according to Polskie Radio, Italian Brainrot is popular among Generation Alpha "because it's stupid, funny and veeeery addictive"? ("Czym jest brainrot? Trippi Troppi i Ballerina Cappuccina - tego nie ogarniają nawet zetki". Polskie Radio. Polskieradio.pl. Archived from the original on 22 May 2025. Retrieved 3 June 2025.)
ALT6 ...that some Italian Brainrot characters have been accused of being Islamophobic? (Ferraris, Matilda (2025-04-26). "From Ballerina Cappuccina to Tralalero Tralalà, we unpack the darker undertones of Italian brainrot". SCREENSHOT Media. Retrieved 28 April 2025.)
@NeoGaze:. I approve. I suggest either ALT5 or ALT6--🇺🇸Thegoofhere🇺🇸 (talk) 19:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Great, then I'm going to cross out the previous alts and request a second opinion, to make sure everything is okay. NeoGaze (talk) 22:31, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@NeoGaze:. Hi! My opinion may not count much.... But I think ATL6 would be best suited as it does not include an "according to...".Earth605 (talk) 15:29, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination is already over two months old and has not been approved or promoted, so marking this for closure per WP:DYKTIMEOUT. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:39, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: I have approved it (I added the template to make it more clear), I just requested a second opninion since this is my second review. @Earth605: Attribution is not really an issue as long as it is properly done with reliable sources, its up to the person that promotes the hook. NeoGaze (talk) 11:36, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, DYKTIMEOUT also applies to nominations which have been approved but have not been promoted. I will let a promoter decided whether or not to promote or close the nomination. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:41, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 1

[edit]

Articles created/expanded on May 2

[edit]

James Bunbury White

(
)
Created by Aneirinn (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

Aneirinn (talk) 17:47, 6 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The hook says, he was the founder of Whitesville, but the lead speaks of Whiteville. - A typo? Munfarid1 (talk) 13:58, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The hook said Whitesville because Whiteville was originally established as Whitesville, however, the hook has now been changed to say Whiteville. Aneirinn (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clearing this up. Now the review is . Munfarid1 (talk) 17:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aneirinn and Munfarid1: This comes nowhere close to meeting WP:DYKINT unless there's something I've missed; a new hook is needed. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aneirinn and Munfarid1: Please address the above.--Launchballer 18:14, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0: ... that the memorial for James Bunbury White, the founder of Whiteville, North Carolina, was knocked down in a car crash 200 years after his death?
ALT1: ... that the memorial in honor of James Bunbury White, the founder of Whiteville, North Carolina, and the first North Carolina Senator from Columbus County, was knocked down in a car crash 200 years after his death?
Your new ALT0 seems better to me than ALT1, as it is shorter and more precise. But which source does this refer to? Munfarid1 (talk) 08:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Added now. Aneirinn (talk) 14:14, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

100 men versus a gorilla

(
)
Created by Thegoofhere (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Thegoofhere (talk) 19:12, 4 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • DYK is not for any random fact—it's to direct readers to relatively new articles on Wikipedia. Your hook needs to contain a link to an article that is new enough to be eligible for the "Did you know" section. See WP:DYKNEW for the eligibility requirements. Mz7 (talk) 21:53, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: ALT2 is the only hook approved. ALT0 takes it a bit farther than the article (pretty much all statements on who wins in the article are attributed to some expert), and ALT1 doesn't really appear in the article (no info about public opinion overall). I'm not really sure where the concern for notability comes from: this is pretty far from WP:ROUTINE, and it's got plenty of secondary sources. Despite the orange tag at time of writing, all sources look fine. New reviewer. Based5290 :3 (talk) 04:06, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Thegoofhere: ALT2 won't fly either; you've got one opinion in wikivoice. New hook needed.--Launchballer 00:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If none of the hooks will fly, this shouldn't be on the Approved page. Marking that there's an issue, and moving the nomination back to the Nominations page. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thought that the quotes would've made it clear enough that it wasn't in wikivoice, sorry about that. ALT3: ... that according to a Zoo Miami staff member, to defeat a gorilla, 100 men may "envelop the gorilla and create a human straightjacket"? Based5290 :3 (talk) 09:22, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer needed for ALT3. @Thegoofhere: Any other hooks you would like to propose? Z1720 (talk) 15:07, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ALT4: ... that according to commentators, Jake Paul should fight a gorilla once it's retired? (Everything Goes Wrong as Jake Paul’s Attempt to Settle Gorilla Fight Debate Sends Internet Into Frenzy)
ALT5: ...that the White House stated Donald Trump can beat 142,000 illegal immigrants? (White House joins '100 men vs. gorilla' trend with Trump's immigration record: '142K illegal immigrants vs. Trump')
IDK where I should put the article link in ALT5. --🇺🇸Thegoofhere🇺🇸 (talk) 17:29, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Z1720: --🇺🇸Thegoofhere🇺🇸 (talk) 19:52, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on May 3

[edit]

Articles created/expanded on May 5

[edit]

Meg White

(
)
Meg White in 2006
Meg White in 2006
  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Watagwaan (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Watagwaan (talk) 00:19, 6 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Aneirinn (talk) 17:37, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I feel like this hook doesn't meet WP:DYKINT – essentially all this says is "a drummer started drumming on a day" DimensionalFusion (talk · she/her) 07:14, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT1 ... while Meg White's drumming initially drew mixed reactions, it earned retrospective praise and she is considered a key figure in the garage rock revival of the 2000s?
That better @DimensionalFusion? TarnishedPathtalk 11:44, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 needs a review. I agree that ALT0 is not interesting. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:41, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if this would meet DYKBLP, but would a hook revolving about her not making a public appearance since 2009 also be a possible option? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:32, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It probably would, but I'd probably promote ALT1a: ... that Meg White (pictured) is considered a key figure in the 2000s garage rock revival? This still needs a review though.--Launchballer 22:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on May 7

[edit]

Star Trek: Day of Blood

(
)
Moved to mainspace by Cambalachero (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 128 past nominations.

Cambalachero (talk) 14:31, 7 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Cambalachero All sources that I can find verify the hook fact. The reading order section needs to be referenced. I am not approving ALT1 as not interesting. SL93 (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at the article right now and nothing stands out as a hook that works for non-Trekkies. If no agreement on a new hook can be made, or no new hook can be proposed, we may have to fail this one unfortunately. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:51, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I thought so also. SL93 (talk) 21:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know. Is the hook really all that interesting if you aren't a Trekkie? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:24, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Narutolovehinata5 Is Template:Did you know nominations/The Interstellar Song Contest any different? It is in prep 6. SL93 (talk) 13:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's a different case. For one, that hook makes sense even if someone isn't a fan of Star Trek. A character going that long between appearances is at least going to raise eyebrows among an average reader. ALT0 seems to be appealing more to Trekkies: I'm not sure if a non-Trekkie would be as interested in knowing about crossovers or things like that. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:46, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Crossovers are a type of comic book publication, usually used by Marvel Comics and DC Comics. You can expect them to "raise an eyebrow" Spock-style when they notice that someone else is stealing their thunder. And, as said, first work of its kind. Cambalachero (talk) 23:44, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SL93:, remember to finish the review. As I pointed some time ago, the "Reading order" has been referenced. Please mark it as ready if ready, or point if there is something else that still needs to be done. Cambalachero (talk) 16:52, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's ready. I was waiting for the hook thing to be straightened out, which it didn't. SL93 (talk) 17:01, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, I still don't think it's all that interesting to anyone who isn't a fan of Star Trek. It's very interesting to Star Trek fans, definitely, but if you're not a fan of the series, then having a crossover event within that series does not seem like much of a big deal. If it was a crossover between, say, Star Wars or Star Trek, it would be a different story. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:32, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm tired of Naturo's constant attempts to derail this nomination with non-actionable complaining. I would like someone else to provide a 4° opinion on this, or to endorse SL93's review. Cambalachero (talk) 18:55, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, if a hook is at best marginally interesting, it is actionable by proposing a different hook (for what it's worth, I agree with SL93 that ALT1 is not interesting, so it doesn't count). If there really is nothing else in the article, I could maybe live with ALT0. I personally just don't think that the hook has much appeal outside of non-Star Trek fans, which isn't exactly the kind of broad audience that DYK is looking for in hooks. It would be like having a hook about having a Pokémon crossover between two different generations: if you're into Pokémon, you'll find it interesting, but less so if you aren't into Pokémon. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 21:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per the request for a new reviewer, pinging uninvolved editors Launchballer, AirshipJungleman29, and RoySmith regarding the interestingness of ALT0. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:23, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To the nominator: pinging editors only counts as canvassing if they were pinged to lead a discussion towards a desired outcome. In this particular case, I pinged the three editors as they are active on WT:DYK and they are knowledgeable about hook interest. I do not know about their opinions at all regarding ALT0, and I do not know if they will approve or disapprove it. I pinged them for their expertise, and not because I think they have a specific viewpoint. Also, my message was neutrally worded rather than being an explicit request to reject or approve. Of course, these editors are free to not respond, and a different editor can make the final decision here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I find ALT0 marginally interesting; our article describes Star Trek as "one of the most recognizable and highest-grossing media franchises of all time" and its article has averaged ~3500 views per day. However, given the above, I recommend posting at WT:DYK.--Launchballer 14:20, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've posted a request for a second opinion at WT:DYK. If my earlier pings are considered canvassing then I apologize, as it was not my intention. I do suggest that Cambalachero assume good faith, as any impression of canvassing was entirely unintentional per my explanation above. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:24, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do not. A user acting in good faith would have stepped aside and stayed silent when someone says that his opinions are not productive and asks for another user to take part in the discussion specifically because of it. A user acting in good faith would not ping specific editors of his own choosing who did not take part in the discussion or the writing of the article to replace him at the discussion (circumstances force me now to suspect that Launchballer, AirshipJungleman29, and RoySmith may be friends of yours), specially when the neutral procedure (the third opinion icon) was already implemented and awaiting for results. A user acting in good faith would not remove a {{Canvass warning}} that was placed in reference to his own actions. I will politely ask you to get lost, and let me discuss with someone else other than you or your friends. Cambalachero (talk) 16:42, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, I don't think there's any conspiracy or cabal at work. Narutolovehinata5 tends to be a nudge, but that kind of attitude is needed to move things along. I don't see anything wrong except for the use of "first", which we are trying to avoid. Viriditas (talk) 23:01, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I will not be commenting on this nomination further, but I am disappointed at the lack of good faith shown in the above comment. As I said in my explanation, I had pinged those editors specifically because I did not know what they would think about the hook and knew, from their scrutiny of hooks on DYK, that they would be objective and unbiased (being objective means they could approve the hook and disagree with my opinion). Characterizing them as my "friends", when I explained my intentions, is not assuming good faith. I also apologized for my actions and made a neutral message at WT:DYK not targeted at any specific editor. I am fine with not participating here further, I am just very disappointed at the attitude shown to me above. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 9

[edit]

Pilot (Arrested Development)

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by Crystal Drawers (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Crystal Drawers (talk) 02:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

@Crystal Drawers and Soman: per discussion at WT:DYK, I've pulled this one out of queue because of unresolved sourcing questions. I'll come back around in a bit to summarize where my thoughts are :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 18:55, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Crystal Drawers: Thanks for waiting, and sorry for a long message in advance! So, you mentioned this draft of a possible addition to the Manual of Style – I would say that even if it were part of the MoS, it still wouldn't supersede the basic principles of what goes into an article. Neither does the fact that some or even many other articles aren't written to the same standards – lots of articles were written at a time when standards were lower or in a topic area where enforcement of policy is less rigorous, but that doesn't mean that policy shouldn't be enforced rigorously.

As to what discourages using DVD extras: I would argue that a core principle on Wikipedia is that our coverage of a topic is shaped by independent, professional sources. They're the people we trust to separate what's important and true from what isn't, and overusing self-published material gets in the way of that ideal. The guideline I'll cite here is WP:SELFSOURCE, which says that people can be reliable sources of information about themselves as long as the source does not involve claims about third parties; it also says that use of self-sourced material should be minimal; the great majority of any article must be drawn from independent sources. I do see some self-published sources being used for claims about third parties, and I wouldn't say that the use of non-independent sources in the article is minimal.

I do think that correcting the first one would go a long way towards addressing the second, so I hope I'm not pushing too much of a burden on you! Please let me know if there's anything I can do to help :) also, I kinda wanna get around to watching this show now. it's been on my list forever...theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 06:42, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Theleekycauldron: What makes citing DVD extras different to citing the episode itself, which is allowed per WP:PLOTSOURCE?--Launchballer 21:22, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: I'd say that plot is different from real-world information. PLOTSOURCE is a specific carveout from our general policy of prioritizing secondary and independent sources, in recognition of the fact that the plot of a work is self-contained and easily accessible, so all we have to do is summarize the information the same way we would any other source. If we required a professional org to do that work first, we just wouldn't have plot sections in most book articles (even though I do like secondarily-sourced plot summaries where available). Still – we wouldn't, for example, cite a DVD extra for interpretation of the work. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 22:00, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In which case, @Crystal Drawers: please address the above.--Launchballer 22:31, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Theleekycauldron: @Launchballer:, I apologize for my lateness, I have a lot of testing this week so I have been studying instead of doing my usual Wikipedia editing. I will have it done by the end of the weekend Crystal Drawers (talk) 02:14, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No rush, Crystal Drawers, best of luck on your tests!! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Crystal Drawers: Just following up on the above. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I again apologize. My finals finish on Wednesday and I will be back to my usual Wikipedia workings by then, so expect this to be finished by the end of the week Crystal Drawers (talk) 01:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Irwin, William (November 8, 2011). Arrested Development and Philosophy: They've Made a Huge Mistake. Wiley. ISBN 9781118146262.

Articles created/expanded on May 12

[edit]

Big Stone County Museum

(
)
District No. 13 School
District No. 13 School
Created by Myotus (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 56 past nominations.

paul2520 💬 00:47, 13 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Interesting museum, on fine sources, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed and illustrates the hook perfectly. In the article:
    1. link to the town in the first sentence
    2. for me, you could use ref 2 just once after "including", instead of having it in every line of the list.
    3. You may want to use mode=packed in the gallery to show the pics better.
    4. Next time please make section headers in sentence case - I did it for 2 here.
    Thank you for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comment and suggestions, I have made the changes. Myotus (talk) 21:24, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
One more hook question: isn't it "a historic"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:58, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerda Arendt: thanks for the feedback & edits. Apologies for the accidental rollback—it was a slip.
Technically 'a historic' is fine, so either way. = paul2520 💬 00:36, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore Rail Test Centre

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by ZKang123 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 17 past nominations.

ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 15:28, 10 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Allow me then to suggest a few more alts that aren't as contentious.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 11:43, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I see both hooks as problematic. ALT2 seems too technical or specialist, and ALT3 as currently written reads like an advertisement. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:42, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: What about a simplified ALT2? Like ALT4: ...that the tracks of the Singapore Rail Test Centre are designed to work with different signalling systems and can run on both direct current and alternating current power? ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 01:03, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Seems too complex. Maybe split it into separate hooks? It has two main hook facts when individually either work as hooks. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:36, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then:

Is that better? ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 05:25, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that works better. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 08:05, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ZKang123: Sorry, but I don't find either part of ALT4 interesting; products are always going to have specifications.--Launchballer 16:47, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Hmm... what about: ALT5: ...that the Singapore Rail Test Centre was built on a country club originally acquired for the Kuala Lumpur–Singapore High Speed Rail? Thanks for looking into this, btw. ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 00:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What about ALT6: ... that part of Singapore Rail Test Centre was built on a reservoir?--Launchballer 08:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I still think ALT5 is a bit more interesting because it concerns a major cancelled project. And well, technically only a viaduct crosses the reservoir.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 10:13, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well yes, hence 'part of'. The thing with ALT5 is that most mainpage readers would not know that the Kuala Lumpur line was a major cancelled project.--Launchballer 13:26, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then I go with your suggestion.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 13:28, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I must ask for another reviewer as I can't approve my own hook.--Launchballer 14:08, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewing ALT6 per Launchballer's comment. ALT6 is cited inline, meets DYKINT, and is verified in the source. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm ready to approve the nomination, but just to make sure: @RoySmith: Have the sourcing issues you raised been solved? I took a quick look at the article, and it doesn't seem problematic to me anymore. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:51, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the ping, but I'm going to leave that decision to somebody less involved than me. RoySmith (talk) 14:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@RoySmith: You were the one who raised concerns about the sourcing, and thus why the hook was pulled, so it's your call if your concerns have been addressed or not. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:22, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't imagine you'll like my answer, but if you insist... I put a lot of effort into reviewing this the first time (and in more detail at FAC) and rejected it. That should have been the end of it. I think it is unfair to expect that I'll put that much effort again into a new review. I also don't think this should have passed GA but I don't have the energy to fight that battle. DYK needs to stop devoting so much energy to trying to rescue sub-standard nominations. RoySmith (talk) 14:35, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If that were the case the DYK nomination for the North Korean destroyer Choe Hyon should not have been greenlitted given arguably, South Korean sources would merely copy North Korean claims of the ship, if you believe the article still has sourcing issues as such.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 17:54, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Starship.paint: The ping is only to see if the sourcing concerns raised in the FAC have been resolved, not for an opinion regarding the hooks. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Narutolovehinata5. I'll take a look soon. starship.paint (talk / cont) 01:28, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: - in my opinion the current sources are acceptable for DYK standard, as has been from the conclusion of my GA review. Your mileage may vary. starship.paint (talk / cont) 01:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have to enquire @Narutolovehinata5:, why are we also basing the source quality on FAC standards than GA standards? From my understanding, the GA stage only requires reliable sources to be used, while the main criticisms of sourcing on the FAC were more based on their quality.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 01:40, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not even sure why the sourcing was even questioned in the first place, it looked just fine to me. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:21, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any concerns here. The facility is notable and the sources were OK for statements of basic fact. My concerns in the FAC were around NPOV issues which aren't relevant to either of the proposed hooks. Nick-D (talk) 10:44, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll just give this the tick since I don't really see what was wrong with the sourcing. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:14, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think the fact is currently in the article, but it can be found in this source. Gatoclass (talk) 09:53, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I added the fact into the article.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 11:14, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 13

[edit]

Georgian Philharmonic Orchestra

(
)
Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 2144 past nominations.

Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:57, 20 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • I would personally trim the hook to just this:
ALT0a ... that in 2022, the Georgian Philharmonic Orchestra performed a solidarity concert with Ukraine featuring music by Ukrainian and Georgian composers?
I think there is some potential in the original hook fact, it's just worded awkwardly and I don't think the founding date is important to the main hook fact. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:11, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think a centenary is worth mentioning. I also would like to point at how immediately after the invasion that was - perhaps you have an idea. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The primary hook fact is that they performed a solidarity concert following the invasion of Ukraine. Them being founded in 1925 is irrelevant to that. Again, WP:DYKTRIM applies: ...don't be afraid to trim hooks of extraneous information and clauses... In general, the shorter and punchier the hook, the more impact it has. If your desire is for the hook to run on the orchestra's centennial year, just it being approved and running is all that's needed. No need to mention the year since it's irrelevant to the hook fact. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:24, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0b ... that following Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the Georgian Philharmonic Orchestra performed a solidarity concert featuring music by Ukrainian and Georgian composers?
I think that our readers, who are expected not to know this orchestra even existed, get valuable extra information by telling them (in a short phrase) about the groups's long history, - a background giving the fact more depth. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:22, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0c: ... that the Georgian Philharmonic Orchestra, founded in 1925, gave a solidarity concert with Ukraine soon after the Russian invasion? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:24, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: I'm happy with ALT0c on an interestingness level. Do you plan on giving this a full review?--Launchballer 11:46, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: I was not planning on giving this a full review. However, I don't think we should go with ALT0c as written because I still feel that the year is trimmable. I am open to a variant of ALT0c that omits the year, as I really don't think that the foundation year is an essential part of the main hook fact. So basically something like: ALT0d: ... that the Georgian Philharmonic Orchestra gave a solidarity concert with Ukraine soon after the Russian invasion? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:11, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think the centenary adds interest, but don't feel strongly enough either way. I'll let a reviewer adjudicate.--Launchballer 12:15, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
One issue is that it might be easy to miss the centenary point, so even if that was the reason for including the year, it might take a while for the reader to register if (if they register it at all). It's also probably less relevant to the hook fact because the concert was in 2022 and not in 2025, so the year really isn't really relevant at all. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Even if you "miss" the centenary point, you can see that there is a long history (to be explored when you click), vs. just some short-time action. We have different readers, and some may be interested in history and perspective. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:44, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Long enough, new enough. QPQs are done and Earwig is clean. I'm fine with ALT0c from an interest standpoint (though it might flow better if 'the' was replaced with 'a' and the commas were removed), but it's cited to AllEvents.in, which sold tickets for the event, and I think this would deserve {{independent source inline}}.--Launchballer 01:54, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I translated that. There is no doubt that it happened. - They also played in another one on 11 April. - I can't easily find things in Georgian, - help? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:17, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 17

[edit]

Cady Noland

(
)
  • ... that the artist Cady Noland was sued by two different collectors of her work after she "disavowed" artworks that she no longer considered genuine because they were damaged or altered?
  • Source: Julia Halperin (Oct 4, 2024), “Just How Much Control Can an Artist Have Over Their Work?”, T Mag (New York Times Style Magazine): “The Swiss art dealer Marc Jancou sued Noland and Sotheby’s after the artist disavowed a work that he wanted to sell at auction. […] Noland visited Sotheby’s to view it, along with two other works destined for the block that season, and found its corners so damaged that she considered the work totaled. Sotheby’s called off the sale. [...] But it was hardly the last time that Noland would defend her art’s honor. There was a series of lawsuits over ‘Log Cabin Facade’ (1990), a life-size wooden sculpture that the artist disavowed after its previous owner allowed it to be installed outdoors for over 10 years and then replaced the rotted wood with new logs. ‘This is not an artwork,’ she said in a handwritten fax addressed to its new owner, the Ohio-based collector Scott Mueller”
  • ALT 1 (added after discussion below): ... that the artist Cady Noland has "disavowed" several artworks that she no longer considered genuine because they were damaged or altered?
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: First ever DYK nom, please advise if I mis-formatted anything. Thanks!
Improved to Good Article status by 19h00s (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

19h00s (talk) 20:37, 17 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Ok, makes sense on the negativity front. I'd disagree on the image front, as detailed in the article and discussions on the talk page (long story short: she doesn't allow images of herself to be created or circulate, this image where she hides her identity has been widely discussed and is discussed in the article). Don't necessarily disagree on the breaking up of the sections, but a biography article necessarily requires a more cogent narrative structure that is extremely difficult to achieve when you spread everything out into sections that break up the chronological flow. Happy to retract this nomination or you can just fail it. 19h00s (talk) 20:34, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A nomination doesn't fail just because one hook doesn't work. You could probably get away with ALT0a: ... that Cady Noland "disavowed" some of her artworks?, though I'll let a reviewer adjudicate on that.--Launchballer 20:47, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Learn something new about Wiki processes every day lol, just assumed this was DOA if the hook was out of bounds as written. Just added an alt version. Thanks for the tips. 19h00s (talk) 22:23, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your extensive work on this article, 19h00s. You nominated the day it passed its GA review, so it counts as a new GA. Brevity is certainly not an issue. The sourcing seems impeccable and I see no obvious neutrality issues. I do agree with Launchballer that the sections desperately need subsections; section with up to 16 paragraphs, some of them very long, are difficult to navigate. This is not a DYK requirement by any means. I am not convinced that the non-free infobox photo is fair use because the subject is a living person. There are five more non-free images in the article. I am not sure whether this is a DYK concern, but it might be a GAN concern, on the basis of which this hook is nominated. I hope I can get some input from @DYK admins: . Surtsicna (talk) 09:32, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Since there's questions about the GA review, pinging Floating Orb who conducted the GA review. RoySmith (talk) 10:17, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks y'all for taking a look at this nom. First, on the image front - I welcome more thoughts on this picture, but I've been through several rounds of discussion on this and multiple admins have concluded the image is OK as used given the circumstances (she doesn't allow pictures, this image is widely discussed as an example of that, it's discussed in the article). But obviously defer to community consensus. On the GA process, I would love for a new, full GA review. I asked several times during the process for others to step in and take over from Floating Orb, but other editors were really intent on letting FO learn the GA process (at the expense of this review). If you look at the full edit history on the review it's really hard to follow. But experienced GAR editors seemed to think it was fine by the end.19h00s (talk) 10:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on May 20

[edit]

William Salter II, James White (North Carolina politician, died c. 1789)

( Comment or view )
Created by Aneirinn (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. Nominator has 8 past nominations.

Aneirinn (talk) 23:41, 20 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I definitely prefer ALT3, as it makes readers want to find out, how she spied. The first two don't seem very interesting to me, as they mention rather mundane facts. Munfarid1 (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have a strong opinion about White, but I just looked at Salter's article and unfortunately there isn't anything that stands out as hook that is specifically about him. The hookiest part was about his wife. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aneirinn: Given the above, would you be fine with withdrawing your nomination of Salter in favor of just focusing on White? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:28, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Broadway Jones (performer)

(
)
  • Source: *Badger, Reid (1995). A Life in Ragtime: A Biography of James Reese Europe. Oxford University Press. p. 307. ISBN 9780195345209. Henry 'Broadway' Jones was active in vaudeville and musical theater into the 1930s. In fact, Jerome Kern and Oscar Hammerstein wrote "Ol' Man River" with Jones in mind.
  • Carter, Lawrence T. (1979). Eubie Blake: Keys of Memory. Balamp Publishing Co. p. 62. ISBN 9780913642108. Later Jerome Kern went down to Florida. He heard a lot of black singers, and he decided to write the musical Show Boat. And having heard Broadway [Jones] sing, he wrote the song " Old Man River " expressly for his voice.
Created by 4meter4 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 113 past nominations.

4meter4 (talk) 20:53, 21 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new and long enough (created May 20), NPOV, has an interesting hook. One QPQ is done, but one additional is needed due to backlog mode being active. Article is inline and reliably sourced to a book from Oxford University Press. No image. Earwig shows 3.8% (violation unlikely). Chetsford (talk) 19:14, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Chetsford I added my second QPQ above. Best.4meter4 (talk) 00:48, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go! Chetsford (talk) 04:20, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@4meter4 and Chetsford: I have pulled this per WT:DYK. I note 4meter4's comment that "Ol' Man River" is often cited as the beginning of the modern musical and I suggest adding a source to that effect (for example, that "a song often cited as the beginning of the modern musical" was written..."); otherwise, this needs a new hook.--Launchballer 14:52, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer That is not what I said. Show Boat as a whole is cited as the beginning of the modern musical. "Ol' Man River" is the best known song from that show. There are many sources for that, but if you look at the Musical theatre article Show Boat is the only work to get its own subsection. Best.4meter4 (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my mistake. I suggest "that the best known song from a musical often cited...".--Launchballer 15:07, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The hook isn’t about Ol Man River but about Broadway Jones. The point was that this very famous song was written for his voice. It’s the most interesting thing about him in my opinion.4meter4 (talk) 15:10, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I won’t have internet access this week as I am traveling to a remote area with no cell phone reception or internet. It may be a while before I can think up something new. I will say I am a bit dismayed by the outcome here as I don’t think the song is obscure. There aren’t very many songs that have entire books written about them, and this is one of them.4meter4 (talk) 15:17, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"I am a bit dismayed by the outcome here as I don’t think the song is obscure." I share your perplexity. Chetsford (talk) 15:51, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think this misses the actually interesting part of the story. Lots of songs are written with particular performers in mind, but to have a song in a musical written especially for you yet turn down the part seems much more intriguing. I suggest something like "...despite the song Ol Man River from the musical Showboat having been written with him in mind, Broadway Jones did not join the cast?" --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 18:37, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
While that seems like a fine hook, the source only says he didn't join the original cast. Unless I'm missing something, we would need a source that established he didn't join the touring cast or any revival casts as well. I suppose we could modify it by saying "join the original cast" but that gets a little clunky. Chetsford (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Launchballer pulled this per a WT:DYK discussion. @Chetsford: How does this ALT hook sound?
ALT1 ... that singer Broadway Jones got his nickname from always wearing sharp looking suits?
Note that 4meter4 will be away for a week per their comment at the WT:DYK discussion. Narutolovehinata5 (talk ·contributions) 00:14, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It seems less interesting than the original one. Ol Man River is probably the most iconic song in the Great American Songbook while Broadway Jones is (I think - at least to me) relatively unknown in 2025 unless one is immersed in the history of vaudeville. But I guess it's better than nothing. Chetsford (talk) 04:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how that even makes sense. What's the connection?----User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 11:39, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Probably from the culture of the New York theatre district at that time being connected so closely to fashion.4meter4 (talk) 23:31, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Seems more like a nonsequiter than something interesting. The only reason that would get me to click is to find out what it was supposed to be saying. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 15:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would assume that if he had later joined the cast, the source would have said so. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 17:08, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I don't understand the attachment to the original hook, because even with all that context, those accolades do not matter if the reader or audience is not familiar with the song. I'd be open to a variant of ALT0 that mentions it being on the list, but I don't think vanilla ALT0 works even with the context. One rule of thumb for hooks I have is, "If a hook requires an explanation on the nomination page, it usually does not meet DYKINT." Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:28, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
But the hook doesn’t require explanation. I think the point is that your lack of familiarity is not an accurate predictor of the general public’s familiarity in this case. This is a very famous song that a large percentage of readers on the English wiki will know. The accolades indicate fame and are a better predictor of that criteria than any individual wikipedian. Extrapolating your own lack of knowledge out to a wider audience is not a good way to operate in cases where there is evidence of wide fame/recognition on a given topic. At some point we all have to acknowledge that there are elements of popular culture / common knowledge that for whatever reason we as individuals may have missed but the general public overall has not. Applying specialized knowledge onto a well known topic isn’t a good idea.4meter4 (talk) 22:57, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on May 21

[edit]

Yao Yuanjun

(
)
  • ... that after Chinese Border Defense Police officer Yao Yuanjun was killed in action, his police dog continued to wait for him to return?
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: Several comments:

1. Since the subject was in the Border Defense corps, which is part of the Ministry of Public Security Active Service Forces, I'm kinda unsure what to refer to him as, since MPSASF personnel were active service members. 2. I currently also have an approved nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Wang Xiaolong (Chinese coast guardsman), may I ask if this would interfere with anything 3. The 2 photos are non free fair use, so it cannot be put on the main page.

Created by Thehistorianisaac (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Thehistorianisaac (talk) 15:54, 21 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi Thehistorianisaac, welcome to DYK. I have formatted the original hook and removed the repeated hooks. Regarding your questions:

1. "border police officer" may be sufficient for the hook in line with the lead of the article. 2. No, you have multiple DYK nominations running in parallel. 3. Non-free images cannot be used in DYK.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - The reference is in Chinese. From Google translate, it seems that news agencies are saying as per the viral video, the dog is waiting for his master even after 10 years; rather than an independently verified fact that the dog is waiting. The article and the hook needs to be reworded. If my understanding is incorrect, please clarify.
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: None required.

Overall: The article is currently at AfD. We will have to wait for the same to conclude, before approving the hook. Most of the references are Chinese news sites, private or state-owned (from Neutrality perspective). Redtigerxyz Talk 12:22, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • There isn't really a huge problem with sources, state owned media is usually considered reliable outside of controversial usages, and different language sources are also allowed; As for the hook, from my understanding, it's similar to the Hachiko story. Additionally, the AfD likely won't go very far anyways.Thehistorianisaac Talk 23:48, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Thehistorianisaac and Redtigerxyz: Article's been kept, what else needs doing?--Launchballer 14:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Afd has concluded as Keep. A RM is underway, however does not impact this DYK IMO.
Assuming The Paper as reliable. "From Google translate, it seems that news agencies are saying as per the viral video, the dog is waiting for his master even after 10 years; rather than an independently verified fact that the dog is waiting. The article and the hook needs to be reworded. If my understanding is incorrect, please clarify." is unaddressed. The references are just saying that there is a viral video which claims that the dog is waiting for its master.
I am okay to pass "ALT1 ... as per a viral video, the police dog of Yao Yuanjun was waiting for its master, 10 years after he was killed in action?" or similar. Redtigerxyz Talk 17:37, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Thehistorianisaac: Please address the above.--Launchballer 16:44, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Redtigerxyz: sorry for the late response. The Paper is generally considered reliable by other people from wikiproject China; Nothing against you personally, but I would prefer this DYK Nomination be reviewed by someone who understands chinese, as I have seen cases where google translate messes up. The sources are explaining the story based on the video. I think essentially speaking, the alternate hook you propose is mostly the same, but makes it a bit overly complicated. Thehistorianisaac

As requested by Nominator, requesting a Chinese speaker for a second pair of eyes.Redtigerxyz Talk 17:17, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regan Garden

(
)
Regan Garden
Regan Garden
Created by CanonNi (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 14:28, 29 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article is new enough and long enough. Hook fact is verified in the sources for 0 and ALT2 - rejecting ALT1 as the source reads “1.2 亿元” - 120 million; not as impressive. QPQ has been provided. No copyvio detected, as expected when all sources are in Chinese. Image is… clear enough at that size, and adequately licensed. Good to go. Strongly prefer ALT2. Juxlos (talk) 09:02, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pulled. The source says ownership "changed seven times among four countries" but at least two of these were "occupations" rather than ownership. The ALT hook isn't very good either, so I have returned this one for further discussion. Gatoclass (talk) 10:54, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 22

[edit]

Prince Mortimer

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Created by TriMuseumGeek (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

TriMuseumGeek (talk) 20:01, 22 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi TriMuseumGeek, thanks for you nomination. The article was moved to main space on 22 May so is new enough and is long enough. Unfortunately the sourcing is not up to DYK standards which require a source cited inline at the end of every paragraph as a minimum. I've added the article to the hook above. We need a citation in the article for him dying at 110 in prison (we would also have to say "approximately" to match the article). There are also some grammar issues with the article and it switches between past and present tense. Let me know if you can improve this to meet the criteria and I will take another look - Dumelow (talk) 07:02, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TriMuseumGeek: Please address the above; I will fail this if this is not addressed in a week.--Launchballer 12:23, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dumelow and Launchballer. I'm still getting the hang of this, and appreciate your comments. I tried to make the corrections and additions that you asked. If it is still not meeting the guidelines, I understand. Also, if I mess up this post, I apologize. Wikicode is not my strong suit. -- TriMuseumGeek (talk) 21:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • @TriMuseumGeek: Each "citation needed" template in the article needs to be replaced with a citation before this can be approved. Also, the article does does not give a definitive date of birth, so this hook cannot state that he lived to be 110 unless that can be verified. Z1720 (talk) 15:15, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2023 European Athletics Indoor Championships – Women's 4 × 400 metres relay

(
)
Eveline Saalberg, Femke Bol, Cathelijn Peeters, and Lieke Klaver
Eveline Saalberg, Femke Bol, Cathelijn Peeters, and Lieke Klaver
  • Source: "1 NED - NETHERLANDS 6 0.196 3:25.66 CR" (link)
Improved to Good Article status by Editør (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.

Editør (talk) 14:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Is there a way to shorten the bold link? It seems to be a distraction. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:09, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: I don't think so. I believe this is how titles of the form 'Championships – Event" are typically displayed when there is only one title in the hook, see for instance the DYK hook for Talk:2023 European Athletics Indoor Championships – Women's 400 metres. – Editør (talk) 09:23, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I mean if there's an alternate way to word the link. Right now it feels like a distraction to the reader. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:41, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: I tried that once before, but then the longer bold link was used for the hook, so I've used the longer bold link in my DYK rnominations since then. - Editør (talk) 11:48, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I'm not sure if that was the right decision, because personally I'd consider the longer bold link to fall under WP:DYKTRIM. Maybe other reviewers just didn't notice the issue but here it's rather obvious. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:22, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: In my experience, the most important part about the DYK nomination is that it is factually correct and the sentence works as a hook. Surely, I want to try and phrase it as well as possible, but when it can be completely rewritten in a later stage by a single author, I don't see the point in endless tweaking when all that work can be thrown out without notice. If you see a better way of working the long article title 2023 European Athletics Indoor Championships – Women's 4 × 400 metres relay into the hook, let me know. Besides that, is there anything else holding up this nomination? – Editør (talk) 00:35, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe something similar to how it was originally proposed in the nomination you linked? Just link to "women's 4 × 400 metres relay" and keep 2023 European Athletics Indoor Championships as a separate mention, perhaps also avoiding linking it as being redundant to the main bolded link. It's like how the linked nomination just said "women's 400 metres hurdle at the 2024 European Athletics Championships." As for your other question, I was not planning to review this nomination, the hook just stood out when I was looking at DYKN (and not in a good way). Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:38, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I misunderstood. Well, thank you for noting your concern and for your suggestion. – Editør (talk) 00:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A full review is still needed. – Editør (talk) 22:46, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Editør: Not sure what Naruto's problem is, but "person does their job in an unusual way" hooks tend to do poorly at WP:DYKSTATS - what else do you have?--Launchballer 18:35, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I notice that this, 2024 European Athletics Championships – Women's 4 × 400 metres relay and 2025 European Athletics Indoor Championships – Women's 4 × 400 metres relay all similar problems. Why not knock the four into one hook?--Launchballer 18:42, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, "person does their job in an unusual way" is a description for much of sports, I don't think this is an automatic disqualifier. I am not against combining articles, but I found it hard to come up with a good enough alternative hook in this this nomination. I will need to think about it some more. – Editør (talk) 23:03, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To answer Launchballer's question, my concern was not about hook interest or phrasing, but simply the length of the bolded link. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:50, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 25

[edit]

2024 European Athletics Championships – Women's 4 × 400 metres relay, 2024 World Athletics Indoor Championships – Women's 4 × 400 metres relay

( Comment or view )
Cathelijn Peeters, Lieke Klaver, Femke Bol, and Lisanne de Witte
Cathelijn Peeters, Lieke Klaver, Femke Bol, and Lisanne de Witte
  • Source: #1 "1 NED - NETHERLANDS 9 0.139 3:22.39 EL / 1913 KLAVER Lieke 50.57 (1) / 1915 PEETERS Cathelijn 50.96 (5) 1:41.53 (2) / 1908 DE WITTE Lisanne 50.41 (1) 2:31.94 (1) / 1906 BOL Femke 50.45 (6)" (link)
  • Source: #2 "1 NETHERLANDS NED 5 0.180 3:25.07 WL / 712 Lieke KLAVER 50.26 (1) / 713 Cathelijn PEETERS 51.99 (5) 1:42.25 (1) / 710 Lisanne DE WITTE 52.28 (3) 2:34.53 (1) / 709 Femke BOL 50.54 (3)" (link)
Improved to Good Article status by Editør (talk). Number of QPQs required: 4. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 20 past nominations.

Editør (talk) 19:42, 25 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: These all look good to me. Great work.

Thank you for your review. – Editør (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot come up with a combined hook, so I will try separate hooks.
Here are two alternative hooks for 2024 European Athletics Championships – Women's 4 × 400 metres relay. – Editør (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Women's 4 × 400 m relay final
Women's 4 × 400 m relay final
And here is an alternative hook for 2024 World Athletics Indoor Championships – Women's 4 × 400 metres relay. – Editør (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Cathelijn Peeters, Lieke Klaver, Femke Bol, and Lisanne de Witte
Cathelijn Peeters, Lieke Klaver, Femke Bol, and Lisanne de Witte

Articles created/expanded on May 26

[edit]

Articles created/expanded on May 27

[edit]

2025 European Athletics Indoor Championships – Women's 4 × 400 metres relay

(
)
Women's 4×400 m relay final
Women's 4×400 m relay final
  • Source: for 2021 "1 6 NED - NETHERLANDS 6 0.201 3:27.15 CR" (link)
  • Source for 2023 "1 NED - NETHERLANDS 6 0.196 3:25.66 CR" (link)
  • Source for 2025 "1 NED - Netherlands 5 0.171 3:24.34 CR,WL,NR" (link)
  • ALT1 ... that the cheers were "deafening" when the Dutch team won the women's 4 × 400 metres relay at the 2025 European Athletics Indoor Championships (finish pictured) before a home crowd? Source: "In de finale van de 4×400 meter voor vrouwen bleef het zondagavond lang spannend, toen Bol en de Britse slotloopster naast elkaar de laatste bocht indoken. Maar toen zette Bol, indoor de snelste vrouw op de 400 meter ooit, aan en werd het gat met elke pas groter. Op de streep was het verschil ruim een halve seconde – en het gejuich oorverdovend." [English translation: In the final of the women's 4 × 400 metres on Sunday evening, it remained exciting for a long time, when Bol went into the last bend next to the British anchor runner. But then Bol, the fastest woman in the 400 metres indoors ever, pushed on and the gap grew bigger with every stride. At the finish line, the difference was more than half a second – and the cheers deafening.] (link)
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Harry Wunsch, Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Kercher
Created by Editør (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 23 past nominations.

Editør (talk) 14:39, 30 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Length, history and references verified. However, both hooks are dull: there are a lot of sporting events where particular competitors have won three or more consecutive championships, and I'd fully expect a home crowd to cheer loudly when their athletes won.

    So how about ...

ALT2:... that the Dutch women's 4 x 400 metres relay team won this year's European indoor championship (finish pictured) after appealing a disqualification? Source: "Een diskwalificatie van de Nederlandse estafettevrouwen, wegens hinderen, werd teruggedraaid" ("A disqualification of the Dutch relay women, due to obstacles, was reversed."). Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
review needed for ALT2; I agree the other hooks are dull. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 09:54, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 28

[edit]

Diagnostic overshadowing in autism

(
)
  • ... that that chronic pain or depression in autistic people is sometimes misread as “just part of autism,” delaying diagnosis and care?
  • Source: “Autistic individuals... experience elevated rates of chronic physical conditions, yet symptoms are often dismissed as part of autism rather than investigated as medical concerns.”
— Diagnostic overshadowing in autism article, citing:
Buie et al., 2010. Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Disorders in Individuals With ASDs: A Consensus Report. PMID: 20048083
  • ALT1: ... that that older autistic adults may go untreated for conditions like sensory loss, pain, or memory decline because their symptoms are wrongly attributed to autism?
  • Source: “Older autistic adults... may be at heightened risk for misattributed cognitive decline (e.g., assuming communication challenges reflect autism when it may signal aging-related dementia or memory loss), untreated sensory loss... or inadequate pain management.”
— Diagnostic overshadowing in autism article, citing:
Hand et al., 2020. Prevalence of physical and mental health conditions in Medicare-enrolled, autistic older adults. PMID: 31773968
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: This is my first DYK nomination. This article highlights a significant and under-recognized health equity issue in autism: how co-occurring conditions like chronic pain or memory decline may be missed due to diagnostic overshadowing.
Created by PulsarPen (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

PulsarPen (talk) 17:37, 4 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • @PulsarPen: Thanks for writing an important article like this! Here's the DYK review:
General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - ALT0 isn't fully supported by the article - chronic pain and depression aren't specifically mentioned in the relevant sentence.
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: No - Both hooks need formatting changes.
QPQ: None required.

Overall: The hooks aren't formatted correctly - this guideline describes the standard style that hooks should be written in. As well as this, the first hook (ALT0) isn't supported by the article. Here's suggestions for improving your hooks, with correct formatting and the first hook's issue fixed:

To have the review passed, you'll also have to add citations to the end of a few paragraphs, as "all content that could reasonably be challenged ... must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)." (from this guideline). Here's all the instances that need a citation:

  • Section "Physical health in autistics", paragraph starting "Such misattributions can result in..."
  • Section "Diagnostic overshadowing in reverse", paragraph starting "This form of overshadowing delays access to..."
  • The first paragraph of the "Systemic contributors" section
  • Section "Diagnostic overshadowing over the lifespan", paragraph starting "This form of lifespan overshadowing reflects..."

And one more minor thing: this doesn't affect whether or not the review passes, but usually when providing sources in DYK nominations, quotes are given from the citations themselves in order to make it easier for the reviewer to verify that the hooks are sourced.

Once the citation issues have been fixed, I'll be happy to pass this! I personally think that the first hook is a little more interesting than the second. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 23:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@PulsarPen: Courtesy ping to let you know that this DYK will be rejected for inactivity soon if there's no reply. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 15:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Suntooooth and @IntentionallyDense, thank you both for your time and thoughtful feedback on this DYK. I’ve carefully addressed each point as follows: My intended edits are below. I’m struggling a bit about how to edit the DYK page…. Please bear with me as I try to figure this out (also appreciate any help on the adding my intended edits below) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PulsarPen (talk • contribs) 00:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. Synthesis Concern (IntentionallyDense) Reviewer comment: The article previously cited only epilepsy and GI disorders but made a broader claim about chronic conditions, which could be WP:SYNTH. My response:
I've rewritten the sentence to remove the unsourced generalization. The updated phrasing now ties each condition (e.g., chronic pain, GI symptoms, autoimmune conditions) to secondary sources that explicitly discuss them. I also added:

  • Mason et al. (2019): A systematic review that documents elevated chronic physical health conditions in autistic adults.
  • Croen et al. (2015): A population-level study supporting multisystem health disparities.

This ensures that the revised statement reflects the scope of the sources used and avoids synthesis.

2. Hook Citation Support (Suntooooth) Reviewer comment: ALT0 originally referenced chronic pain and depression, but those conditions weren’t clearly cited in the article sentence used. My response:
I revised the hook for clarity and ensured it matches the wording and sourcing in the article. The final hook is now: ALT0: ... that chronic conditions in autistic people are sometimes misread as "just part of autism", delaying diagnosis and care? This wording directly reflects the cited section of the article, which now ends with high-quality secondary citations (e.g., Mason et al. 2019, Buie et al. 2010).

3. Citation Placement at End of Paragraphs Reviewer comment: Several paragraphs did not end with citations as required. My response:
I’ve reviewed and updated all flagged paragraphs to ensure proper citation placement, specifically:

  • “Physical health in autistics” — now ends with Mason et al. (2019)
  • “Diagnostic overshadowing in reverse” — now ends with Moyse & Porter (2015), a secondary source
  • First paragraph of “Systemic contributors” — updated to cite Mason et al. (2019)
  • Paragraph in “Diagnostic overshadowing over the lifespan” — ends with Croen et al. (2015) and Mason et al. (2019)

4. Hook Formatting Reviewer comment: Hooks weren’t in standard format. My response:
Both hooks have now been updated to follow the DYK format:

  • ALT0: ... that chronic conditions in autistic people are sometimes misread as "just part of autism", delaying diagnosis and care?
  • ALT1: ... that older autistic adults may go untreated for conditions like sensory loss, pain, or memory decline because their symptoms are wrongly attributed to autism?

Each now appears as a complete question in DYK style and reflects a verified section in the article with inline secondary citations.

5. Quotes from Sources (Optional Suggestion) Reviewer suggestion: Consider quoting the sources in the DYK nomination to make reviewer verification easier. My response:
I’ve added direct quote snippets from Buie et al. (2010), Mason et al. (2019), and Croen et al. (2015) into the nomination template to make verification easier.

“Autistic individuals experience elevated rates of a wide range of chronic physical conditions…” Mason et al. (2019) “Chronic constipation, abdominal pain, and other GI symptoms… are often misinterpreted as behavioral issues in autism.” –Buie et al. (2010) “Autistic adults had significantly higher rates of chronic conditions including hypertension, diabetes, and dementia.” Croen et al. (2015) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PulsarPen (talk • contribs) 00:08, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, but I'm going to have to ask for a second opinion from another reviewer. I'm not 100% sure that this should pass, and I'm on holiday right now so I don't have time to give this the attention it deserves - but I don't think it's a straightforward pass. (Also, you obviously didn't read the format guideline I linked in the review.) Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 00:26, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How Do You Do (Shakira song)

(
)
  • ... that Shakira's song "How Do You Do" was banned across the Middle East due to its lyrics addressing God in a way considered blasphemous?
  • Reviewed:
Created by 1arch (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

1arch (talk) 15:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • New enough and long enough, but there's a bit of a sourcing/verification issue: the article from 2005 doesn't actually say the *song* was banned, or that there was a formal ban extending across the entire Middle East. What it describes is the *entire album* being withheld from Middle Eastern markets by its Muslim-owned distributor, who objected to the song's lyrics. Plus, our article on the album mentions that it *was* released in the Middle East (though with modified cover art), so the situation seems to be a bit more complex.
A more accurate hook could be:
But first, we'll need to make sure we understand what exactly was banned (the song as the DYK currently says, or the album, per the source), by whom, and how it eventually returned to the market. Mariamnei (talk) 10:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • I looked into it and found another source from a book that clarifies that the album was released in some countries in the Middle East, but even then without the song. So, I was thinking this would do:
    • ALT1: ... that Shakira's Oral Fixation, Vol. 2 was only released in a few Middle Eastern countries, and even then, without the song "How Do You Do", which was deemed blasphemous? 1arch (talk) 15:45, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • @1arch: Great! Could you please share the original quote from the book source so I can verify the content? Once you've added the quote here, and the source below the above alternative (as you did with the first option), we should be good to go. Mariamnei (talk) 09:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Operators and Things

(
)
  • ... that the Nashville Banner said Operators and Things​​​ ​​​​​​​would both interest laymen and impress professionals due to its thorough examination of the unconscious self? Source: https://www.newspapers.com/article/nashville-banner/172319537/
    • ALT1: ... that a book described as "an absorbing account of life in the dream world of a schizophrenic" was written by an anonymous author? Source: "Operators and Things: The Inner Life of a Schizophrenic". Publishers Weekly. Vol. 207, no. 5. F. Leypoldt. February 3, 1975. p. 44.
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Hillbilly Thomists
    • Comment: Tried my best to come up with some real interesting hooks for article 7 mil, would love other suggestions from the current text or if more is added in the future. ALT1 I was a bit unsure about the wording of anonymous vs pseudonymous, but per discussion at Talk:Operators and Things#Replace anonymous with pseudonymous? landed on this. ALT1 is also linked to an offline source, I've asked the author on their talkpage for a scan or equivalent of the source, given the shifting winds I see in regards to AGF sources.
Created by Therapyisgood (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

PixDeVl (T | C | G) 21:59, 31 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • @PixDeVl: You can just google the quote from Publishers Weekly and look on Google Books and find it that way. Also it's on the back of the 2011 version, I believe, or at the very least it's on the Amazon.com page for the 2011 publishing. Therapyisgood (talk) 01:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Therapyisgood: found and verified, thank you! Never thought to just search it funny enough, I queried the whole citation and even combed the Internet Archives a bit for the issue. Cheers! --PixDeVl (T | C | G)
  • How about something like ALT2 '...that the author of the 1958 autobiographical account (memoir?) Operators and Things, describing a schizophrenic author's experiences with "operators", has never been identified?' or even simply ALT3 '...that the anonymous 1958 autobiographical account Operators and Things describes a woman's onset and recovery from schizophrenia, aided by "operators"?'
I like this "has never been identified" version, that's a proper hook for a "did you know". Mateussf (talk) 11:16, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Mateussf: I like that former hook, I'd add that as an ALT2, but it may be a little bit long(WP:DYKTRIM). Not super sure on memoir vs account. --PixDeVl (T | C | G) 15:37, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@PixDeVl: the problem is she was identified, though, for the 1976 publication ("According to the 2011 version, the last time anyone had heard from O'Brien was in 1976, when she wrote an additional chapter for a new version of the book. Her author's blurb for the 1976 publication stated she was "fully recovered" and living outside of Los Angeles."). Therapyisgood (talk) 01:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've added ALT names, both ideas are within an acceptable wordcount. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 01:34, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
How about ALT4... that the identity of "Barbara O'Brien", the author of Operators and Things, a 1958 autobiographical account of schizophrenia, has not been publicly revealed?

Review needed. Z1720 (talk) 15:23, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Long enough, new enough. QPQ done and Earwig is clean. ALT4 is interesting and short enough, though expect a prepbuilder to trim it. Per WP:DYKCITE, I must ask for a quote from the source.--Launchballer 19:22, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on May 30

[edit]

Nancy Broadfield Parkinson, George Mearns Savery, Elizabeth Wilhelmina Jones

( Comment or view )
Elizabeth Wilhelmina Jones
Elizabeth Wilhelmina Jones
  • Source: Hewlett, Dorothy (1981). Harrogate College 1893-1973. North Yorkshire, England: Harrogate College. ISBN 9780950742700.
Moved to mainspace by Storye book (talk). Number of QPQs required: 6. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 114 past nominations.

Storye book (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • I understand what you're going for with the hook, but is this really interesting to a broad audience? If a reader is unfamiliar with any of the names provided, the hook doesn't really sound all that interesting, it just said that these names were all involved in a particular school. My suggestion would be to propose individual hooks about each person, rather than going with a multi-hook. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 04:21, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree; the three articles are best understood if read together. Parkinson, an orphaned female, could never have achieved what she did in that era, without that school, and that school would never have existed as a pioneering, ground-breaking school without those two educational pioneers, Savery and Jones. There is no space in a DYK hook to explain that, and on WP we are not allowed to explain things. Our readers have to work it out. For that, they need to read all three articles. So - sorry, we need this to be a triple. I have added ALT2 and ALT3, which may answer your above concern somewhat. Storye book (talk) 10:01, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that helps much, even with the additional context. I'm very sorry, but I have struck the hooks for now. I'd like to see first some individual hook proposals first and see if it is at least feasible for them to stand alone. We can revisit the idea for a triple hook if none of them have feasible individual hooks. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:44, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the three articles already stand alone as articles. But what they stand for, hookwise, as a set of three is more important. For a woman to attain that position, and achieve that national recognition, requires a level and quality of education which in those days in the UK was not easily available, even for men. I have unstruck ALTs 2 and 3, because I believe we need a second opinion on this. New reviewers: please check out the above discussion. Thank you. Storye book (talk) 08:00, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, I am open to the possibility of a triple hook. I was not closing the door on it entirely. I just said that you needed to at least try to propose first individual hooks for the three. We could then discuss those individual hooks and see if any of them met the interest guidelines. If those hooks would not work out, then the triple hook idea could be revisited. As it stands, you did not even try to propose individual hooks: you were already closed to the idea.
Also, in response to your comment, "For a woman to attain that position, and achieve that national recognition, requires a level and quality of education which in those days in the UK was not easily available, even for men," that arguably counts as specialist information. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:04, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, reading through the articles right now, if your point is to show that Parkinson was an exceptional woman who deserves recognition, then that is arguably even more of an argument in favor of an individual hook at least for her, because a triple hook would be like tying her to other notable people instead of allowing her to stand on her own. I have gone through all three articles and all three were accomplished people in their own right: I do not think a triple hook that is primarily about Parkinson would give justice to Savery or Jones. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:08, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you really want, I can offer a compromise: given how Savery and Jones worked together and both of their articles devote large portions to their collaboration, I am open to a double hook with Savery and Jones, although I would also suggest at least trying to suggest individual hooks for either as possible options. However, I would still recommend that Parkinson have a separate individual hook. As it stands, her article does not even mention Savery, only Jones, and even then, only in passing, and I'm not really a fan of the idea of a hook about her being primarily about her links to others. The more about I think this, while I'm still open to the idea of a triple hook, the more I think it is not the best option and should be more-or-less a last resort. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:24, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have asked for a second opinion, and you have written above, twice, that you are open to a triple hook. That request of mine would include asking the new reviewer (or possibly reviewers, since it's 3 articles) to review the articles properly, and to consider ALT3, so I have unstruck it. Remember that you have only commented on the hook(s), and you have not actually reviewed the articles, so we still need a reviewer. Please don't edit-war over hook-striking. The above hooks do not break WP rules; they do not lie or mislead. Your striking is only about your own opinion.
As for specialist information - how many first-world countries can you think of, where in the World War II era, women could - as easily as men - hold top government civil service positions, and get national awards for it? I think that most citizens of first-world countries would not expect to see women in top government posts during World War II. Think of all the photos you have seen of groups of important top government people signing documents at that time. Do you remember seeing women frequently among all the male suits and uniforms? I am not saying that there were no women in those formal photographs. I am saying that women officials in those photographs were uncommon. So no, that is not specialist information. Storye book (talk) 11:24, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do not understand why you are so close-minded to the idea of individual hooks about the three people, especially when I gave good reasons to move away from the triple hook. I mean, the current triple hook makes it seem like we're only really talking about Parkinson rather than also Savery and Jones: do you really want a hook that downplays Savery and Jones? In fact, the hook arguably downplays all three subjects: it reduces Parkinson to just someone who went to a school, and it reduces Savery and Jones to being a school founder. If we went with individual hooks, we could at least describe and promote their individual achievements. Yes, there's context behind Parkinson going to that school, but is that context going to be obvious in the hook? No, and that is the kind of hook that the guidelines explicitly discourage: hooks that are reliant on specialist information, or at least hooks that require explanations to be understandable.
As for the unstriking, you were the one who unstruck the hooks after I struck them, even though I gave my reasons as to why they were struck. If anything, you are acting in bad faith if you are accusing me of edit-warring, when this could have been avoided if you simply stated disagreement with the striking without actually unstriking the hooks yourself. You are free to disagree with a reviewer (not necessarily me), but accusing them of edit-warring, when arguably you should not have unstruck the hooks in the first place, is arguably showing bad faith. My suggestion remains to move away from that angle for now, and to revisit it if other options fall through. For what it is worth, I asked on Discord for opinions regarding ALT3 (in a neutral manner), and the responses said that ALT3 was not interesting to a broad audience. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:39, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the interest of this moving forward, I will be reviewing the three articles:
  • Nancy Broadfield Parkinson: checkY the article was moved to mainspace on May 30, so it is new enough. It is long enough, adequately sourced. Two QPQs have been done and they were proper, so they are accepted. I did not detect any close paraphrasing.
  • Elizabeth Wilhelmina Jones: checkY also moved to mainspace on May 30, and meets the length, sourcing, and paraphrasing requirements. Two QPQs have been provided for it.
  • George Mearns Savery: checkY moved to mainspace on the same date, I did not find close paraphrasing, DYK requirements are met, two QPQs done.
I have gone through all three articles, and I'm actually surprised that you did not even propose what is arguably the most interesting aspect about Parkinson. I'll be proposing it as the individual hook for her:
Nancy Broadfield Parkinson
That's actually a standout moment of her life, far more than just simply talking about her going to a school. I would highly suggest focusing on this aspect of her as it is a major accomplishment, and also an interesting aspect of her life that is not reliant on having a background in the history of British education. My only concern about this aspect is that I could not find any UNESCO sites that mention Parkinson, but maybe there are offline sources about it.
George Mearns Savery
As for Jones and Savery, I've proposed individual hooks for both of them, as well as a double hook:
Let me know what you think about these hooks so that we can ask for a new reviewer to review them (I cannot review these hooks myself). In the interest of compromise, I am even unstriking ALT3 to allow for that reviewer to also consider it in addition to the individual hooks and the double hook. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:19, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: Thank you for all your hard work on this one. OK, I'll accept Parkinson as a single, and Savery and Jones as a double nom. I have added the quotation from the source for your ALT-NBP Parkinson hook. The British Council, being a government department, is a sufficiently authoritative source for the hook, and is online and verifiable.
I accept your hooks, with the exception of the following: I have adjusted your ALT-G/E hook (i.e. replaced "founding" with "development"), because Jones was not around when the school was founded, but they collaborated in a very intense manner for a short while over the development of the school (then Savery became ill and died, so that Jones carried on the development, but nevertheless, the collaboration was important, and is mentioned in a number of sources in both articles.). In the same hook, I have replaced "women's" with "girls'", because in that era girls did not come of age (I be legally considered women) until they were 21 years old. The school taught girls aged roughly 5-18 years. Storye book (talk) 09:09, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The infobox ID image from the Parkinson article could be used with her new hook if required. I have added it to her hook above.. I do believe, though, that the above Jones image should be used in the double nom, because it is so eye-catching and beautiful. (And anyway, there does appear to be a reluctance to use ID pics of old, bearded white men on DYK). Storye book (talk) 09:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Now, I have no idea how to re-jig this nom into a single and double. BlueMoonset can you fix that? Thank you. Storye book (talk) 09:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]
I mean that I could not find a third-party source other than the British Council that confirmed the UNESCO fact, since ideally I would have wanted a third-party source for a rather exceptional claim, or even an actual UNESCO source. Since Parkinson was associated with the British Council, they are not exactly an independent source. Anyway, since you've agreed to the new hook proposals, I'm asking for a new reviewer to review all the options proposed so far (including ALT3 and my proposals). Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:06, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree that such a formal and established British government source as the British Council should need a confirmatory citation. Are you disrespecting the government of my country? However I have added to Parkinson's article a photo of Parkinson as a UNESCO delegate, and added a sentence about it with a newspaper citation. Storye book (talk) 11:05, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No need to be offended. It's just that some editors at DYK tend to be skeptical of non-independent or primary sources, so it's mostly for their benefit. I am personally okay with the source as I'm not the kind of editor who's particular about them, but I know that some editors tend to challenge such sources. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:07, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fire-eye

(
)
White-backed fire-eye antbird
White-backed fire-eye antbird
  • ... that the fire-eye antbirds' (pictured) calls instead of songs are used to tell the species apart?
  • Source: In a 2017 study, researchers found that "when [they] examined Pyriglena

vocalizations in this context, the outcomes revealed substantial diversity in their calls, rather than their songs [thus it] underscores the need to consider all vocalizations in taxonomic studies."

https://doi.org/10.11646%2Fzootaxa.4291.2.3
    • Reviewed:
5x expanded by Tkronos1 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Tkronos1 (talk) 13:08, 30 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

@Jaireeodell: Hooks must not contain parentheses outside of (pictured) per WP:DYK200.--Launchballer 16:41, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: Thanks! I didn't know that. Would this work? ALT1 ... that the fire-eye antbirds' (pictured) use calls, not songs, to identify different antbird species? Jaireeodell (talk) 21:36, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me, though I recommend ALT1a: ... that fire-eye antbirds (pictured) use calls to identify different antbird species rather than songs?. It's the same as ALT0 with no new information, so you could approve it yourself.--Launchballer 13:21, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Launchballer and Jaireeodell: Are we certain that the source says it is the birds who use these calls? To me it sounds like it says that it is the researchers who do. Surtsicna (talk) 18:14, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, they aren't calling to blend in with other species, are they? Even so, to your point, would this work: ALT2: ... that fire-eye antbirds (pictured) may be identified from different antbird species by their calls rather than their songs?. Jaireeodell (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gheorghe Plagino

(
)
  • ... that Gheorghe Plagino, the first Romanian competitor at the Olympics, was born out of wedlock?
5x expanded by History6042 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

History6042😊 (Contact me) 16:54, 30 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]


Articles created/expanded on May 31

[edit]

Werner Mamugwe

(
)
  • Source: Oiva Angula. SWAPO Captive: A Comrade’s Experience of Betrayal and Torture. Penguin Random House South Africa, 2018
Moved to mainspace by Soman (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 436 past nominations.

Soman (talk) 23:32, 31 May 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Dwkaminski (talk) 13:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on June 5

[edit]

June 2025 Gaza Freedom Flotilla

(
)
Created by DERPALERT (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 301 past nominations.

Launchballer 01:07, 12 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks, Launchballer. Here's one more:

  • ALT1: ... that in June 2025 Israeli forces intercepted European humanitarians in international waters and forcibly took them to Israel?

Surtsicna (talk) 08:22, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

With apologies for nitpicking, 'International waters' (although informally used a lot in this context) is not strictly applicable- closest more accurate term without getting too verbose would be 'non-territorial waters'.Yadsalohcin (talk) 10:42, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: No - also not neutral
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Apologies, much as per Yad above. This is a well written article, and would be acceptable in many contexts, but the many-headed Israeli/Palestinian conflict is one of the Wikipedia's most active third rails (second only to ... Capitalization Disputes? ), where we've got to work hard to get as close to neutrality as we can, and there are a couple of visible and important balance issues.

  • The most obvious one/or two is the title and the lead: "A flotilla was organized in June 2025 by the Freedom Flotilla Coalition" - well, no. Unless I'm missing something in the article, it was one ship, and not a particularly large one, a dozen sources say "boat". One ship or boat is not a flotilla (this link is also in the article lead!) any more than one soldier is an army or one mugger is a gang (one man band is an exception, not the rule). And the majority of the article sources also make this quite clear, most of them say "aid boat", "aid ship", etc. Yes, it was sent by the Flotilla Coalition, and it is part of a series, so I could, possibly, see the argument that the title could stay, but our text should be clear that it was no more a flotilla than Larry King was a monarch.
  • Then there are the hooks, "a humanitarian vessel" or "European humanitarians". That's loaded language, and it is not at all clear that this language would be accepted by all sides as a neutral description of the event. Yes, that is what the proponents would say, but a noticeable number of critics, the Israelis - of course - but also a number of US politicians, and the president of Argentina (!), have basically described the event as primarily a publicity stunt and an actual attempt at humanitarianism (is that a word?) way down the list of motivations. I'd be OK with describing it as "aid vessel", since that can be interpreted as either humanitarian or publicity aid, or perhaps you can think of even a better neutral phrasing.
  • Again, I like most of the article, only these few things need fixing. But they're a prominent few things. GRuban (talk) 15:10, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For now, pinging @Surtsicna and DERPALERT:. If they don't respond, I'll take a look.--Launchballer 15:21, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did that too, on their talk pages. I know formally you're the DYK nominator, but you didn't write the article so ... --GRuban (talk) 15:40, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 6

[edit]

Michelle Pfeiffer (Ethel Cain song)

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by Locust member (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 299 past nominations.

Launchballer 00:07, 12 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

I did mention at Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Quit Dreaming and Get on the Beam that 5000+ views a day says a broad audience knows who she is and that therefore almost any hook would pass the 'intriguing' part of WP:DYKINT. I'm not going to refuse to suggest a "normal" hook at this point, but given that pop music hooks do poorly at WP:DYKSTATS (I was shocked by how badly Push 2 Start did), I strongly recommend that we go with an April Fool's hook for this (albeit maybe not this one).--Launchballer 01:03, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, two other editors objected to the hook (not just me), so it seems that there is loose consensus at least to move away from this angle or even from an April Fools' angle entirely. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:06, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good hook that creates plenty of intrigue and should get plenty of hits, indeed, it would probably do better if it wasn't used on April Fool's Day (when a bunch of questionable hooks tend to degrade overall impact) but just used as a standard quirky. Not every hook needs to spell out every aspect of the topic - probably half the hooks posted omit detail to create more interest. Gatoclass (talk) 02:51, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gotta agree with Naruto, this is not "interesting". The only thought that I am left with after reading it is "where's the rest of the sentence?" And just because a broad audience knows who someone is does not mean that "almost any hook" would be intriguing. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 13:16, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shorter hooks tend to be more effective, and omitting the quote marks would only be allowed on April Fool's Day.
ALT1: ... that Michelle Pfeiffer has been described as "a breath of fresh air"?
ALT2: ... that a Michelle Pfeiffer performance typically lasts about 4 minutes and 31 seconds?
ALT3: ... that Michelle Pfeiffer has been described as "stylish"?
ALT4: ... that Michelle Pfeiffer has been described as possessing "a cresting emotionality grand enough to fill the tallest IMAX screen"?
ALT5: ... that Michelle Pfeiffer was inspired by Michelle Pfeiffer?--Launchballer 16:54, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT5 seems interesting.--User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 18:23, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can live with ALT5. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:30, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1910 Italy v France football match

(
)
Italy team before the match
Italy team before the match
Created by Wikipediæ philosophia (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 13 past nominations.

Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 22:25, 7 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Wikipediæ philosophia, there is uncited material in the article I have tagged which needs citing. The article also needs a copyedit for prose. These are issues I would expect the reviewer to pick up. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:17, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
apologies I reviewed that DYK before the article underwent major changes and was tagged for copyedit. Moondragon21 (talk) 13:52, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Z1720:,  Fixed (Thanks to User Vaseline, who gave me a hand). Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 19:31, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Z1720:, frankly, no. Concerning the copy edit, probably it would be more sensible to ping someone who may be interested in. I always strive to write as correctly as possible, but my English isn’t C2 yet, lol. Regarding the lacking sources, I’ll fix asap. Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikipediæ philosophia: The Guild of Copy Editors might be able to help with the copy edit. Z1720 (talk) 16:03, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Catastrophically evaporating planet

(
)
Created by Fdfexoex (talk) and Meli thev (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

jlwoodwa (talk) 01:40, 6 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • article is long enough, new enough, and within policy. Hook is short enough and interesting. QPQ is not required. Note to the nominator(s), next time please provide a source for the hook in the nomination. I am using this one, btw. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:59, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 7

[edit]

Kamla Jaan

(
)
  • Sources:
  1. Ambreesh Mishra (July 23, 2007). "First Eunuch Mayor of India – Kamala Jaan". India Today. Archived from the original on 2019-11-02. Retrieved 2019-11-02.
  2. Haviland, Charles (2002-08-29). "India's first eunuch mayor unseated". BBC. Retrieved 2025-03-14.
  • Reviewed:
Moved to mainspace by Toadspike (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Luke1437 (talk) 18:53, 8 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

I strongly recommend shortening this to:
  • ALT3: ... that Kamla Jaan became India's first eunuch mayor in 2000?
"Eunuch" can be swapped for "third gender" or "trans"; sources generally say they are interchangeable. We cannot say that she was elected in 2000. The sources are ambiguous, but from what I can tell she was probably elected in 1999 and took office in January 2000. Finally, I oppose ALT1 for being boring and I have made some grammatical fixed to ALT2, though the "quota" part still doesn't read smoothly. Toadspike [Talk] 18:17, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion this "first" hook has strong sourcing to back it up, but if a non-"first" hook is needed, I suggest a condensed version of ALT1:
  • ALT4: ... that Kamla Jaan, a hijra and mayor of Katni, was removed from office because the electoral rolls listed her as male?
Source: [3]. ALT1's wording makes it hard to understand and thus not as interesting. Toadspike [Talk] 19:24, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Luke1437: The article is new and long enough, but close paraphrasing is a big problem. The BBC article seems to have been practically copied. Other than that, the article has an immense potential to produce a good hook. I would suggest a hook that mentions how she was an illiterate eunuch angle whose candidacy looked like a prank until she actually won. Surtsicna (talk) 18:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Selim Al Deen Muktamanch

(
)
Muktamanch from Right entrance
Muktamanch from Right entrance
5x expanded by FaysaLBinDaruL (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

~ Φαϊσάλ (talk) 21:05, 7 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

ALT 3: ... that rain unexpectedly began to fall moments after the monsoon song began at same place, twice? Source: Source 1; Source 2

~ Φαϊσάλ (talk) 12:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The hook may need to be revised as it is hard to understand. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5: "the song gained a legendary reputation after two remarkable performances at Jahangirnagar University’s Muktamanch, rain unexpectedly began to fall moments after song started. In 1991, just moments after the song began, rain unexpectedly began to fall. The phenomenon repeated itself in 1992 at the same venue during another performance of the song—further cementing its mythical connection to the monsoon." - This is the attractive/amazing info linked to the song and place. To keep the hook's length within 200 prose characters, and make it more interesting the hook is abbreviated as the ALT 3 one.
This is a common practice for DYK. For example, you may check Scenes in the Square. There is a Mr. Bean statue. Its is mentioned in article as well. For DYK the nominator make it more interestingly proposed the hooks as ".. that you can sit next to Mr. Bean (pictured) in Leicester Square?" without mentioning the name of article. Also many times two article is represented in one hook. ~ Φαϊσάλ (talk) 15:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on June 8

[edit]

Bob Wicks

(
)
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 373 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:36, 16 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Reading this for the first time, the hook seems to be really interesting, but it seems not to have been followed upon on the article. It says "Starting in fourth grade and continuing through college, he was often teammates with quarterback John Strycula". The article could've specified Strycula went to Royal Oak and Utah State, as well. His association with Wicks was never mentioned again in the article aside from that. Howard the Duck (talk) 14:32, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on June 9

[edit]

European Australian Movement

(
)
Moved to mainspace by TarnishedPath (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

TarnishedPathtalk 09:50, 9 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: No - n
  • Other problems: No - A mere mission statement is not interesting. Even so, this claim seems rather ordinary for a Neo-Nazi organization. I believe more content should be added to this article so that more interesting information can be found.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I would recommend you first build up information about the organization's history, its beliefs, and its activities before adding claims to the infobox. Also, the image of the flag is most likely copyrighted in Australia, so it should be hosted locally on enwiki. ―Howard • 🌽33 13:59, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Howardcorn33 I've removed the flag and the predecessors stuff from the infobox. Does that resolve most of the points above aside from the subjective opinion that the hook is not interesting?TarnishedPathtalk 14:29, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TarnishedPath: "Anti-LGBT," "Antisemitism," "Ecofascism" should be discussed in the article body itself. The year of formation is also uncited. ―Howard • 🌽33 14:38, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Howardcorn33 fixed. Per the interesting part, I'd think that it is only uninteresting if you know who they are, which can be said of almost every hook. If there anything else which is uncited? TarnishedPathtalk 16:15, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TarnishedPath: Infobox and citations are OK. I suppose I can only speak for myself when saying if something is interesting, but the provided hook only describes a stated aim of a Western far-right organization which may well apply to dozens of far-right organizations around the world. I don't see anything exceptional about it. (Just to be clear, this is my 3rd time reviewing a DYK, so I'm not the most experienced to talk about this. If you disagree, then I would be OK with a second opinion.) ―Howard • 🌽33 16:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Howardcorn33, no worries, I'll take you up on your suggestion and request a second opinion. TarnishedPathtalk 16:34, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
TarnishedPathtalk 04:31, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
TarnishedPathtalk 07:19, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 10

[edit]

Sraboner Meghgulo Joro Holo Akashe

(
)
Created by FaysaLBinDaruL (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

~ Φαϊσάλ (talk) 14:17, 17 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Sure. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Baena (surname)

(
)
  • ... that, outside of Spain, the Spanish surname Baena is often associated with people of Sephardi Jewish descent?
Converted from a redirect by Kingsif (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 138 past nominations.

Kingsif (talk) 04:01, 14 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 11

[edit]

Undefeated (band)

(
)
Lis Dunckel of Undefeated
Lis Dunckel of Undefeated
  • ... that when Lis Dunckel (pictured) replaced the previous bassist for Undefeated, she didn't know how to play bass?
Created by 3family6 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 109 past nominations.

3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 12:46, 13 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation

Image eligibility:

  • Freely licensed: No - All images used in the article have lacked permission for more than a week. They should be removed unless permission is received.
  • Used in article: Yes
  • Clear at 100px: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting hook. Well-cited article, although I would personally mark out the primary sources using {{Primary sources references section}}. ―Howard • 🌽33 13:48, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@3family6: Forgot to ping. ―Howard • 🌽33 11:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Regarding the images, the band told me ,(via email) that they've sent in the forms, it's the Wikimedia volunteer side that hasn't responded. I'm not sure what the approach is in such situations.--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 11:53, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest consulting c:Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard ―Howard • 🌽33 12:16, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll leave a message there.--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 20:37, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's currently in process. I reached out to the band again and Meredith is attempting to re-send the information.--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 23:28, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Klaus König

(
)
5x expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 2146 past nominations.

Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:33, 18 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article meets DYK requirements: it is new enough, long enough, and adequately sourced. It is free from close paraphrasing, and a QPQ has been done. The article appeared on Recent deaths so it remains DYK eligible.
There are, however, multiple issues with the hook as currently written. The first is that it is hard to understand: the mention of "after the Fall of the Berlin Wall" is vague. Is it referring to a performance during the actual destruction of the Berlin Wall, immediately after the wall's fall, or is it referring to a time period? Second, the hook is very complex: it is hard to see the point here. What is the relation between him performing Tannhäuser and performing the Ninth Symphony? One doesn't lead to another, and it is unclear what is even the main hook fact. Even the mention of Bernstein seems irrelevant to the hook, if the intention is to focus on König. The hook as written is not only hard to understand, but it is in dire need of a trimming.
The third, and perhaps the biggest issue, is hook interest. As currently written, the hook fails DYKINT: it is unlikely to be perceived as interesting to a non-specialist reader. The layperson reader would not find it interesting that an opera performer performed Tannhäuser or Beethoven's Ninth Symphony. This is what the regulars at WT:DYK would call a "boring" hook, and it would be very unlikely to survive scrutiny at WT:DYK. I have struck the hook due to these issues: please propose a new one (do not unstrike, as unstriking does not resolve any of the three concerns I have raised), and ideally a completely different direction. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We could split the hook in two only: DYK has only one sentence for him. We could end at that he was the tenor called to portray Tannhäuser at some of the greatest opera houses in the world. But then we'd miss that not only was he great in concert, but he took part in this truly legendary performance right after the border between the Germanies was opened (where for the first time the word "Freude" was replaced by "Freiheit" (Freedom}, which was done again in a Soladarity concert for Ukraine in Frankfurt in April 2022}. Some people may remember, and remember better when Bernstein is mentioned who stood for that. To say only that would leave him a concert singer while he was one of the few heldentenors in opera at the time, but of the Tannhäuser type, not the Siegfried type, - the roles are given to distinguish, like you wouldn't only say about a sports person that they played with balls, but say if tennis or baseball. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:03, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The issue here Gerda is that the context you are giving is simply not information that the average reader knows. The average reader is not going to know about how big of a deal Tannhäuser is, or what a heldentenor is. You are an expert on classical music and opera, but the average person will know almost nothing if not nothing about it. If anything, your explanation only further shows why the hook does not meet DYKINT. If you want something simple, maybe a hook about his background as a house painter and decorator would work. At the very least, it would require less knowledge from the average reader. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:13, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:20, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Given the lack of a suitable hook, I am marking this for closure. If you want the nomination to continue, instead of asking for a second opinion or reverting this edit, please propose a new hook instead. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 14:23, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) No. I don' want something simple. I want to get as close as what was special about this unique person as I can. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:26, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
4meter4: do you have an idea? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:28, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing hooky stands out. The article lacks a compelling biographical narrative and is a bit too WP:RESUME like at the moment. It's hard to come up with something hooky when all you have is a bunch of repertoire/venue lists and reviews that lack anything particularly striking. It's the personalization of content that makes a biography hook stand out, and at the moment the article doesn't really capture what makes Klaus König different from other operatic tenors of a similar stature. You don't get the sense of who he is as human being or what made him unique as a singer, although you can tell what kind of tenor he was if you know opera. But knowing someone's fach/repertoire isn't really all that interesting. The problem is honestly in the content. You'll need to dig around to find a fact that is compelling and add it to the article, because currently there is nothing there suitable for DYK.4meter4 (talk) 22:09, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1 ... that German operatic tenor Klaus König trained as a house painter and decorator before starting his music career? @4meter4: How does this sound? This seems to be the only thing in the article that seemed hooky to me. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:38, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd rather withdraw. He had attention when among the Recent deaths. The chance that DYK potentially offers is to say something defining about him. I wouldn't be surprised if that memorable concert to liberty was among his proudest moment, and doubt that the training as a housepainter was. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:57, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerda Arendt No Gerda. Please read WP:DYKHOOKSTYLE. DYK's purpose is not to say something defining but something surprising or attention grabbing. The Symphony No. 9 concert was important and it is interesting but it takes more than a paragraph to really explain its significance. There's not really a way to distill what made that concert special into a single sentence. You have to remember that many readers who were not alive during the Cold War may not be familiar with the division of Berlin or the Berlin Wall, and Symphony No. 9 concert was unique because of it's deliberate bringing together of international artists from across political divides to perform instead of an "ode to joy" an "ode to freedom". The article itself doesn't really do a good job at contextualizing the concert and its significance either. Regardless, that fact isn't really about König but more about the concert. König was only one of hundreds of musicians who participated. The best biographical hooks are centered on the individual, and are about them. 4meter4 (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The readers not alive might learn a bit, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alt 2 ... that opera singer Klaus König has been described as "one of the most important tenors of his generation, especially in the heroic tenor repertoire"?
    ALT2 is acceptable. I'd like it better without the initial "opera singer", - we can't help that the quote is repetitious (tenor). It's also not clear how much authority the unnamed source has to declare such a thing. I believe that most readers knowing what a heroic tenor is will expect some Siegfried, not Tannhäuser (the by far more interesting character). But acceptable, thank you. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:54, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerda Arendt You have to remember that the majority of English speakers, particularly in the United States, are fairly ignorant about opera. Most have never been to an opera performance, and are not familiar with the terminology used in voice type/fach classification. Most readers won't know what a "heroic tenor" is and won't automatically associate the word "tenor" with an opera singer. Americans will think of school or church choirs and the tenor section when they hear the term. Opera literacy is not imbedded within the American consciousness as a whole and Wagnerian opera is staged for the most part only in New York, San Francisco, Chicago, and Houston. It rarely gets performed outside of those cities because the company's don't have the resources. Americans make up the largest percentage of readers and editors on the English wiki, so we do need to consider what is "specialized knowledge" in relation to the general public on the English wiki.4meter4 (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of this. Only, If they know "tenor" from choir singing they know enough to understand the hook without "opera singer", and "heroic" invites to investigate further. Those who don't may not know "opera" either, or be not interested at that early point.
ALT3: ... that Klaus König made his debut at the Metropolitan Opera, as Erik in Wagner's Der fliegende Holländer, at age 59?
ALT4: ... that Klaus König portrayed Wagner's Tannhäuser in Dresden, for his American debut, and at the Teatro Massimo Bellini at age 60? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I don't think this is going anywhere, so I am approving only ALT2. ALT3 and ALT4 do not resolve 4meter4's concerns regarding readers' familiarity with opera roles; in fact, they are only doubling down on the issues he raised about how niche opera is among the general public. ALT2 is cited inline and verified in the source. It is admittedly not the most spectacular hook, but I can't approve ALT1 myself since I proposed it, so ALT2 it is. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:29, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Those who don't may not know "opera" either, or be not interested at that early point. That is exactly what we are trying to avoid with DYK hooks. If a DYK hook is explicitly only targeted to those who may be interested in the hook, no matter how small that group is, that goes against DYKHOOKSTYLE/DYKINT. ALT3 and ALT4 are rejected. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:31, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you understood what I tried to say.
  1. regarding ALT2: I can see people not interested in opera, who would not read ALT2 to the end because the term "opera singer" drives them away.
  2. I wrote ALT3 especially for everybody: about a person with a stamina to make whatever debut at age 59, but find it only fair to say precisely what that debut was. Critic Tim Page found him "vital and credible" in the role (of a lover loosing his girl to someone more attractive), which could be added for extra quirkiness. I think to say exactly that he sang a supporting role at the Met at that age gives him a much more precise (not vague and exaggerated) position than any "has been described" stamp. What do you think, 4meter4? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do not think you understood what 4meter4 said about people's ignorance about opera. The hooks you proposed still require being at least knowledgeable about opera, which probably 90% of Wikipedia's readership are not. The average reader will not know who or what Erik, Der fliegende Holländer, Tannhäuser, or the Teatro Massimo Bellini are. That does not mean that we cannot have hooks about things readers are unfamiliar with, but it does mean that a hook has to be easily understood or appreciated by someone unfamiliar with the topic. The point has to be easy to get even if a reader does not know the names involved. A hook about the subject being important because he performed at the Teatro Massimo Bellini, a place that maybe over 95% Wikipedia readers have never heard of, let alone know the significance of, is exactly the kind of hook that DYKINT discourages. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:18, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Basically Gerda, a good rule of thumb is this: if a hook's interestingness requires the nominator explaining why the hook fact is interesting on the nomination page, then that hook does not meet DYKINT. You having to explain ALT4 here, instead of letting the hook speak for itself, shows exactly why it is not a suitable hook. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Basically, if a hook says that someone made his debut at age 59, that is comprehensible for everybody, and even somewhat quirky. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:57, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2a: ... that Klaus König has been described as "one of the most important tenors of his generation, especially in the heroic tenor repertoire"?
ALT3a: ... that Tim Page described the debut of Klaus König at age 59 as "vital" and "credible"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Normally I might be okay with ALT3a, but review quote hooks have done poorly in the past, so it might be better to move on from it. Gerda, I think you need to be more open to hook wordings that aren't specifically your own wordings, because in many cases, the wordings you propose are not the best option. You have to accept that, sometimes, reviewers and promoters will prefer wordings by other editors and not your own, and that's okay. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:40, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd prefer ALT3a because 1) ALT2 is also a reviewer hook, 2) it's vague and exaggerated (as said before), 3) it's not credited to someone or an organization while Tim Page is a person with an article whom you can trust more, 4) it misses the quirkyness of vitality for a debut at age 59. Please try to look objectively at hooks, disregarding where they come from.
What do you think af ALT2a, in the name of "trim"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:51, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This has been a recurring thing of yours for years where you are hesitant to allow or accept hook wordings that you did not write yourself, even if the ideas came from other editors. It has to be specifically your wording, and if other editors reword or modify them, you object.
Anyway, ALT3a as written is unsuitable for multiple reasons: it is wrong (he did not debut as a performer at the age of 59, but rather as Erik). It does not even mention Erik; even if the hook was modified to an ALT3b that did mention Erik, unless a reader is familiar with the role (and to parallel what 4meter4 mentioned above, probably over 95% of our readers do not know Erik), it is not clear as to why it is a big deal that he debuted at such a role at that age. ALT2 may also be a reviewer hook, but at least it does not require the reader to be familiar with opera roles. ALT2a is not ideal because it is not clear in the hook that he is an opera singer: as 4meter4 said, even the word "tenor" is not limited to opera. Personally though, I still think that ALT1 is the best option given how it does not require any knowledge of opera to understand.
Gerda, your hooks have been questioned on interest grounds for years, so please follow the guidelines on interestingness and propose a hook that is accessible to a broad audience, or at least agree to a hook that does not require the deep expertise on opera that you have. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:20, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Another suggestion: if you want to avoid another long discussion (this discussion is already longer than the article itself), a sensible option would be to agree to ALT2 and wait for a promoter to promote it. Once the article has its run on the main page, that's it. You already said earlier in the discussion that you were fine with ALT2, so if you can just agree to it instead of continuing to object and prolonging the discussion, then König will be featured on DYK sooner rather than later. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:23, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I said earlier in the discussion that ALT2 is acceptable, which is a lot because many are not. However, it is a vague and exaggerated claim, and said so at the same time. ALT3a doesn't claim it was his debut as performer, and it wasn't as Erik (that was much earlier) but at the Met, but aren't we requested to not tell it all? Can't readers find out which debut, raising curiosity? He made some debut at 59 and was regarded as vital, that's much funnier than the general praise that says about nothing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think alt3a is misleading. The term debut is usually interpreted to mean the first professional performance by an artist in their career. It could end up at WP:ERRORS. I'm scratching it. A "house debut" is qualified through context, and a hook doesn't have space to do that. 4meter4 (talk) 17:21, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd support anything that would just bring this to promotion. @4meter4: Is ALT1 really not a suitable alternative to ALT2/ALT2a? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
no - I don't see how saying someone trained as a housepainter is interesting at all. If it was astronaut, or philosopher. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I find ALT1 really good at generating interest, and while I might not be on the same side as Narutolovehinata5 all the time, I really like their hook. Viriditas (talk) 21:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Gerda Arendt:, can you either give your approval for ALT1 to run, or withdraw the nomination. Thanks, ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I said it before: I'd rather withdraw than run ALT1. Can someone please tell me how anybody would be interested in a person who trained as a housepainter? I'd accept ALT2, or better shorter ALT2a. We talk about a person who recently died. To say no word about what made him one of the greatest, but spend characters on something he left behind early in life, seems not to do justice to him, sorry. His article had c. 5k views while on the Main page (sadly not for long). You can help him to a few more by accepting ALT2. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:31, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
information Note: I don't find ALT2 or ALT2 interesting; as DYK slots are currently under high demand, I won't be promoting them. Other promoters may disagree. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:42, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please tell me what you find interesting in ALT1, because I can't understand. Viriditas, AJ, N.? And perhaps also why you'd find it more interesting than a "vital" house debut at age 59?
ALT3b: ... that when Klaus König made his house debut at the Metropolitan Opera at age 59, Tim Page described it as "vital" and "credible"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:57, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Because it is a wonderful story. A blue collar house decorator who took evening classes when already thirty years old, and fifteen years after that became an internationally renowned performer for twenty years, while still maintaining his decorating business (not that you'd know that last bit from the article—of course he couldn't have been "proud" of something like that). As for "vital" and "credible", so meaningless I've removed it from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:45, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If I were writing this nomination, it would be something like ALT4: ... that Klaus König, who worked as a painter for over thirty years, played lead operatic roles at major venues in Vienna, London, Milan, Paris, and New York? (Paris not in the article but easily added.) ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea, thank you, but a long list of capital cities is too much quantity for my taste, and painter might be misunderstood as another Van Gogh. Better something specific perhaps?
ALT4a: ... that tenor Klaus König, who worked as a house painter for over thirty years, made his house debut at the Metropolitan Opera [in New York City] at age 59?
ALT4b: ... that Klaus König, who worked as a house painter for over thirty years, made his debut at the Royal Opera House [in London] as Wagner's Tannhäuser in 1984.
Others possible. I'd prefer ALT4b because it's a lead role, an interesting complex character, and Royal sounds good to some. By naming the role, you not only define the voice type (tenors can be so different) but also get access to an interesting story, and there's no requirement to know any of it before if reader is curious enough to explore. Will get the duration of his shop (he was the boss, - not sure that he did much painting in the 30th year) to the article. I am aware that - having to deal with Alfred Brendel (a giant) and Gorai (emotionally tough) - I neglected him a bit. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:14, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Made his debut" will typically be interpreted as "gave his first performance overall, not just at one place"; if that is what "made his house debut" is intended to address, no-one will get that. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:18, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT4c: ... that Klaus König, who worked as a house painter for over thirty years, first appeared at the Royal Opera House [in London] as Wagner's Tannhäuser in 1984.
The sources, though, use "made his debut at ...". - I found this with a lot of detail, but a blog (however educated). They cite a 1994 magazine entry that I can't find online. It could be referenced offline. What do you think. The business seems to have been Lackiererei, for cars. Not my vocabulary. Deepl suggests "car paint shop". ? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:48, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@AirshipJungleman29: Rather than listing a list of opera houses or places he performed, why not just simplify it and say that he was also an opera performer for several years? I do not think that any specific mentions of particular opera houses, places, or roles are necessary: just say that he was an opera performer, as I think that being an opera performer and a house decorator at the same time is already eye-catching as it is. Of course, this would require the part about him working both as an opera performer and as a house painter at the same time being at the article. I'm sorry, but I see ALT4a/b/c as too technical or specialist, and I agree that the original ALT4 is too complicated. The thing is: the interesting part here is that he was also a house decorator, so that has to be the focus of the hook and not whatever role he played or where he performed. We just need a simplified version of ALT4 based on above suggestion. For now, I've struck all of the current proposals as none of them seem to be viable. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 00:21, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Narutolovehinata5 was the rambling monologue intended to go anywhere, or just be unhelpful? After all, with how much you hound them, you should probably be added as a co-nominator on all of Gerda's nominations. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 06:53, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry if the above seemed like rambling. I actually liked ALT4's direction (i.e. the mentioning of both the house painter and his opera career), it's just thatt the wordings proposed were perhaps a bit too complex. The point was that the best option was probably just to say that he was both a house decorator and an opera performer, without mentioning specific roles or venues. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 07:46, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, but no, it isn't. Opera careers are different, and singing a top role (and which) at a top house (and which) is precise facts that illustrate the kind of this specific career and the voice. We could go further and add La Scala and the Paris Opera with the same role and the same year, and that's outstanding and not just "an opera career". How about you leave this nom at this point, or rather before striking what others may like? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:00, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on June 12

[edit]

Italian reserve football teams

(
)
  • Source: Article Source 1, Source 7 and Source 9
Created by Wikipediæ philosophia (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 14 past nominations.

Wikipediæ philosophia (talk) 21:34, 14 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Murder of Luigia Borrelli

(
)
Created by Moondragon21 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 15 past nominations.

Moondragon21 (talk) 05:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Dull hook. A lot of murder investigations have been reopened after long periods of time (see Murder of Sherri Rasmussen, for instance). Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Better. Just provide a source when you make it ALT1. Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: Done. Moondragon21 (talk) 05:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I meant here in the nomination, actually, but I checked it in the article and it's fine. I'd put it in the lede where you first mention it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: Now it's in the lede. Is everything alright now? Moondragon21 (talk) 02:59, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I meant in the article lede, right after that term in Italian is mentioned. Daniel Case (talk) 02:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: I think it is already. Moondragon21 (talk) 03:40, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's not. First sentence: "The murder of Luigia Borrelli, known in Italy as delitto del trapano" Right after that is where it should go. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: I am confused. What should the sentence be word-for-word? Moondragon21 (talk) 08:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I took care of it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: thanks. How is the DYK looking now? Moondragon21 (talk) 17:12, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Better in this department, but given the degree to which I have been involved already I think it better if someone else does the full review Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Thanks for the advice on the hook. Moondragon21 (talk) 11:10, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Moondragon21 your provided QPQ Template:Did you know nominations/1910 Italy v France football match is a tick-box review which did not pick up on easily-identifiable issues, and is therefore not a "full review" per WP:QPQ. I request that you review another nomination, and do so properly this time. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:19, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
apologies I reviewed that DYK before the article underwent major changes and was tagged for copyedit. AirshipJungleman29 a new QPQ is now provided. Moondragon21 (talk) 15:22, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Harris Schurmeier

(
)
Created by Artem.G (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 22 past nominations.

Artem.G (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
QPQ: Done.

Overall: The source does not refer to them as "lucky peanuts". 05:52, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Struck the main hook. Added the reference to Lucky peanuts to the appropriate spot in the article. Good to go. I would rate ALT1, 2 and 3 in that order of preference. Consider linking JPL in case not everyone knows what that is. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:30, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have returned this hook because the hook fact is based on what is likely an error in the source, given that two other sources say the tradition was started by another employee and one of them has an actual quote from said employee taking credit for it. I had hoped to substitute one of the alts above, but on reflection I don't think either of them are very interesting, and thought the nominator might like to propose something else. Gatoclass (talk) 09:27, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Gatoclass, what about ALT4: ... that when five Rangers in a row failed, JPL put Harris Schurmeier in charge with a mandate to transform the program? Johnson, Stephen B. (31 October 2006). The Secret of Apollo: Systems Management in American and European Space Programs. JHU Press. p. 103. ISBN 978-0-8018-8542-6. Artem.G (talk) 16:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on June 13

[edit]

Freddie Parker, Don King (defensive back)

( Comment or view )
( Article history links:
)
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. Nominator has 375 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:03, 20 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Bésame (Alejandro Sanz and Shakira song)

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Created by 1arch (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

1arch (talk) 16:19, 19 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article is new, long enough and well-referenced. I see no close paraphrasing issues, but neither do I see any mention of the musical influences of Alejandro Sanz and Shakira in the article. In any case, I think a hook mentioning the kiss might be more interesting. Surtsicna (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Lap

(
)
Created by CanonNi (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 15 past nominations.

'​'​'[​[User:CanonNi]​]'​'​' (💬 • ✍️) 11:56, 17 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • The article is fine, the QPQ is present, but the hook facts are missing from the article, CanonNi. They need to be in there to count as hook facts. Ping me when this has been addressed. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 19:19, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strikeout looking

(
)
Created by Soulbust (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 45 past nominations.

Soulbust (talk) 22:21, 14 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • @Soulbust: The article is new enough, long enough, cited, and has no other issues, athlough some of the prose is uncomfortable and a bit unclear. I think the hook can also be reworded for the sake of clerity for those without a baseball background, such as:
    • ALT1a...that the National Baseball Hall of Fame does not know who first used the notation '"ꓘ" to represent a strikeout looking? GGOTCC 20:57, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • @GGOTCC: Hi, thanks for the review! Which parts of the article's prose do you think is uncomfortable or unclear? I would want to take a look and adjust those bits if possible. Soulbust (talk) 07:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
        • @Soulbust: While I won't hold it against you or the DYK nomination, I was a bit confused about the line As the pitcher strikes out the batter looking in the lead section. Does this mean the pitcher and batter were looking at eachother? Would that not apply to every strikeout? My other point is that this article should be understandable to a general audience, ie. those who do not know other baseball terms. Some context in the second paragraph under "History and analysis" may help this by mentioning that a strike requires the batter to think they can strike the ball, yet fail too. This context would make a strikeout looking sound more impressive for the pitcher. GGOTCC 01:36, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha, will try and tweak those areas in a bit. The one you put in red I feel was the way it makes most sense to get a pitcher out via strikeout looking (i.e. the batter was struck out looking by the pitcher) but I think I can find a new/better way to word it. Soulbust (talk) 04:22, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doll Hut

(
)
  • Reviewed:
Created by Sewageboy (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Sewageboy (talk) 05:33, 14 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Worrall Reed Carter

(
)
Created by Hawkeye7 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 446 past nominations.

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 06:06, 13 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article looks good. Nice work. Though, to match the quote from the source, @Hawkeye7: shouldn't it be ... that Worrall Reed Carter wrote about "Beans, Bullets and Black Oil"? BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC) I have removed the quotation marks. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:52, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prescott Currier

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by Hawkeye7 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 445 past nominations.

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:11, 13 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

I think both of you might be overestimating how familiar the general public is about it, especially international readers. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 04:45, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to push back on this a bit. If you completed the entirety of your education before the 1980s and don't keep up with popular culture and don't read widely, then yes, you are correct, you probably won't know what Bletchley Park is or why it is important in fields ranging from mathematics to computing to history. So I will agree with you if we are restricting our readership to that set of people. The problem is, that's not who uses Wikipedia. Surveys show that most users of Wikipedia are between the ages of 18 and 34. Why does this matter? Because the existence of Bletchley Park was first revealed in the mid-1970s (1974?). Most people didn't hear of it until the 1990s after it opened to the public. There was a slow trickle of info in the 1980s. I think I first recall hearing about it in the late 1980s or early 1990s. With the rise of information technology by the 2000s, I would guess that it became more widely known in the tech industry, given the role of Alan Turing and the use of now-famous computers like Colossus and the codebreaking machine known as the Bombe. Around 60% of Wikipedia readers have had some form of higher education, and because most of these users are in the younger demographic, we can safely assume that the general public that uses Wikipedia is familiar with Bletchley Park because they were exposed to it after it became widely known. Nerdgasm aside, Prescott Currier worked on the goddamn Voynich manuscript. ALT0 should be passed, and frankly, that hook is awesome. Viriditas (talk) 09:03, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not yet in my 30s and I've never heard of Bletchley Park before, and I'm someone who already knows more about tech history than the average person. I think it might just be your personal bias showing, but you may be overestimating how much the average person is familiar with it. I imagine it might also be a regional thing: perhaps readers in North America or Europe may be more familiar with it than someone in Asia. But if that's the case, then pushing for it given the circumstances may be a case of systemic bias. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:25, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t see systemic bias here nor can I imagine how that term applies. I see human achievements in formerly secret, highly classified, specialized or niche domains that are now well known to people who are familiar with math, computing, and history, ideas that have reached mainstream status over time. I am more curious as to why these ideas would not be well known in your region. Viriditas (talk) 17:50, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, if your suggestion is basically "Wikipedia's audience is mostly male, of a certain age, and from the Anglosphere, and so hooks should appeal to them," then that is systemic bias. As for your second question, most of the world does not really deal with computer history in class, and the average person might not even know historical computer figures apart from Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and maybe Steve Wozniak. At least where I'm from, I don't even think the Enigma machine was ever mentioned in our history classes and I only knew about it due to watching documentaries or reading about it at the library, although it could just be a sign of how weak our educational system is over here. My point is simply that you may be overestimating how much the average person knows about Bletchley Park, especially outside the Anglosphere (or maybe even within it). At best, additional context should be added to the hook, and ideally a different direction should be used entirely. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:19, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0a: "... that Prescott Currier was one of the first group of four Americans to visit Bletchley Park, the secret British code-breaking center in World War II?" Viriditas (talk) 23:58, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's better. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:46, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's okay. Bletchely Park would would be familiar to those who have seen the movie or the other movie or the TV show, so the hook should do fine. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:26, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer needed. Z1720 (talk) 15:52, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on June 15

[edit]

Rini Widyantini

(
)
  • ... that Indonesia's current state apparatus minister, Rini Widyantini, once took care of one of her predecessors' child? Source: "In September 1970, our first child was born, and we named him Rezal Ashari... When the two of us returned to campus, we left Rezal in the charge of the Nadisah family, who very kindly agreed to babysit him. Pak Nadisah’s youngest daughter, Rini Widyantini, was the most involved in taking care of Rezal." Kusumaatmadja, Sarwono (2020). Steering a middle course: from activist to Secretary General of Golkar. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. Singapore: ISEAS. pp. 100. ISBN 978-981-4881-65-4.
5x expanded by Jeromi Mikhael (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 83 past nominations.

Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 03:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]


Articles created/expanded on June 16

[edit]

Gyula Kakas

(
)
  • ... that Gyula Kakas, who was a "small, girlish-faced boy", competed at two Olympics in gymnastics, set the Hungarian pole vault record and played for a national champion football team?
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 377 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:44, 23 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Adolph Bieberstein

(
)
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 376 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:38, 23 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Article was expanded over 5× within seven days of nomination (395 B → 5327 B; ~13.5×) and is long enough; it is now a good article as well. Article is neutral, well-cited, and contains no close paraphrasing that I could detect. Hook is broadly interesting to a wide audience. QPQ fulfilled.

Not a showstopper, but I found this source from 1928 saying that he returned to the Badgers even earlier as a coach in 1928. Maybe the article should reflect this. DigitalIceAge (talk) 03:46, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kateryna (opera)

(
)
Rodin in 2021
Rodin in 2021
Created by Максим Огородник (talk) and Gerda Arendt (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 2147 past nominations.

Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:58, 23 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Will be claiming this for review. I like ALT1 the most and I have made some minor copyedits to it, but can it be rephrased? "Production" is vague (the article states that it was the production of its costume and not the opera itself whose production had to be moved), and "its intermission" needs to refer to the premiere. ALT2 is also possible, but as a superlative hook, I'd like to see additional sources confirming ALT2 to confirm it. @GRuban: Could you copyedit or rephrase ALT1 to address the above issues? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:15, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, as this is a double nomination, two QPQs are needed instead of just one, so a second QPQ will be needed here. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:20, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
OK, though we'll be playing close to the 200 character limit here! . ALT3: "...that Ukrainian opera Kateryna by Oleksandr Rodin (pictured), had its press rehearsal delayed due to barricades, its costume production moved due to bombing, and its premiere intermission interrupted by an air raid alarm?" That makes it 194 characters because (WP:DYK200) we don't count the "..." or the "(pictured)". --GRuban (talk) 12:56, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I copyedited it a bit more. Strictly speaking, as it is a double nomination, the 200 character limit does not apply: the issue was more to do with the grammar and not the length. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:36, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Baker Park. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:13, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I like the hook idea. Please don't say "Ukrainian" opera, sounding national, - "opera in Ukrainian" would be correct, but better a link to the Odesa Opera, giving it a precise location. It could be piped but why would we not give them credit for fighting all these obstacles? Trying:
ALT3b: ... that Kateryna by Oleksandr Rodin (pictured) had its press rehearsal at the Odesa Opera delayed due to barricades, the production of 800 costumes moved due to bombing, and its premiere intermission interrupted by air raid alarm?
I fixed ALT3. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:59, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Leigh (artist)

(
)
Source: Young, Dr Fiona (2024). Finding Eva Leigh: rediscovering a Harrogate artist. York and Harrogate: North Yorkshire Council and Mercer Art Gallery. The full quotation is in the article, with inline citation.
  • ALT1: ... that, unlike traditional cut-paper silhouette artists, Eva Leigh created her own style of silhouette portraits, making meticulous drawings in India ink?
Source: as above.
    • Reviewed: Skraban–Deardorff syndrome
    • Comment: The expansion is already new enough and long enough, and mostly complete, but I'm still improving it (nominating now, to avoid deadline issues). I'll post here, when it's ready for review. Thank you for your patience. Update: the article is now ready for review.
5x expanded by Storye book (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 115 past nominations.

Storye book (talk) 08:50, 20 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

I dispute the above summary dismissal. With respect to WP:ARTIST:
a. The artist has been mentioned by newspapers, the Mercer Art Gallery, online sources, and a booklet by Dr Fiona Young.
b. The artist created a new and significant technique of creating portrait silhouettes.
c. The artist created a body of work which has been described by the above sources.
d. The artist's work was shown in an exhibition at a respected gallery, and the exhibition was under her own name (I.e. it was all her own work).
e. The artist's work is in two collections: one owned by the Mercer Art Gallery, and the other in the collection of Herbert Bannister Whone, who himself deserves a biography. That collection is currently being retained by his family.
With respect to Ancestry:
f. That is not about genealogy. Ancestry is one way of accessing authoritative government and public institution documents. They could equally well be accessed at public archives, libraries, etc. but Ancestry allows us to provide links, so that the documents can also be checked by those millions of readers who have subscriptions to Ancestry. If one makes statements about an individual, then those statements have to be proved. What better way of proving something than by a verifiable government document? All the Ancestry material is verifiable and above-board. Also, in biographies it is always helpful to an understanding of where the subject's achievement came from (or whether the subject achieved things against the odds) by describing their family background etc. That may not always be the case in modern America where family history and background may not always count, but it is certainly always the case in historical biographies of British people, where class, education, money etc. historically made all the difference. Storye book (talk) 08:03, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They would pass 4b as they were the subject of the Mercer Art Gallery exhibition. The article needs more reliable sources that mention the subject. The mention of her great grandfather is not necessary. It does not seem like there are any sources that mention her descent from her great grandfather and it seems as if it is original research. Aneirinn (talk) 04:20, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing wrong with the sources.
  • We have newspapers, a book and a gallery as sources.
  • Also your WP:ARTIST link says that only one of the requirements has to be met, whereas the article meets all or part of each requirement.
  • We are asked to produce more articles about women because historically they have been ignored or forgotten. Being ignored or forgotten means that they will have fewer sources than the traditionally lionised old white men.
Please get real about this. Rules exist primarily on WP to prevent editors from breaking the law. No law has been broken in this article. WP rules exist secondarily to ensure that inappropriate material and lies are not represented here. It is clear that there is no inappropriateness or lying in this article, and those secondary rules about decency should be used with common sense. Storye book (talk) 08:34, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Chennai Super Kings season

(
)
Improved to Good Article status by Vestrian24Bio (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Vestrian24Bio 16:05, 17 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • This is a comment and not a review: I have mixed feelings about this hook. On the one hand, the hook is borderline specialist since it requires knowledge that the Super Kings are usually good. On the other hand, the IPL is a huge deal in India, a country of over 1 billion people. This is a weird case in that I'm not actually sure if the hook as currently written is interesting to a broad audience, as whether or not it does depends on how you define "broad". On the one hand, cricket is really only popular in a relatively small number of countries, so outside of those countries the hook may not be as interesting. On the other hand, three of the countries where cricket is big (India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh) are very populous, so in theory the number of people this hook attracts is very large. It's a question of how wide the hook's interest is versus how deep. I don't swing either way (although I'd be leaning more towards it being interesting), so it would be good to ask for a second opinion here, ideally from a non-cricket fan. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some extra hooks, which are hopefully more interesting (link placement may need some adjusting):
The last one requires a source from the team's main article as well. It cites [4], which should do. Toadspike [Talk] 12:00, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think ALT3 would be the best option here, although of course the article would need adjustment. @Vestrian24Bio: Thoughts on the above proposals? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:49, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Narutolovehinata5 and Toadspike: I support ALT3 as well and also made the necessary changes to the article now. Vestrian24Bio 13:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 17

[edit]

Apolonia Dorregaray Veli

(
)
Created by MumphingSquirrel (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

MumphingSquirrel (talk) 13:28, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • I am afraid I have some problems with the sources, MumphingSquirrel. References #1 and #4 are blogs. References #2, #5, #9, #10, #11 and #12 are offline sources the existence of which I cannot verify online. #6 looks splendid–but does not mention the subject of the article. #7 is again a blog but the article published there is purported to have been first published by the Instituto Nacional de Cultura of the Museo Nacional de la Cultura Peruana, and I was able to find a reference to this article on a credible website. Reference #8 is the aforementioned credible website. Reference #9 is another credible website that mentions the subject. The source cited for the hook does not, as far as I can tell, verify the hook; I do not see the age of the art form mentioned anywhere, and the source is cited in the article is another source, the aforementioned #5. Is it possible to swap the blogs for more reliable sources? And is it possible to cite an accessible source that verifies the hook? Surtsicna (talk) 17:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Surtsicna, thanks for the feedback. I'm unexpectedly away from home with a family thing of unspecified timescale, so will struggle to look at this properly for at least a week or so. Will pick it up when I'm back home. MumphingSquirrel (talk) 21:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Lazhari

(
)
5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 34 past nominations.

Arconning (talk) 17:11, 24 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Canons Regular of St. John Cantius

(
)
Converted from a redirect by Darth Stabro (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 43 past nominations.

~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 15:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Articles created/expanded on June 18

[edit]

Don Summers

(
)
  • Source: GB Press Gazette ("He hadn't caught a pass or lifted a barbell in 402 days")
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 379 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:44, 25 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Robert Baker Park

(
)
  • ... that Robert Baker Park in Baltimore was named after Robert Lewis Baker, whose personal Federal Hill townhouse garden was recreated at the city's Flower and Garden Show the year after his 1979 death?
  • Source: "Actually, Mr. Tag ls responsible for three major displays. In addition to the
one mentioned, his company, Manor landscaping, is planning a comparative study of two small city gardens, one formal, the other informal. For his third undertaking. he is helping the Horticulture Society of Maryland with their project, which is a reproduction of the late Dr, Robert L. Baker’s townhouse garden." Baltimore Sun, March 8, 1980
Created by 842U (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 11 past nominations.

842U (talk) 19:16, 23 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Interesting park and person after whom it's named, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. Thank you for nominating and qpq, 842U! - The hook is a bit long for my taste, we should raise curiosity, and I think it's enough to know that it's named after someone whose garden was recreated. I don't need the Federal Hill link, nor the year, nor that he died, and not even that it was the year after he died, to get interested in reading more. Please try trimming, or others will do it for you ;) - Please check the article again: it's well referenced overall, but at least one quote and one paragraph lack a ref at the end. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Newnham

(
)

CricketArchive is an alternative, but is paywalled Cricket: as above, or his Wisden obituary also verifies – https://www.espncricinfo.com/wisdenalmanack/content/story/229835.html Moscow: Victoria Cross Online – https://victoriacrossonline.co.uk/lanceray-arthur-newnham-gc-mc-direct-recipient/

Transcriptions of Indian newspapers also suggest this, but don't flat out say it
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: Think this is OK. If the sourcing for serving as a military attache is not OK, we have two Indian newspapers which say he was with the Bombay Staff Corps in Moscow when he was married so an alternative ending along the lines of ...and was married in Moscow might be possible
5x expanded by Blue Square Thing (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Blue Square Thing (talk) 05:44, 22 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Ophicleide

(
)
Ophicleide in C by Gautrot with nine keys, mid-19th century
Ophicleide in C by Gautrot with nine keys, mid-19th century
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: I'm not sure if the bit in parentheses may or may not be needed; almost nobody will know what an ophicleide is, but then that's what DYK is about, I guess?
Improved to Good Article status by Jonathanischoice (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Jon (talk) 17:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

ALT1: ... that the ophicleide (pictured) was used in early British brass bands in the 19th century before being replaced by the euphonium? Source: Yeo, Douglas (2021). "ophicleide". An Illustrated Dictionary for the Modern Trombone, Tuba, and Euphonium Player. Dictionaries for the Modern Musician. Peterson, Lennie (illustrator). Lanham: The Globe Pequot Publishing Group. p. 99. ISBN 978-1-538-15966-8. LCCN 2021020757. OCLC 1249799159. OL 34132790M. Wikidata Q111040546.

François-Edmond Fortier

(
)
Woman from the Fula ethnic group
Woman from the Fula ethnic group
  • ... that François-Edmond Fortier published over 3,300 postcards of French West Africa (example pictured) between 1901 and 1920? Source: Ref 3: Geary, Christraud M. (2018). "Between 1901 and 1912 he issued more 3.300 original postcards, which he reproduced in different editions until 1920..
    • ALT1: ... that in the early 1900s François-Edmond Fortier published many postcards with eroticized depictions of African women? Source: Ref Ref 3: Geary, Christraud M. (2018). "Included among his cards are many exotic or erotic pictures of "colonized" women..."
    • ALT2: ... that Pablo Picasso owned 40 photographs by François-Edmond Fortier that may have influenced his painting Les Demoiselles d'Avignon? Source: Hirsch, Robert (8 February 2024). Seizing the Light: A Social & Aesthetic History of Photography. Taylor & Francis. p. 255. ISBN 978-1-000-90432-1.
    • ALT3: ... that a photograph by François-Edmond Fortier (pictured) has become an iconic image of African resistance against colonial rule? Source: Bertho, Elara (1 June 2018). "Photographies de Samori Touré : de la carte postale coloniale aux pochettes de vinyles". Cahiers d'études africaines (in French) (230): 301–322. doi:10.4000/etudesafricaines.22087. ISSN 0008-0055. Translation: Photographs of Samori Touré: From the Colonial Postcard to Record Covers. Circulations of an Iconic Picture
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Vorlesungen über die Entwicklung der Mathematik im 19. Jahrhundert
    • Comment: Article 5x expanded. The picture of the Fula woman is only meant for ALT0. In case we use ALT3, another image is appropriate: File:Samory-Dioula Soudanais (AOF).jpg
Created by Munfarid1 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 35 past nominations.

Munfarid1 (talk) 08:34, 19 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Fine expansion of an interesting bio, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. Of the hooks, I like ALT2 best, - would there be an associated image example? Same as ALT0 perhaps? That image is licensed and a good illustration. I like ALT3 also, but it seems a bit off his normal images. The example image is also licensed and a good illustration. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:17, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Death (Marvel Cinematic Universe)

(
)
  • ... that the character of Death had already been cast for the Marvel Cinematic Universe when a culture website suggested she would never make an appearance?
    • ALT1: ... that Death in the Marvel Cinematic Universe has created Infinity Stones and flowers?
    • ALT2: ... that Death was described as a witch on a motorcycle?
    • ALT3: ... that Death can speak Spanish?
    • ALT4: ... that Aubrey Plaza spent months learning to play the drums before playing Death?
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani
    • Comment: Two hooks about the creation of the character - can probably come up with more 'serious' ones - and some more quirky hooks. Use whatever's needed in a set, and feel free to suggest more. (QPQ may appear used: there were three articles reviewed at that nom and this should be 3/3.) If we're still doing special occasion hooks, the show's one year anniversary would be September 18 - or, if using alt4, Plaza's birthday is June 26, though I appreciate that's only a week away.
Converted from a redirect by Kingsif (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 139 past nominations.

Kingsif (talk) 03:56, 18 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Oh I missed that, sorry! BuySomeApples (talk) 21:54, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on June 19

[edit]

Supreme state organ of power

(
)
  • Source: Towster, Julian (1948). Political Power in the U.S.S.R.: 1917−1947. Oxford University Press. 212; Gasper, Donald (1982). "The Chinese National People's Congress". In Nelson, Daniel; White, Stephen (eds.). Communist Legislatures in Comparative Perspective. State University of New York Press. pp. 160–190. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-06086-3_7. ISBN 0-87395-566-8. 171.
5x expanded by TheUzbek (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

TheUzbek (talk) 10:14, 26 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

George Garcia

(
)
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bob Wicks
  • Comment: Will complete QPQ within the weekend. What's novel here is while election commission officials vote all the time in general elections, and while there are several special/by-elections, it's not often that a special/by-election happens on the district where an electoral commission is a voter on.
5x expanded by Howard the Duck (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 27 past nominations.

Howard the Duck (talk) 11:54, 20 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • I'm honestly not a fan of hooks that require the nominator to explain its importance or interestingness in the nomination. DYKINT suggests that hooks need to be interesting to non-specialist audiences, meaning the hook should be more-or-less self-evident without requiring too much knowledge. Do you have any other suggestions? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:46, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I mean special/by-elections rather important in many places, and for someone who administers elections to personally vote on one must be rare.
    Other facts are that he counseled for politicians before becoming involved with the Commission on Elections but I thought that's boring. Howard the Duck (talk) 10:51, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It still feels like specialist information at best. It's probably better to just go in a different direction, if possible. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:53, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
By-elections are standard fare in English speaking countries. This is not specialist at all. Such elections are standard fare on WP:DYK.
Also some other facts are unsavory and may not pass WP:BLP more so on the Main Page. Howard the Duck (talk) 11:02, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Four-Phase Systems AL1

(
)
  • ... that the AL1 ended Texas Instruments' claims that they had invented the first microprocessor? Source: the lawsuit computer report
    • ALT1: ... that when Lee Boysel wanted to prove his AL1 microprocessor pre-dated Intel and TI to be the first microprocessor, he built a computer using one packed into Nintendo Entertainment System cartridges? Source: Laws, in turn based on the presentation, NES from the court document
    • Reviewed: Redhill MRT station
    • Comment: I'm not entirely happy with either hook, so if anyone has suggestions... I do think the NES carts would definitely be hooky though!
Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 205 past nominations.

Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:41, 19 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Per rule 5 of the DYK rules, could you link or quote the exact document you are citing? If this is a primary source, that may also be an issue. GGOTCC 19:51, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All of these are found in Hertz, CHM, " Defending his work in court, Boysel showed that the AL1 could operate as a standalone microprocessor, effectively establishing it as "prior art," predating the TMX 1795" The carts are only mentioned in Boysel by name, but can be seen in Hertz. No idea why I typed Laws, that's the other CHM document. Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AHOF

(
)
  • ... that the K-pop group AHOF was formed through Universe League with seven members from the winning team and one top-voted contestant from each of the two losing teams?
  • Source: ファイナルマッチ前には、1位チームに属する7人、2位チームのファン投票1位のメンバー、3位チームのファン投票1位のメンバーの9人でのデビューとなることが明かされた。Rough translation: Before the final match, it was revealed that the debut lineup would consist of nine members: 7 from the first-place team, the top-ranked member in fan voting from the second-place team, and the top-ranked member from the third-place team. Oricon News
  • ALT1: ... that AHOF, a K-pop group formed through Universe League, includes the top-voted contestants from two losing teams alongside the seven-member winning team? Source: Oricon News
  • Reviewed:
Moved to mainspace by Eugh jei (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

— Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 14:43, 19 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Hello! I'll be more than happy to review this. Article was nominated within 7 days of moving to mainspace. It is more than 1,500 words in prose and sourced. Nominator has less than 5 nominations, so a QPQ is not needed at this time. I do have concerns about the line about the Dazed photoshoot, as the inclusion of their interview seems promotional since the quoted text is more aspirational than about their activities. Furthermore, while I can understand the hook, it's worded a little bit confusingly and might only appeal to niche audiences. Can you suggest another hook? lullabying (talk) 07:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lullabying: Thank you for the review! Would this work: ALT2 "... that AHOF, a K-pop group formed on the reality show Universe League, includes two members who were not on the winning team but were added by fan votes?" I know I'm just rephrasing the hooks I suggested above. I wanted to showcase the fact that two members, despite being in the losing teams, were added in. I'm not sure if you are looking for a totally different hook. Regarding the Dazed Korea line, I had that line as a placeholder to hopefully expand it later when I get a copy of the magazine. For now, I will remove it, and once I get to read the magazine article and found notable info, I'd put it back in. — Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 10:02, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I think the reworded hook is fine. The Dazed line is still on the article. lullabying (talk) 18:04, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, one more thing I need to add: I'm not sure if this article satisfies WP:Notability (music) because this band is so new. Yes, there's independent coverage, but a lot of it has to do with Universe League rather than the group themselves. lullabying (talk) 19:56, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. And funny thing about that, I hoped to move the article from the draftspace to the mainspace after the group's debut and after substantial group activities. But then it got moved by someone and so this request got expedited as well. (I know it said above that I was the one who moved it. I was just not aware how the DYK Wizard worked. I thought that that field was for the users requesting, but I digress.) There had been a recent performance, and details about their upcoming EP had come out. I could add this to the article to hopefully satisfy WP:NMG. — Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 22:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I really am hoping for this article to pass DYK, but at the moment, it's kind of hard to say whether it satisfies notability. From what I can see, the EP hasn't released yet and charting information is unavailable. lullabying (talk) 04:13, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I guess the course of action is to actively edit the article. I am optimistic that the article will satisfy WP:NMG before WP:DYKTIMEOUT happens. thank you for the feedback! — Eugh jei (talk) 11:22, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will continue to check occasionally, but please let me know once you have made the change to satisfy notability. Thanks! lullabying (talk) 01:45, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Articles created/expanded on June 20

[edit]

Matt Koart

(
)
  • ... that American football player Matt Koart, considered small for his position, added over 40 pounds (18 kg) in college by "stuff[ing] myself so bad"?
  • Source: LA Times (archived to avoid paywall - "Koart came to USC as a freshman in 1981 weighing 217 pounds. That’s a reasonable weight for a fullback, but not a defensive tackle ...'I used to stuff myself so bad,' he said. 'I'd take a weight-gaining powder, put two bananas in it, grind it up and then shove it down my throat--2,000 calories. And that was after I ate.' ... Koart weighs 260 pounds and is a mainstay of USC’s experienced defensive line")
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 382 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:00, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Fred Shirey

(
)
  • ... that it took a two-year "campaign" from future NFL player Fred Shirey, his friends and coaches for Shirey's father to even allow him to try out football?
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 381 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 22:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Philippe Housiaux

(
)
5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 40 past nominations.

Arconning (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Wilf Pine

(
)
  • Source:Butler, Geezer (2023). Into the Void: From Birth to Black Sabbath and Beyond. HarperCollins.
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: Please feature on 5 July, the day of the last-ever Black Sabbath gig.
    • Created by Ericoides (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    Ericoides (talk) 12:28, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Ahmed Hamada

    (
    )
    • ... that Ahmed Hamada was part of the first Bahraini Olympic team and later became the first Bahraini gold medalist at the Asian Games?
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 36 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 05:29, 26 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Potomac-class frigate

    (
    )
    USS Sabine, which took nearly 40 years to finish
    USS Sabine, which took nearly 40 years to finish
    • ... that the Potomac-class frigates (example pictured) were intentionally built slowly for the sake of quality, only for the last ships to be outdated by the time they were finished decades later?
    • Source: "The Navy built these ships slowly and carefully, completing the frigates when they were needed for active service...Designed as a class, the ships varied significantly between the first launched craft and the last - reflecting 30 years of progress in naval architecture...The final ships completed, the Santee and Sabine, were obsolete when launched...

    Sabine: Laid down: 1823....Commissioned: 8 June 1861"

    Quotes from pages 13 and 40 of American Heavy Frigates 1794-1826 by by Mark Lardas and Tony Bryan
    Created by GGOTCC (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

    GGOTCC 02:12, 21 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 21

    [edit]

    Verona Marjanović

    (
    )
    • ... that luger Verona Marjanović had to run through an airport while bullets were being fired to train in Germany?
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 41 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 14:39, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Phyllis Edness

    (
    )
    • ... that Phyllis and Phyllis competed for Bermuda at the 1948 Summer Olympics?
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk) and It is a wonderful world (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. Nominator has 39 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 04:16, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Sangay Tenzin

    (
    )
    • ... that swimmer Sangay Tenzin started swimming in rivers at the age of three?
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 37 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 05:34, 26 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Kathleen O'Melia

    (
    )
    Created by Voorts (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 12 past nominations.

    voorts (talk/contributions) 03:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Strong Court

    (
    )
    • Source: "Effective leadership of the Court was, at least at times, passing from Strong's hands" (Snell and Vaughan, 1985, p 62). "Henry Strong seemed to dominate the court, and under his leadership, or lack thereof, the court spiralled downward in the estimation of both the bar and the public." (Ian Bushnell, 1992, p 168)
    "The attempts to force retirement, the repeated absences of several justices, and the problems caused by Chief Justice Strong's personality naturally resulted in instability on the Court." (Snell and Vaughan, 1985, p 58).
      • ALT1: ... that the Strong Court was created by the appointment of Samuel Henry Strong to the role of Chief Justice of Canada, despite Strong's many attempts to resign from the Court? Source: "Several times between 1884 and 1888 Strong actually tendered his resignation. He had stayed on at the prime minister's request, but in 1888 Sir John A. Macdonald finally gave way, writing to the minister of justice: 'I have written Strong. You would grant his pension. He may as well go.' Strong did not go, however." (Snell and Vaughan, 1985, p 45)
      • ALT2: ... that despite its name, the Strong Court did not have the respect of the Canadian legal community or public? Source: "Equally unfortunate was the entrenchment of the public's generally negative perception of the institution. A Toronto law journal commented in 1896 that 'this Court has long lacked the confidence of the Bar, both in the English-speaking provinces and in Quebec, and the present state of affairs will minimize what confidence still exists." AND "The Court's reputation remained poor; the editor of the Canada Law Journal wrote privately that the Supreme Court 'is held in Contempt by the profession.'"(Snell and Vaughan, 1985, p 58, 79)
      • Reviewed:
      • Comment: I think the name of the court can be used to make a good pun, but I am having difficulty thinking of one
    Created by Caddyshack01 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    Caddyshack01 (talk) 14:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    SWAT (Regina)

    (
    )
    • Source: According to research conducted by Sam Alvaro for a Carleton University thesis, less than 2% of Canadian police department adopt the SWAT name. The majority of police tactical units in other departments use names such as Emergency Response Team, Emergency Response Unit, Emergency Task Force, Emergency Services Unit and Groupe d'intervention (English: Intervention Group). Linked paper.
    Created by Ominae (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.

    Ominae (talk) 14:13, 21 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 22

    [edit]

    Charles Champaud

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 42 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 03:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Isoup Ganthy

    (
    )
    • ... that Isoup Ganthy, part of Cambodia's first Olympic team, later died in prison after being accused of working to overthrow the country?
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 35 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 04:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Letard II

    (
    )
    • ... that Archbishop Letard II of Nazareth was one of only a few fellow bishops about whom William of Tyre had something nice to say?
    • Source: "William had positive things to say about very few of the bishops whose periods of office overlapped with his own. Archbishop Letard of Nazareth (1158-90), who by the 1180s was the longest serving bishop in the patriarchate of Jerusalem, was 'a very pleasant man, affable and kindly.'" (Edbury 94)
    • ALT1: ... that Archbishop Letard II of Nazareth complained to the pope that Muslims carrying off peasants was causing him financial difficulties? Source:
      "the archbishop and his canons claimed that the damage caused to the defence system of the kingdom had enabled Muslim troops to raid Christian territory, and that ... many of the peasants had been carried off as prisoners by the raiders, and consequently the church of Nazareth had suffered such a huge loss of revenue that the canons were experiencing difficulty in carrying out their liturgical duties. This complaint was addressed to Alexander III..." (Hamilton & Jotischky 2020, p. 118.)
    • ALT2: ... that Pope Urban III appointed a Letard to act as a judge delegate? Source: (Hamilton & Jotischky 2020, p. 119.)
    • Reviewed: Kamla Jaan
    • Comment: ALT2 is only there because I could not resist.
    Created by Surtsicna (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 224 past nominations.

    Surtsicna (talk) 22:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Danan: The Jungle Fighter

    (
    )
    Improved to Good Article status by CooperCool23 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    COOPER COOL 23 user page 22:16, 22 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Saskatchewan Highway Patrol

    (
    )
    • ... that the Saskatchewan Highway Patrol was in a controversy in 2020 where firearms were purchased, but were deemed questionable during an audit in 2019?
    Converted from a redirect by Ominae (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 19 past nominations.

    Ominae (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Yang Xianjin

    (
    )
    • ... that in August 2021, Yang re-entered the education sector as Party Secretary of Tianjin University, where he supervises all Party-related matters of the institution?
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: This is my fist nomination-forgive me if I made a mistake?
    Created by PawPatroler (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    PawPatroler (talk) 05:12, 22 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

    Hook eligibility:

    • Cited: Yes
    • Interesting: No - n
    • Other problems: No - The hook is not properly formatted; Yang's full name or suitable replacement text should be used and in bold, and it should be wikilinked in Yang Xianjin's article.
    QPQ: None required.

    Overall: The hook is uninteresting. It provides no context for who Yang is or why anyone would care that he re-entered the education sector. It reads like a line on a resume, not a hook that grabs readers' interest. Please look for a different hook option in the article or in sources that could be added to the article, and ping me when updated so I can review. Update: After leaving open for a week, there has been no update and the hook does not meet the DYK criteria. Closing as a "no". Any reviewer who would like to revive this is welcome to update and re-review. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:44, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    At 25:00, in Akasaka

    (
    )
    • ... that the creator of At 25:00, in Akasaka rode on an ambulance for the first time while writing the second volume?
    • Source: Chil Chil [ja] (link): "――執筆中の思い出に残る日常エピソードなどうかがえますでしょうか / 多分初めて救急車に乗りました。今はまったくなんともないのですがめちゃめちゃ健康の大切さを実感しました。[Please share a lasting memory from your daily life during your writing process. / That might be me riding an ambulance for the first time. Right now, it's nothing really serious, but I realized how very important it is to take care of my health.]"
    Created by Lullabying (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 69 past nominations.

    lullabying (talk) 20:04, 22 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Created yesterday and it's already at 6111 B in prose size. Everything else is good. ミラP@Miraclepine 03:13, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • Pulled per DYKINT. Nobody cares about the author's ride in an ambulance. Please try to come up with something a little more interesting and pertinent to the subject, thanks. Gatoclass (talk) 10:14, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Gatoclass: Well, I did find it a little unusual and was open to this possibility. After all, what also helps is that the creator is unlikely to have a standalone article. However, I'm busy atm and will be until Thursday, so in case this is not enough, I had drafted these more-interesting hooks in advance since there might not be time to debate ALT0's interestingness:
    ALT1A: ... that the creator of At 25:00, in Akasaka found that depicting television scripts gave her "a little more atmosphere" in writing dialogue than in other manga? 苦労した点、また楽しかった点など聞かせてください ... ドラマの台本だから！ と思って普段自分の漫画で使うセリフより少し雰囲気のあるセリフを選んで描けたのは面白かったです。/Please tell us about the things you struggled with and the things you enjoyed. ... It was interesting that I was able to choose lines that had a little more atmosphere than the ones I usually use in my manga because it was a drama script. Television's not stated per se but it's obvious from the work's plot.
    ALT1B: ... that the creator of At 25:00, in Akasaka found that depicting drama scripts gave her "a little more atmosphere" in writing dialogue than in other manga? Same as ALT1A
    ALT2A: ... that the two stars of At 25:00, in Akasaka found it challenging to portray themselves as actors who "act within a show"? 俳優の役を演じるという、いわゆる二重構造についてはどういう印象を受けましたか？/What was your impression of the so-called double structure of playing the role of an actor? [Niihara and Komagine reply that acting as actors was challenging.
    ALT2B: ... that the two stars of the television drama At 25:00, in Akasaka found it challenging to portray themselves as actors who "act within a show"? Same as ALT2A
    ミラP@Miraclepine 01:40, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 23

    [edit]

    Beautiful Chaos (EP)

    (
    )
    Moved to mainspace by Orangesclub (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 307 past nominations.

    Launchballer 21:31, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    A Balloon in Mid-Air

    (
    )
    1875 painting
    1875 painting
    • ... that A Balloon in Mid-Air depicts a flight over the San Francisco Bay Area by artist Jules Tavernier with aeronaut Étienne Buislay, who died in a balloon accident a week later?
      • Sources: Chalmers, Claudine (2013). Chronicling the West for Harper's: Coast to Coast with Frenzeny & Tavernier in 1873–1874. University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 196-197. ISBN 9780806143767. OCLC 830992700. Quote: "The Frenchmen [Tavernier and Frenzeny] went up again on another ascension on October 4, with the very same reckless French aeronaut [Étienne Buislay]. That balloon ride was successful although the balloon was blown over to the East Bay. Tavernier drew, from these October adventures into the volatile San Francisco skies, fresh inspiration for what became his very first painting in San Francisco." See also: "Ballooning". Daily Alta California. 26 (8952). October 5, 1874; Crouch, Tom D. (1983). The Eagle Aloft: Two Centuries of the Balloon in America. Smithsonian Institution Press. pp. 425-426, 475. ISBN 9780874743463. OCLC 9827066. Quote: "San Francisco witnessed several balloon disasters during the 1870s. Joseph Gruet ("Etienne Buislay"), who had flown with James Allen during that aeronaut's short stay in the city, died, it will be recalled, in a [balloon accident]...on October 11,1874...[he became] tangled in some dangling lines [and] fell onto the rocks of Bernal Heights...he died several days later." Additional note: Amateur historian Woody LaBounty provides a unified account of both on his "San Francisco Story" blog, which is a great read, but has a lot of unusual info that appears to diverge from all the other sources, such as his claim that Étienne Buislay is someone else entirely. I suspect these are just simple errors, not an alternative theory. Final note: For some reason, most of these sources refer to the balloon as a hot-air balloon rather than the gas balloon that it is. I don't understand this error, especially coming from aviation historian Tom D. Crouch. Perhaps the term "hot air balloon" is shorthand for all balloons, gas or otherwise?
      • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mykola Chaikovsky; Template:Did you know nominations/Deportation and detention of American citizens in the second Trump administration
    Created by Viriditas (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 42 past nominations.

    Viriditas (talk) 00:51, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Football at the 2015 Island Games – Women's tournament

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 45 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 10:23, 28 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Ahmed Issa

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 43 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 03:53, 28 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Westhope

    (
    )
    Westhope
    Westhope
    5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 732 past nominations.

    Epicgenius (talk) 03:18, 25 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    S-1 (supercomputer)

    (
    )
    • ... that the S-1 supercomputer was designed to have 16 processors, each with the power of a Cray-1? Source: statement made in both Stump and abstract of Widdoes
      • ALT1: ... that the S-1 project was designed with the ultimate goal of building an entire supercomputer on a single silicon wafer? Source: MacKenzie 1998, p. 120.
    Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 206 past nominations.

    Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Arielle Prepetit

    (
    )
    Created by DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 14 past nominations.

    DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 11:01, 23 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]


    Current nominations

    [edit]

    Articles created/expanded on June 24

    [edit]

    Bernardo de la Guardia

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 49 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 08:23, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Henri Elendé

    (
    )
    • ... that at the 1964 Summer Olympics, high jumper Henri Elendé placed first in the qualifiers and placed last in the finals?
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 47 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 12:34, 29 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Emirto de Lima

    (
    )
    • ... that Dutch composer Emirto de Lima competed for Colombia at the 1932 Summer Olympics?
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 46 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 12:29, 29 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Juan Bascuñán

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 44 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 10:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    João Barrento

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Kingsif (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 140 past nominations.

    Kingsif (talk) 11:52, 25 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

    Hook eligibility:

    • Cited: Yes
    • Interesting: Yes
    • Other problems: No - see below
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Nice AFD rescue. The article looks good, but the hook doesn't appear to be explicitly mentioned in the article (it isn't mentioned that he was a teenager when he started competing in horse riding nor is it stated that he was in his 40s when he competed at the Olympics). I think it will need to be specified in the article in order for it to work as a hook. This will also have to wait till the AFD finishes. BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:34, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Paul R. Anderson, Hurst Robins Anderson

    ( Comment or view )
    ( Article history links:
    )
    5x expanded by PCN02WPS (talk). Number of QPQs required: 2. Nominator has 92 past nominations.

    PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:33, 25 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]


    Articles created/expanded on June 25

    [edit]

    Charles Winckler

    (
    )
    • ... that Charles Winckler was selected to the Olympics in swimming, track and field, and won a gold medal in tug of war?
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 53 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 13:49, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    LuLu the Piggy

    (
    )
    LuLu the Piggy at the left corner
    LuLu the Piggy at the left corner
    • Source: "Siam Discovery collaborates with the popular art toy LuLu the Piggy to launch Thailand’s first pop-up store, offering exclusive merchandise and experiences from July 5 to August 31, 2024. Siam Discovery The Exploratorium amplifies its positioning as ‘The Biggest Arena of Lifestyle Experiments’ that offers thrilling and exciting experiences where everyone can endlessly Experiment, Create, and Cultivate. Siam Discovery collaborates with the sought-after art toy characters LuLu the Piggy to launch Thailand’s first pop-up store "LuLu the Piggy – Stay with you Bangkok." Making its debut in Thailand, this exclusive pop-up store caters to the growing art toy lover community, underlying Siam Discovery’s "Be the first" commitment. Collectors can now shop their favourite LuLu the Piggy items in Bangkok, thanks to Siam Discovery and Toyzero+, from 5 July to 31 August 2024, on the 1st floor of Siam Discovery." Bangkok Post
    • Reviewed:
    Created by ChiJap (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    ChiJap (talk) 11:00, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • The proposed hook is demonstrably false. The source is only saying that it's the first Lulu pop-up store in Thailand, and it's a press release and wouldn't be adequate for such claims anyway. Indeed, the article is cited only to primary sources and press releases; it will need references to independent reliable sources to show notability. The article is missing an important contextual link to art toy in the opening sentence, and the "Characteristic" section fails to frame the description in a real-world perspective. The image copyright might be an issue, as it appears to be a temporary rather than permanent installation so it's unclear whether FOP actually applies. A QPQ review is also needed, as nominator has more than 5 DYKs under another account. Other than that, article is new and long enough. I'm going to fail this as the article needs significant rewriting to properly present the subject's real-world significance, not just its marketing material. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:35, 1 July 2025 (UTC), updated 09:27, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Karel Frankenstein

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 51 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 08:31, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Hermann Weiland

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 50 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 08:28, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Mule (wanderer)

    (
    )
    • ... that a nomad known as "Mule" sued to protect the "sacred relationship between man and horse to travel together with reverence and respect for this beautiful place in which we all reside called Earth"?
    • Source: "An activist and wanderer known across California as “Mule Man” says the CHP violated his right to intrastate roadside travel and his “ages-old nomadic way of life” when he was arrested near Paso Robles in 2020.

    The complaint says that Sears seeks to “protect this ages-old nomadic way of life and the sacred relationship between man and horse to travel together with reverence and respect for this beautiful place in which we all reside called Earth.”"

    The Tribune
    Created by Thriley (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 177 past nominations.

    Thriley (talk) 14:43, 29 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

    Hook eligibility:

    • Cited: Yes
    • Interesting: Yes
    • Other problems: No - minor
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Looks mostly good. My main concern is that the full quote does not appear in the article, only a portion of it, and there's two bare URLs. Also, is he "Mule" or "Mule Man" like the source says? Add the quote, fix the refs and it should be good to go. @Thriley: BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:56, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Erika Jonn

    (
    )
    Farm in Skåne by Erika Jonn held in Sweden's Nationalmuseum
    Farm in Skåne by Erika Jonn held in Sweden's Nationalmuseum
    • ... that although artist Erika Jonn did not have an exhibition of her work in her native Sweden in her lifetime, the Nationalmuseum in Stockholm now holds her painting "Farm in Skåne"?
    Created by MumphingSquirrel (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 7 past nominations.

    MumphingSquirrel (talk) 21:12, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Suja Khondokar

    (
    )
    Created by FaysaLBinDaruL (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 8 past nominations.

    ~ Φαϊσάλ (talk) 13:56, 26 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    HMS Unicorn (1776)

    (
    )
    • ... that the HMS Unicorn was decommissioned in August 1779, but was recommissioned the following month (September 1779)?
    • Reviewed:
    Created by Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 00:06, 26 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]


    General: Article is new enough and long enough

    Policy compliance:

    • Adequate sourcing: No - History section has unreferenced facts. Service in the American Revolutionary War section has a bulleted list with only one entry referenced. The paragraph introducing the list is also unreferenced, and there is a random reference floating after the list. First paragraph in After service in the American Revolution section is unreferenced. Infobox also has lots of facts not referenced in the infobox nor mentioned/referenced in text
    • Neutral: Yes
    • Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: Yes

    Hook eligibility:

    • Cited: No - DYK info is in the article but has no reference
    • Interesting: No - I think the hook could be made interesting if it included the reason why the ship was recommissioned. Without this reason, I don't think it is interesting enough.
    • Other problems: No - mentioning September 1779 is unnecessary, readers will know what month follows August 1779
    QPQ: None required.

    Overall: DYK nomination needs work but more significantly, I think the article itself is not in the proper shape for a DYK. Particularly, the lack of references and the improper formatting of the references the article does have, both of these issues are problematic. Gb321 (talk) 04:31, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 26

    [edit]

    Alberto Jarrín

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 54 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 09:21, 1 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Calle José Ortega y Gasset

    (
    )
    The street nowadays.
    The street nowadays.
    • ... that Calle de Lista was renamed due to the death of a philosopher?
    • Source: [39] Madrid es Noticia 4 July 2019
    • Reviewed:
    Created by Earth605 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    Earth605 (talk) 05:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Palaeocarpinus

    (
    )
    A Palaeocarpinus fruit
    A Palaeocarpinus fruit
    • ... that Palaeocarpinus fruit fossils (pictured) have been recovered from Cold Ash and Hells Half Acre?
    • Source: Crane 1981 Type locality the Cold Ash Quarry in Reading, England.
    Correa-Narvaez & Manchester 2021 distributions in tble 2 Fossils from the Cold Ash Quarry and new fossils from the Hells Half Acre site in Wyoming
    Moved to mainspace by Kevmin (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 372 past nominations.

    Kevmin § 02:30, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    KAAB (Hot Springs, Arkansas)

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Sammi Brie (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 780 past nominations.

    Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 01:17, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • Hi Sammi Brie, review follows: article has been more than 5x expanded since 26 June; article is well written and reliable sources have been cited, the 250 watts power is mentioned only in the infobox and not cited (I see it is in the headlines of one of the articles so should be easy to remedy); hook fact is interesting enough for me, mentioned in the article and checks out to source cited; a QPQ has been carried out. The AFD will need to conclude before I can approve this, but looks to be heading towards keep - Dumelow (talk) 08:33, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Episode 6994

    (
    )
    Improved to Good Article status by DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 15 past nominations.

    DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 00:56, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    References

    1. ^ Tyler, Laura-Jayne (19–25 October 2024). "Hits & Misses!". Inside Soap. No. 42. p. 98.

    Marcel Schwerzmann

    (
    )
    • Reviewed: [[]]
    Moved to mainspace by 1AmNobody24 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    Nobody (talk) 16:01, 26 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Low Kway Song

    (
    )
    • Source: Teo, Han Wue (2019). "The Story of Art in Singapore". In Bak, Lim Kua; Chong, Guan Kwa (eds.). A General History Of The Chinese In Singapore. World Scientific Publishing Company. p. 552.
    Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 185 past nominations.

    KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 15:05, 26 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Probably not? Seems unorthodox to pipe more than one thing in a single place name. KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 02:33, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


    Articles created/expanded on June 27

    [edit]

    Sentient (intelligence analysis system)

    (
    )
    • Reviewed:
    • Comment: Apologies if not done correctly, I've never tried this before. This is my first GA.
    Improved to Good Article status by Very Polite Person (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    -- Very Polite Person (talk) 15:38, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • Just a suggestion, not a review. Maybe it would be more "hooky" to have:
    ALT1:
    --Tryptofish (talk) 22:01, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    ALT2:
    -- Very Polite Person (talk) 00:04, 1 July 2025 (UTC) Is this better? -- Very Polite Person (talk) 00:04, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Christina Næss

    (
    )
    • ... that Christina Næss is the only Paralympic gold medalist for the Faroe Islands?
    5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 52 past nominations.

    Arconning (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Lord Fitzhenry

    (
    )
    Created by LEvalyn (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 15 past nominations.

    ~ L 🌸 (talk) 20:31, 28 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • It's a pleasure to review another gem from LEvalyn. It's a new and comprehensive article. The sourcing is excellent; I especially like the citations to the 18th-century reviews because sources that old are commonly derided as outdated, yet make perfect sense in this context. I see no close paraphrasing problems. I think it would be splendid if the article about Gunning were expanded and nominated within this hook. It has currently got only 460 characters of prose. While I think that a double hook featuring a woman and her work would do very well, this is by no means required for the hook to pass as is. Surtsicna (talk) 08:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Eschiva of Bures

    (
    )
    • Source: "... a messenger , sent from Tiberias by Princess Eschiva , arrived on horseback in Saforie, where the Latin Kingdom's army was preparing to encounter the invading forces of Saladin ... The king decided, against the better advice of Raymond of Tripoli, to leave Saforie early in the morning and try to relieve beleaguered Tiberias, a decision which led to the disastrous defeat at Haṭṭin two days later." (Braun & Razi 2016, p. 216)
    • ALT1: ... that Princess Eschiva's husband was condemned as an unchivalrous coward for counselling against helping his besieged wife–but when the royal army went to save her, they were destroyed? Source:
      "Gerard of Ridefort and Raynald of Châtillon condemned Raymond’s caution as cowardly and unchivalrous, as it left the count’s wife Eschiva and her attendant ladies at the mercy of Saladin’s army." (Lewis 2017, p. 268)
    • ALT2: ... that Princess Eschiva was instructed by her husband to escape into the sea if she could not defend her castle, but surrendered it when she thought that he and her sons had been killed in battle? Source:
      "Raymond III told his wife Eschiva and her bailifs to take to their boats and find refuge in the sea, should they not be able to defend the town against Saladin , and wait there till he came to save them." (Braun & Razi 2016, p. 217.) "Eschiva, under the assumption that her husband Raymond III of Tripoli and her children had been killed in the Battle of Hattin, agreed to surrender Tiberias’s citadel to Saladin." (Reynolds 2019, pp. 12–13)
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Apolonia Dorregaray Veli
    • Comment: Please consider which hook is most interesting. All opinions are welcome.
    5x expanded by Surtsicna (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 227 past nominations.

    Surtsicna (talk) 19:37, 28 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Julia Santos

    (
    )
    Improved to Good Article status by DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 16 past nominations.

    DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 19:54, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Sonic the Hedgehog 3 (film)

    (
    )
    Improved to Good Article status by BarntToust (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    BarntToust 15:40, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    @BarntToust: I've taken the liberty of moving the hooks on that page to this one. For what it's worth, I read the article after seeing it at WP:GARC and the bit about the gold script stuck out; I therefore propose ALT7: ... that a cast member's script for Sonic the Hedgehog 3 cost $100,000 to print?--Launchballer 21:49, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    User:Launchballer I prefer main. Provocative beats impressive in my mind. BarntToust 22:14, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    And mainly because of the fact there's one opportunity to give the idea of Latinas being Shadow's thing a chance to show up on the main page. I could see Jeff Fowler going to GA rather easily and getting a dyk with the concept of him giving the script, and if Jim Carrey were to get to GA, a DYK could be produced of him receiving the script. No other relevant, notable articles for Latina—Shadow business to be included in. BarntToust 22:20, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I think that the idea of Latinas in the DYK is best because of its genuine uniqueness to this article. Jim Carrey's costly script, I can think of two other places where that would work.

    ...that a script for a Jim Carrey movie cost $100k to print?

    that... it cost Jeff Fowler $100k to print a script for Jim Carrey?

    On that note, it is impossible to include anything, period, on Shadow the Hedgehog's DYK because it's already a good article. Only other place where anything about Latinas could be written. That's my standpoint, considering the opportunity and uniqueness of Shadow liking Latinas. BarntToust 22:30, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Remezcla

    Above is a more concise submission that I'd like to put as final for my viewpoint. BarntToust 22:37, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • The way this is framed now feels like it'd fall afoul of WP:DYKFICTION. I think that the other issue with this hook, both the original and revised versions, is that it doesn't meet WP:DYKINT- someone with no special knowledge of the Sonic the Hedgehog franchise won't necessarily know who Shadow the Hedgehog is, or why it would be interesting or unusual if he loved Latinas. The idea of Jim Carrey getting a gold script to reprise his role, though, is more likely to be perceived as generally unusual and novel even if someone has never heard of Sonic before. silviaASH (inquire within) 23:00, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    ... that Sonic the Hedgehog 3 makes its character Shadow love Latinas because the film's director wanted an homage to Sonic fandom shitposting?
    There we go, this one technically works within DYKFICTION. But I see where the 100k gold script part falls much more securely within the lines. I'd be chill with either one, be it this one or ALT 7 though given this explanation. BarntToust 23:05, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Xeokit

    (
    )
    xeokit BIM Viewer
    xeokit BIM Viewer
    • ... that xeokit SDK can visualize 3D BIM models directly in your browser without needing any proprietary software?
    • Source: xeokit SDK enables the visualization of 3D BIM models in standard web browsers without requiring proprietary software, facilitating vendor-neutral workflows helping avoid vendor lock-in.
    • Reviewed:
    Created by Drashevski (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    Drashevski (talk) 12:40, 27 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Well first off the hood needs a link to the actual article! Looking it over, and some of the external pages, I think this is reasonable article. My only concern is the cites - there's plenty of them but most of them point back to GitHub or similar. There are some reasonable mentions in 3rd party papers (basically the second half of the cite list) but there's also a fair number of passing mentions. As always I err on the side of inclusion, so if anyone agrees this passes, the issue is the hook. This seems reasonably hooky: Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    ALT1: ... that the Xeokit software development kit is used to build browser-based programs that can view detailed 3D architectural models (pictured) on the web?
    That still seems a bit too technical or at least specialist. Is there a way to make it more layperson or non-techy friendly? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:04, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 28

    [edit]

    Samuel S. Mayerberg

    (
    )
    Created by Guerreroast (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

    Roast (talk) 05:49, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • Article is new enough and long enough. One image (File:Samuel Spier Mayerberg 1960 alt.jpg): the source website says this is PD, but I'm not sure how that's possible given that they also say the author is unknown and that it was created in 1960 -- unless there's some special consideration in play, like the author being an employee of the US Government, a work from that date must still be in copyright. No other concerns regarding copyvio, BLP, plagiarism or similar. I'm not convinced about some of the sourcing: this website, for instance, seems to be used to support a date -- what makes it a reliable source? Similarly, one much-used source is local news, which is dicey per WP:RS. More subjectively, I'd like to see a couple of spit-and-polish tweaks before it hits the main page -- for example, is it normal to refer to a Jewish religious group as a "church"? UndercoverClassicist T·C 18:45, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      • @UndercoverClassicist: Removed this source; it was a local source from University Academy public school, but I couldn't find any further backing of its reliability. Fixed "church" issue, changed for congregation. Picture is from Harry S. Truman Library, which is federally-ran, so a government employee is extremely likely to have taken the picture.
        • Hm -- I'm not convinced here. A library is a collection of records and documents; it's very unusual for a library not to include materials relevant to its subject made by people to whom it has no relation. Likewise, it's very common for online repositories of this sort to mark media as "public domain" to indicate that they don't know of any copyright, which isn't good enough for us -- we need to be positively sure that no copyright exists. I agree that it's reasonably likely that a government employee took it, but if the source isn't even willing to say that (never mind give a name), I don't think we can use such an assumption as the basis of a PD claim. However, the image would certainly be amenable to an FUR. UndercoverClassicist T·C 20:55, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Local source is from the Kansas City Public Library, which itself cites other newspapers and books, and such should be given the same verdict as the Dictionary of Missouri Biography source—both of which have a citation im common. Roast (talk) 19:33, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    1979 New York prison guards' strike

    (
    )
    Moved to mainspace by Apocheir (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

    Apocheir (talk) 23:00, 29 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Gaetano di Mauro

    (
    )
    5x expanded by Mitchea99 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    Mitchea99 (talk) 03:36, 29 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Volcano Pizzeria

    (
    )
    • ... that according to the family of one of its founders, Volcano Pizzeria was originally a diner selling Italian food before it became the "granddaddy" of Windsor-style pizza?
    • Source: Italian diner: CBC "According to the family, the restaurant didn't start out selling pizza — it was more of a diner that served Italian food."
    • "granddaddy": [1]
    • Source: CBC "They told me Volcano was named after Mount Vesuvius, which is close to Naples, one of the great pizza cities of Italy."
    Moved to mainspace by Username6892 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

    ~UN6892 tc 16:05, 28 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    References

    1. ^ Doelen, Chris Vander (April 6, 1985). "Pizza". The Saturday Windsor Star. p. E4 – via ProQuest.

    Articles created/expanded on June 29

    [edit]

    5 Calls

    (
    )
    • Reviewed:
    Moved to mainspace by Opm581 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    Opm581 (talk | he/him) 22:20, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Hugh II of Jaffa

    (
    )
    Stabbing of Count Hugh
    Stabbing of Count Hugh
    • Source: Mayer 1972, p. 110.
    • ALT1: ... that Count Hugh II of Jaffa was accused of high treason in open court by his own stepson, leading to a bitter dispute that culminated in an attempted assassination (pictured)? Source: Mayer 1972, p. 102
    • ALT2: ... that Count Hugh II of Jaffa was stabbed (pictured) while playing dice in the street in an attack widely seen as having been ordered by the king? Source: Mayer 1972, p. 102.
    • ALT3: ... that her husband's treatment of her cousin and alleged lover Count Hugh II of Jaffa (attack pictured) infuriated Queen Melisende so much that her husband feared for his life? Source: Hamilton 1978, p. 150; Mayer 1972, p. 106.
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Lord Fitzhenry
    • Comment: Which hook do you like best?
    Improved to Good Article status by Surtsicna (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 228 past nominations.

    Surtsicna (talk) 09:27, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

    Hook eligibility:

    • Cited: Yes
    • Interesting: Yes
    • Other problems: No - ?
    Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Article is promoted to GA, new enough and long enough. It is well sourced and plagiarism free as per Earwig (to be picky I'd welcome alteration to "a slight on her honour" as that feels a bit too close and specific to Hamilton (1978)'s wording). Hooks are cited and interesting, although I am AGF for ALTs 0-2 as I can't access the source. For ALT0 I'm not sure what vanquished means in this context - ?killed/?exiled - clarity would be useful I think. For ALT3, I really like the hook, but wonder if it could be pithier? I had to read it a few times to work out what it meant. Picture is free and clear. It might be nice to have the source in the caption? QPQ is done. I put a ? just while wording for 0 and 3 is clarified, but overall it's very interesting. Thanks Lajmmoore (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    1953–1954 royal tour of New Zealand

    (
    )
    Elizabeth II on tour on 25 December 1953
    Elizabeth II on tour on 25 December 1953
    Moved to mainspace by Panamitsu (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 80 past nominations.

    ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:45, 29 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    • Comment I think the stamp would work well as the image for a hook Lajmmoore (talk) 14:13, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • The article is new, technically long enough and well-sourced. I see no copyright issues. What concerns me, Lajmmoore, is that the article looks very much like an engagement diary. They did this and that on this day, then this and that on that day, and so on. While I do not doubt the notability of the topic, I feel that the article fails to present it. Are there no contemporary commentaries on the significance of the visit? Later discussions of long-term significance? Surtsicna (talk) 18:56, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Whistle (Kylie Minogue and múm song)

    (
    )
    • ... that "Whistle" was digitally released nearly a year after the premiere of Jack & Diane, the film it was specifically created for?
    5x expanded by Damian Vo (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.

    Damian Vo (talk) 13:39, 29 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    @Gatoclass: Would you mind sharing how you calculated that? This should be a 5x increase, as it has grown from 5,032 bytes on June 27th to 30k bytes now. Damian Vo (talk) 11:38, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    According to DYKcheck, it's gone from an original 1858 chars to 7282 now. You appear to be counting the number of bytes in the article size, for DYK purposes, it's the readable prose size only that is counted. 7282/1858 = 3.9 expansion. Gatoclass (talk) 12:41, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Gatoclass: Can't believe I'm just learning this now. I've expanded the article quite a bit, it's now over 5x the original size. Could you give it a look? Damian Vo (talk) 08:06, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on June 30

    [edit]

    Suicide by electrocution

    (
    )
    Electric fence at Auschwitz, 2009
    Electric fence at Auschwitz, 2009
    Moved to mainspace by Daniel Case (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 282 past nominations.

    Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 1 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Ray Prohaska

    (
    )
    • ... that although Ray Prohaska's father beat him to dissuade him from becoming an artist, he had a lengthy, successful career as an illustrator?
    Created by Kimikel (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 39 past nominations.

    Kimikel (talk) 02:36, 1 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Stephen of La Ferté

    (
    )
    • ... that when the allegedly poisoned Patriarch Stephen was visited by the king and asked how he was, the dying prelate replied, “Sire, I am faring as you desire”?
    • Source: "When the King came to visit the dying Patriarch, to ask how he was, the latter bitterly remarked: ‘Sire, I am faring as you desire.’" (Runciman 1952, p. 177.)
    • ALT1: ... that Stephen of La Ferté was implored by Saint Bernard not to go on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem, but went anyway and became patriarch? Source: "Bernard's reprimand fell on deaf ears. Stephen not only made his pilgrimage but was elected patriarch of Jerusalem in 1128 and never returned to Europe." (Jotischky 2010, p. 6)
    • ALT2: ... that Stephen of La Ferté was waiting for a ship to take him back to Europe from a pilgrimage to Jerusalem when the patriarch of Jerusalem died, and was subsequently elected to succeed him? Source: "He was waiting for a ship home when the patriarch of Jerusalem died. He was promptly elevated to the patriarchate..." (Riley-Smith 1997, p. 184)
    • ALT3: ... that Stephen of La Ferté was appointed patriarch of Jerusalem because he was the king's cousin, but this backfired when Stephen demanded the king's submission? Source: "If Baldwin had hoped that the ties of cousinhood would make for cordial co-operation, he was soon disillusioned." (Runciman 1952, p. 176)
    • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/1953–1954 royal tour of New Zealand
    5x expanded by Surtsicna (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 229 past nominations.

    Surtsicna (talk) 19:37, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Funeral Oration (Lysias)

    (
    )
    • ... that the ancient Greek orator Lysias wrote a "Funeral Oration", but may have been forbidden from delivering it?
    Improved to Good Article status by UndercoverClassicist (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 37 past nominations.

    UndercoverClassicist T·C 18:46, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Bolton Percy hoard

    (
    )
    Bolton Percy hoard
    Bolton Percy hoard
    Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 147 past nominations.

    Lajmmoore (talk) 17:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Kingdom of Mori

    (
    )
    Created by Juxlos (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 270 past nominations.

    Juxlos (talk) 16:42, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Follow Me (lyme & cybelle song)

    (
    )
    Warren Zevon
    Warren Zevon
    Whitburn, Joel (2001). Top Pop Singles 1955-1999 (9th ed.). US: Record Research Inc. ISBN 0-89820-139-X. Retrieved June 30, 2025, pages 392 & 721
      • Reviewed:
    Improved to Good Article status by VirreFriberg (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

    VirreFriberg (talk) 11:53, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Saskatchewan Marshals Service

    (
    )

    Also, there's no free images of the SMS in Commons.

    5x expanded by Ominae (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 20 past nominations.

    Ominae (talk) 10:14, 30 June 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Articles created/expanded on July 1

    [edit]

    Gusnar Ismail

    (
    )

    [48]: running mate being wife of Rusli Habibie

    Created by Juxlos (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 271 past nominations.

    Juxlos (talk) 11:33, 1 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]

    Zhou Bingde

    (
    )
    Zhou Bingde with Zhou Enlai
    Zhou Bingde with Zhou Enlai
    Created by Toadboy123 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 58 past nominations.

    Toadboy123 (talk) 05:30, 1 July 2025 (UTC).[reply]


    Special occasion holding area

    [edit]
    See also: WP:SOHA

    The holding area is near the top of the Approved page. Please only place approved templates there; do not place them below.

    Do not nominate articles in this section—nominate all articles in the nominations section above, under the date on which the article was created or moved to mainspace, or the expansion began; indicate in the nomination any request for a specially timed appearance on the main page.
    Note: Articles intended to be held for special occasion dates should be nominated within seven days of creations from the start of expansion, or promotion to Good Article status. The nomination should be made at least one week prior to the occasion date, to allow time for reviews and promotions through the prep and queue sets, but not more than six weeks in advance. The proposed occasion must be deemed sufficiently special by reviewers. The timeline limitations, including the six week maximum, may be waived by consensus, if a request is made at WT:DYK, but requests are not always successful. Discussion clarifying the hold criteria can be found here: Hold criteria; discussion setting the six week limit can be found here: Six week limit.
    April Fools' Day hooks are exempted from the timeline limit; see Wikipedia:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Did_you_know&oldid=1298257608#Instructions_for_nominators"